Category: Blog

Your blog category

  • 15 Things From Old TV Shows That Would Be Completely Unthinkable Today

    15 Things From Old TV Shows That Would Be Completely Unthinkable Today

    Old television shows can be fascinating time capsules, especially when they casually treat something as normal that would make audiences stop and stare today. Some of these things involve technology, workplace behavior, advertising, family life, or the way characters interacted with each other, while others reveal just how different television itself used to be. What feels particularly strange is how rarely these moments were presented as unusual at the time. They were simply part of the world the characters inhabited. Looking back now, these fifteen details can make even familiar shows feel like they came from a completely different television culture, and some are genuinely hard to imagine making it onto a screen today.

    The post 15 Things From Old TV Shows That Would Be Completely Unthinkable Today appeared first on Den of Geek.

    Sometimes the best way to sell a movie is apparently to lie about it a little. Trailers have hidden main characters, made comedies look like horror movies, convinced audiences an actor would survive much longer than they did, and occasionally avoided showing what the movie was actually about. Usually, finding out you’ve been misled would be annoying. With movies, it can make the first viewing even better. The audience walks in expecting one thing, the lights go down, and suddenly the story heads somewhere the posters and trailers carefully avoided mentioning. Looking back, some of these campaigns were almost as clever as the movies themselves.

    Here are 15 times Hollywood tricked audiences before they even bought a ticket.

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    ©IMDb

    Psycho (1960)

    Janet Leigh was the biggest star in the cast and featured prominently in the movie’s promotion, encouraging audiences to assume Marion Crane was the protagonist. Then Alfred Hitchcock did the unthinkable and killed her before the movie was even halfway over.

    ©IMDb

    Scream (1996)

    Drew Barrymore was all over the marketing for Scream, making it easy to assume the biggest name in the cast would have a major role. Instead, Casey Becker became the victim of the now-famous opening sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Godzilla (2014)

    Bryan Cranston appeared heavily in the trailers just as Breaking Bad had made him one of television’s biggest stars. Anyone expecting him to lead the monster movie discovered fairly quickly that his role was much smaller than the marketing suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Bridge to Terabithia (2007)

    The trailers leaned heavily into the fantasy world of Terabithia, making the movie look like a kid-friendly adventure in the vein of The Chronicles of Narnia. Anyone who saw it knows that’s not the emotional experience audiences actually got.

    ©IMDb

    Kangaroo Jack (2003)

    The trailers made a talking, rapping kangaroo look like the star of the entire movie. In reality, the kangaroo only talks during a dream sequence, while the actual story is a crime comedy about two friends trying to recover money.

    ©IMDb

    Snow Dogs (2002)

    Another early-2000s offender. The marketing featured talking dogs prominently enough to suggest audiences were getting a movie about wisecracking animals. The dogs only speak during a dream sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Inglourious Basterds (2009)

    The trailers understandably sold Brad Pitt and his group of Nazi-hunting Basterds as the center of the story. They’re important, but the finished movie spends much more time with characters like Shosanna and Hans Landa than the marketing might have suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Crimson Peak (2015)

    Trailers pushed Guillermo del Toro’s movie as a traditional haunted-house horror story. Del Toro himself described it differently: a gothic romance with ghosts in it. Viewers expecting nonstop scares got something much moodier and more romantic.

    ©IMDb

    The Village (2004)

    Coming from M. Night Shyamalan, the campaign emphasized the creatures lurking beyond the village and sold the movie heavily on fear. The actual story is much more interested in isolation, grief, love, and the secret behind the community itself.

    ©IMDb

    It Comes at Night (2017)

    The title, poster, and ominous trailers suggested that some terrifying creature might literally arrive after dark. The movie turned out to be a slow psychological horror story about paranoia and mistrust, leaving some audiences wondering when “it” was going to show up.

    ©IMDb

    The Grey (2011)

    Marketing famously emphasized Liam Neeson preparing to battle wolves, including imagery from a confrontation that comes at the very end. The actual movie is a bleak survival drama concerned much more with mortality and grief than wolf fighting.

    ©IMDb

    Catfish (2010)

    The trailer deliberately presented the documentary almost like a suspense movie, refusing to reveal what Nev Schulman would discover about the woman he’d met online. What followed wasn’t the thriller audiences might have expected, but it did give the internet a whole new word.

    ©IMDb

    Mother! (2017)

    Posters and trailers positioned Darren Aronofsky’s film as a mysterious home-invasion-style psychological horror movie. That description barely prepares anyone for the increasingly surreal biblical allegory the film eventually becomes.

    ©IMDb

    Magic Mike (2012)

    The posters certainly weren’t shy about selling Channing Tatum and male strippers, and audiences understandably expected a light comedy. Steven Soderbergh’s actual movie spends a surprising amount of time on money, ambition, work, and the less glamorous side of the lifestyle.

    The post 14 Movies That Tricked Us All With Their Marketing appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • 15 HR Managers Share Their Wildest Ever Employee Firing

    15 HR Managers Share Their Wildest Ever Employee Firing

    Getting fired is usually pretty straightforward. Maybe someone keeps showing up late, misses too many deadlines, or simply isn’t a good fit for the job. Then there are the employees who make HR departments earn every penny of their salaries. In a recent AskReddit thread, managers and workers shared some of the strangest firings they had ever witnessed, and several sound more like sitcom plots than workplace incidents. We’re talking about a salesperson throwing a customer’s keys onto a roof, an employee getting caught by his own mouse jiggler, and someone losing a job over three pieces of chocolate. Others prove that getting caught is sometimes less embarrassing than the explanation that follows. Here are 15 of the wildest employee firing stories Reddit had to offer.

    The post 15 HR Managers Share Their Wildest Ever Employee Firing appeared first on Den of Geek.

    Sometimes the best way to sell a movie is apparently to lie about it a little. Trailers have hidden main characters, made comedies look like horror movies, convinced audiences an actor would survive much longer than they did, and occasionally avoided showing what the movie was actually about. Usually, finding out you’ve been misled would be annoying. With movies, it can make the first viewing even better. The audience walks in expecting one thing, the lights go down, and suddenly the story heads somewhere the posters and trailers carefully avoided mentioning. Looking back, some of these campaigns were almost as clever as the movies themselves.

    Here are 15 times Hollywood tricked audiences before they even bought a ticket.

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    ©IMDb

    Psycho (1960)

    Janet Leigh was the biggest star in the cast and featured prominently in the movie’s promotion, encouraging audiences to assume Marion Crane was the protagonist. Then Alfred Hitchcock did the unthinkable and killed her before the movie was even halfway over.

    ©IMDb

    Scream (1996)

    Drew Barrymore was all over the marketing for Scream, making it easy to assume the biggest name in the cast would have a major role. Instead, Casey Becker became the victim of the now-famous opening sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Godzilla (2014)

    Bryan Cranston appeared heavily in the trailers just as Breaking Bad had made him one of television’s biggest stars. Anyone expecting him to lead the monster movie discovered fairly quickly that his role was much smaller than the marketing suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Bridge to Terabithia (2007)

    The trailers leaned heavily into the fantasy world of Terabithia, making the movie look like a kid-friendly adventure in the vein of The Chronicles of Narnia. Anyone who saw it knows that’s not the emotional experience audiences actually got.

    ©IMDb

    Kangaroo Jack (2003)

    The trailers made a talking, rapping kangaroo look like the star of the entire movie. In reality, the kangaroo only talks during a dream sequence, while the actual story is a crime comedy about two friends trying to recover money.

    ©IMDb

    Snow Dogs (2002)

    Another early-2000s offender. The marketing featured talking dogs prominently enough to suggest audiences were getting a movie about wisecracking animals. The dogs only speak during a dream sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Inglourious Basterds (2009)

    The trailers understandably sold Brad Pitt and his group of Nazi-hunting Basterds as the center of the story. They’re important, but the finished movie spends much more time with characters like Shosanna and Hans Landa than the marketing might have suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Crimson Peak (2015)

    Trailers pushed Guillermo del Toro’s movie as a traditional haunted-house horror story. Del Toro himself described it differently: a gothic romance with ghosts in it. Viewers expecting nonstop scares got something much moodier and more romantic.

    ©IMDb

    The Village (2004)

    Coming from M. Night Shyamalan, the campaign emphasized the creatures lurking beyond the village and sold the movie heavily on fear. The actual story is much more interested in isolation, grief, love, and the secret behind the community itself.

    ©IMDb

    It Comes at Night (2017)

    The title, poster, and ominous trailers suggested that some terrifying creature might literally arrive after dark. The movie turned out to be a slow psychological horror story about paranoia and mistrust, leaving some audiences wondering when “it” was going to show up.

    ©IMDb

    The Grey (2011)

    Marketing famously emphasized Liam Neeson preparing to battle wolves, including imagery from a confrontation that comes at the very end. The actual movie is a bleak survival drama concerned much more with mortality and grief than wolf fighting.

    ©IMDb

    Catfish (2010)

    The trailer deliberately presented the documentary almost like a suspense movie, refusing to reveal what Nev Schulman would discover about the woman he’d met online. What followed wasn’t the thriller audiences might have expected, but it did give the internet a whole new word.

    ©IMDb

    Mother! (2017)

    Posters and trailers positioned Darren Aronofsky’s film as a mysterious home-invasion-style psychological horror movie. That description barely prepares anyone for the increasingly surreal biblical allegory the film eventually becomes.

    ©IMDb

    Magic Mike (2012)

    The posters certainly weren’t shy about selling Channing Tatum and male strippers, and audiences understandably expected a light comedy. Steven Soderbergh’s actual movie spends a surprising amount of time on money, ambition, work, and the less glamorous side of the lifestyle.

    The post 14 Movies That Tricked Us All With Their Marketing appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • The Biggest ’90s Celeb Scandals We Still Remember Today

    The Biggest ’90s Celeb Scandals We Still Remember Today

    The 1990s produced plenty of unforgettable celebrities, but it also produced a remarkable number of headlines we still remember about them today. Before social media could turn every rumor into a worldwide conversation within minutes, celebrity scandals spread through tabloids, television interviews, entertainment shows, and front pages at an astonishing speed. Some involved relationships, some ended careers, and others became cultural moments that people still bring up decades later. The decade had no shortage of famous faces finding themselves at the center of controversy, often with cameras following every development. These fifteen scandals became part of ’90s pop culture and remain surprisingly familiar even today.

    The post The Biggest ’90s Celeb Scandals We Still Remember Today appeared first on Den of Geek.

    Sometimes the best way to sell a movie is apparently to lie about it a little. Trailers have hidden main characters, made comedies look like horror movies, convinced audiences an actor would survive much longer than they did, and occasionally avoided showing what the movie was actually about. Usually, finding out you’ve been misled would be annoying. With movies, it can make the first viewing even better. The audience walks in expecting one thing, the lights go down, and suddenly the story heads somewhere the posters and trailers carefully avoided mentioning. Looking back, some of these campaigns were almost as clever as the movies themselves.

    Here are 15 times Hollywood tricked audiences before they even bought a ticket.

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    ©IMDb

    Psycho (1960)

    Janet Leigh was the biggest star in the cast and featured prominently in the movie’s promotion, encouraging audiences to assume Marion Crane was the protagonist. Then Alfred Hitchcock did the unthinkable and killed her before the movie was even halfway over.

    ©IMDb

    Scream (1996)

    Drew Barrymore was all over the marketing for Scream, making it easy to assume the biggest name in the cast would have a major role. Instead, Casey Becker became the victim of the now-famous opening sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Godzilla (2014)

    Bryan Cranston appeared heavily in the trailers just as Breaking Bad had made him one of television’s biggest stars. Anyone expecting him to lead the monster movie discovered fairly quickly that his role was much smaller than the marketing suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Bridge to Terabithia (2007)

    The trailers leaned heavily into the fantasy world of Terabithia, making the movie look like a kid-friendly adventure in the vein of The Chronicles of Narnia. Anyone who saw it knows that’s not the emotional experience audiences actually got.

    ©IMDb

    Kangaroo Jack (2003)

    The trailers made a talking, rapping kangaroo look like the star of the entire movie. In reality, the kangaroo only talks during a dream sequence, while the actual story is a crime comedy about two friends trying to recover money.

    ©IMDb

    Snow Dogs (2002)

    Another early-2000s offender. The marketing featured talking dogs prominently enough to suggest audiences were getting a movie about wisecracking animals. The dogs only speak during a dream sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Inglourious Basterds (2009)

    The trailers understandably sold Brad Pitt and his group of Nazi-hunting Basterds as the center of the story. They’re important, but the finished movie spends much more time with characters like Shosanna and Hans Landa than the marketing might have suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Crimson Peak (2015)

    Trailers pushed Guillermo del Toro’s movie as a traditional haunted-house horror story. Del Toro himself described it differently: a gothic romance with ghosts in it. Viewers expecting nonstop scares got something much moodier and more romantic.

    ©IMDb

    The Village (2004)

    Coming from M. Night Shyamalan, the campaign emphasized the creatures lurking beyond the village and sold the movie heavily on fear. The actual story is much more interested in isolation, grief, love, and the secret behind the community itself.

    ©IMDb

    It Comes at Night (2017)

    The title, poster, and ominous trailers suggested that some terrifying creature might literally arrive after dark. The movie turned out to be a slow psychological horror story about paranoia and mistrust, leaving some audiences wondering when “it” was going to show up.

    ©IMDb

    The Grey (2011)

    Marketing famously emphasized Liam Neeson preparing to battle wolves, including imagery from a confrontation that comes at the very end. The actual movie is a bleak survival drama concerned much more with mortality and grief than wolf fighting.

    ©IMDb

    Catfish (2010)

    The trailer deliberately presented the documentary almost like a suspense movie, refusing to reveal what Nev Schulman would discover about the woman he’d met online. What followed wasn’t the thriller audiences might have expected, but it did give the internet a whole new word.

    ©IMDb

    Mother! (2017)

    Posters and trailers positioned Darren Aronofsky’s film as a mysterious home-invasion-style psychological horror movie. That description barely prepares anyone for the increasingly surreal biblical allegory the film eventually becomes.

    ©IMDb

    Magic Mike (2012)

    The posters certainly weren’t shy about selling Channing Tatum and male strippers, and audiences understandably expected a light comedy. Steven Soderbergh’s actual movie spends a surprising amount of time on money, ambition, work, and the less glamorous side of the lifestyle.

    The post 14 Movies That Tricked Us All With Their Marketing appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • 15 Incredible Photos from History You May Not Have Seen

    15 Incredible Photos from History You May Not Have Seen

    History is full of photographs that never made it into textbooks, documentaries, or the collections of famous images we see again and again. Some capture ordinary people caught in an extraordinary moment, while others show familiar places before anyone could imagine what they would eventually become. There are strange details, forgotten faces, everyday scenes, and glimpses of life that feel remarkably close despite being decades or even centuries removed. A great historical photograph does more than show you what something looked like. It gives you a tiny window into a moment that was real, lived, and completely unaware that someone would still be looking at it years later.

    The post 15 Incredible Photos from History You May Not Have Seen appeared first on Den of Geek.

    Sometimes the best way to sell a movie is apparently to lie about it a little. Trailers have hidden main characters, made comedies look like horror movies, convinced audiences an actor would survive much longer than they did, and occasionally avoided showing what the movie was actually about. Usually, finding out you’ve been misled would be annoying. With movies, it can make the first viewing even better. The audience walks in expecting one thing, the lights go down, and suddenly the story heads somewhere the posters and trailers carefully avoided mentioning. Looking back, some of these campaigns were almost as clever as the movies themselves.

    Here are 15 times Hollywood tricked audiences before they even bought a ticket.

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    ©IMDb

    Psycho (1960)

    Janet Leigh was the biggest star in the cast and featured prominently in the movie’s promotion, encouraging audiences to assume Marion Crane was the protagonist. Then Alfred Hitchcock did the unthinkable and killed her before the movie was even halfway over.

    ©IMDb

    Scream (1996)

    Drew Barrymore was all over the marketing for Scream, making it easy to assume the biggest name in the cast would have a major role. Instead, Casey Becker became the victim of the now-famous opening sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Godzilla (2014)

    Bryan Cranston appeared heavily in the trailers just as Breaking Bad had made him one of television’s biggest stars. Anyone expecting him to lead the monster movie discovered fairly quickly that his role was much smaller than the marketing suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Bridge to Terabithia (2007)

    The trailers leaned heavily into the fantasy world of Terabithia, making the movie look like a kid-friendly adventure in the vein of The Chronicles of Narnia. Anyone who saw it knows that’s not the emotional experience audiences actually got.

    ©IMDb

    Kangaroo Jack (2003)

    The trailers made a talking, rapping kangaroo look like the star of the entire movie. In reality, the kangaroo only talks during a dream sequence, while the actual story is a crime comedy about two friends trying to recover money.

    ©IMDb

    Snow Dogs (2002)

    Another early-2000s offender. The marketing featured talking dogs prominently enough to suggest audiences were getting a movie about wisecracking animals. The dogs only speak during a dream sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Inglourious Basterds (2009)

    The trailers understandably sold Brad Pitt and his group of Nazi-hunting Basterds as the center of the story. They’re important, but the finished movie spends much more time with characters like Shosanna and Hans Landa than the marketing might have suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Crimson Peak (2015)

    Trailers pushed Guillermo del Toro’s movie as a traditional haunted-house horror story. Del Toro himself described it differently: a gothic romance with ghosts in it. Viewers expecting nonstop scares got something much moodier and more romantic.

    ©IMDb

    The Village (2004)

    Coming from M. Night Shyamalan, the campaign emphasized the creatures lurking beyond the village and sold the movie heavily on fear. The actual story is much more interested in isolation, grief, love, and the secret behind the community itself.

    ©IMDb

    It Comes at Night (2017)

    The title, poster, and ominous trailers suggested that some terrifying creature might literally arrive after dark. The movie turned out to be a slow psychological horror story about paranoia and mistrust, leaving some audiences wondering when “it” was going to show up.

    ©IMDb

    The Grey (2011)

    Marketing famously emphasized Liam Neeson preparing to battle wolves, including imagery from a confrontation that comes at the very end. The actual movie is a bleak survival drama concerned much more with mortality and grief than wolf fighting.

    ©IMDb

    Catfish (2010)

    The trailer deliberately presented the documentary almost like a suspense movie, refusing to reveal what Nev Schulman would discover about the woman he’d met online. What followed wasn’t the thriller audiences might have expected, but it did give the internet a whole new word.

    ©IMDb

    Mother! (2017)

    Posters and trailers positioned Darren Aronofsky’s film as a mysterious home-invasion-style psychological horror movie. That description barely prepares anyone for the increasingly surreal biblical allegory the film eventually becomes.

    ©IMDb

    Magic Mike (2012)

    The posters certainly weren’t shy about selling Channing Tatum and male strippers, and audiences understandably expected a light comedy. Steven Soderbergh’s actual movie spends a surprising amount of time on money, ambition, work, and the less glamorous side of the lifestyle.

    The post 14 Movies That Tricked Us All With Their Marketing appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • 14 Movies That Tricked Us All With Their Marketing

    14 Movies That Tricked Us All With Their Marketing

    Sometimes the best way to sell a movie is apparently to lie about it a little. Trailers have hidden main characters, made comedies look like horror movies, convinced audiences an actor would survive much longer than they did, and occasionally avoided showing what the movie was actually about. Usually, finding out you’ve been misled would be annoying. With movies, it can make the first viewing even better. The audience walks in expecting one thing, the lights go down, and suddenly the story heads somewhere the posters and trailers carefully avoided mentioning. Looking back, some of these campaigns were almost as clever as the movies themselves.

    Here are 15 times Hollywood tricked audiences before they even bought a ticket.

    The post 14 Movies That Tricked Us All With Their Marketing appeared first on Den of Geek.

    Sometimes the best way to sell a movie is apparently to lie about it a little. Trailers have hidden main characters, made comedies look like horror movies, convinced audiences an actor would survive much longer than they did, and occasionally avoided showing what the movie was actually about. Usually, finding out you’ve been misled would be annoying. With movies, it can make the first viewing even better. The audience walks in expecting one thing, the lights go down, and suddenly the story heads somewhere the posters and trailers carefully avoided mentioning. Looking back, some of these campaigns were almost as clever as the movies themselves.

    Here are 15 times Hollywood tricked audiences before they even bought a ticket.

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    ©IMDb

    Psycho (1960)

    Janet Leigh was the biggest star in the cast and featured prominently in the movie’s promotion, encouraging audiences to assume Marion Crane was the protagonist. Then Alfred Hitchcock did the unthinkable and killed her before the movie was even halfway over.

    ©IMDb

    Scream (1996)

    Drew Barrymore was all over the marketing for Scream, making it easy to assume the biggest name in the cast would have a major role. Instead, Casey Becker became the victim of the now-famous opening sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Godzilla (2014)

    Bryan Cranston appeared heavily in the trailers just as Breaking Bad had made him one of television’s biggest stars. Anyone expecting him to lead the monster movie discovered fairly quickly that his role was much smaller than the marketing suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Bridge to Terabithia (2007)

    The trailers leaned heavily into the fantasy world of Terabithia, making the movie look like a kid-friendly adventure in the vein of The Chronicles of Narnia. Anyone who saw it knows that’s not the emotional experience audiences actually got.

    ©IMDb

    Kangaroo Jack (2003)

    The trailers made a talking, rapping kangaroo look like the star of the entire movie. In reality, the kangaroo only talks during a dream sequence, while the actual story is a crime comedy about two friends trying to recover money.

    ©IMDb

    Snow Dogs (2002)

    Another early-2000s offender. The marketing featured talking dogs prominently enough to suggest audiences were getting a movie about wisecracking animals. The dogs only speak during a dream sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Inglourious Basterds (2009)

    The trailers understandably sold Brad Pitt and his group of Nazi-hunting Basterds as the center of the story. They’re important, but the finished movie spends much more time with characters like Shosanna and Hans Landa than the marketing might have suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Crimson Peak (2015)

    Trailers pushed Guillermo del Toro’s movie as a traditional haunted-house horror story. Del Toro himself described it differently: a gothic romance with ghosts in it. Viewers expecting nonstop scares got something much moodier and more romantic.

    ©IMDb

    The Village (2004)

    Coming from M. Night Shyamalan, the campaign emphasized the creatures lurking beyond the village and sold the movie heavily on fear. The actual story is much more interested in isolation, grief, love, and the secret behind the community itself.

    ©IMDb

    It Comes at Night (2017)

    The title, poster, and ominous trailers suggested that some terrifying creature might literally arrive after dark. The movie turned out to be a slow psychological horror story about paranoia and mistrust, leaving some audiences wondering when “it” was going to show up.

    ©IMDb

    The Grey (2011)

    Marketing famously emphasized Liam Neeson preparing to battle wolves, including imagery from a confrontation that comes at the very end. The actual movie is a bleak survival drama concerned much more with mortality and grief than wolf fighting.

    ©IMDb

    Catfish (2010)

    The trailer deliberately presented the documentary almost like a suspense movie, refusing to reveal what Nev Schulman would discover about the woman he’d met online. What followed wasn’t the thriller audiences might have expected, but it did give the internet a whole new word.

    ©IMDb

    Mother! (2017)

    Posters and trailers positioned Darren Aronofsky’s film as a mysterious home-invasion-style psychological horror movie. That description barely prepares anyone for the increasingly surreal biblical allegory the film eventually becomes.

    ©IMDb

    Magic Mike (2012)

    The posters certainly weren’t shy about selling Channing Tatum and male strippers, and audiences understandably expected a light comedy. Steven Soderbergh’s actual movie spends a surprising amount of time on money, ambition, work, and the less glamorous side of the lifestyle.

    The post 14 Movies That Tricked Us All With Their Marketing appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • 15 Movie Secrets Hidden in Plain Sight

    15 Movie Secrets Hidden in Plain Sight

    Many movie viewers consider themselves experts in catching hidden details, scouring films even on a first time watch to see everything the filmmaker is trying to convey. And yet, even they miss hidden clues and details made by creators that, in retrospect, can only be catched on a second viewing.

    The best examples are especially satisfying because they’re technically visible the first time around, while at the same time being almost impossible to appreciate without knowing what to look for. These are the kinds of movie secrets that make a revisit feel like watching an entirely different film, because suddenly, all those tiny details start looking suspiciously important.

    The post 15 Movie Secrets Hidden in Plain Sight appeared first on Den of Geek.

    Sometimes the best way to sell a movie is apparently to lie about it a little. Trailers have hidden main characters, made comedies look like horror movies, convinced audiences an actor would survive much longer than they did, and occasionally avoided showing what the movie was actually about. Usually, finding out you’ve been misled would be annoying. With movies, it can make the first viewing even better. The audience walks in expecting one thing, the lights go down, and suddenly the story heads somewhere the posters and trailers carefully avoided mentioning. Looking back, some of these campaigns were almost as clever as the movies themselves.

    Here are 15 times Hollywood tricked audiences before they even bought a ticket.

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    ©IMDb

    Psycho (1960)

    Janet Leigh was the biggest star in the cast and featured prominently in the movie’s promotion, encouraging audiences to assume Marion Crane was the protagonist. Then Alfred Hitchcock did the unthinkable and killed her before the movie was even halfway over.

    ©IMDb

    Scream (1996)

    Drew Barrymore was all over the marketing for Scream, making it easy to assume the biggest name in the cast would have a major role. Instead, Casey Becker became the victim of the now-famous opening sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Godzilla (2014)

    Bryan Cranston appeared heavily in the trailers just as Breaking Bad had made him one of television’s biggest stars. Anyone expecting him to lead the monster movie discovered fairly quickly that his role was much smaller than the marketing suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Bridge to Terabithia (2007)

    The trailers leaned heavily into the fantasy world of Terabithia, making the movie look like a kid-friendly adventure in the vein of The Chronicles of Narnia. Anyone who saw it knows that’s not the emotional experience audiences actually got.

    ©IMDb

    Kangaroo Jack (2003)

    The trailers made a talking, rapping kangaroo look like the star of the entire movie. In reality, the kangaroo only talks during a dream sequence, while the actual story is a crime comedy about two friends trying to recover money.

    ©IMDb

    Snow Dogs (2002)

    Another early-2000s offender. The marketing featured talking dogs prominently enough to suggest audiences were getting a movie about wisecracking animals. The dogs only speak during a dream sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Inglourious Basterds (2009)

    The trailers understandably sold Brad Pitt and his group of Nazi-hunting Basterds as the center of the story. They’re important, but the finished movie spends much more time with characters like Shosanna and Hans Landa than the marketing might have suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Crimson Peak (2015)

    Trailers pushed Guillermo del Toro’s movie as a traditional haunted-house horror story. Del Toro himself described it differently: a gothic romance with ghosts in it. Viewers expecting nonstop scares got something much moodier and more romantic.

    ©IMDb

    The Village (2004)

    Coming from M. Night Shyamalan, the campaign emphasized the creatures lurking beyond the village and sold the movie heavily on fear. The actual story is much more interested in isolation, grief, love, and the secret behind the community itself.

    ©IMDb

    It Comes at Night (2017)

    The title, poster, and ominous trailers suggested that some terrifying creature might literally arrive after dark. The movie turned out to be a slow psychological horror story about paranoia and mistrust, leaving some audiences wondering when “it” was going to show up.

    ©IMDb

    The Grey (2011)

    Marketing famously emphasized Liam Neeson preparing to battle wolves, including imagery from a confrontation that comes at the very end. The actual movie is a bleak survival drama concerned much more with mortality and grief than wolf fighting.

    ©IMDb

    Catfish (2010)

    The trailer deliberately presented the documentary almost like a suspense movie, refusing to reveal what Nev Schulman would discover about the woman he’d met online. What followed wasn’t the thriller audiences might have expected, but it did give the internet a whole new word.

    ©IMDb

    Mother! (2017)

    Posters and trailers positioned Darren Aronofsky’s film as a mysterious home-invasion-style psychological horror movie. That description barely prepares anyone for the increasingly surreal biblical allegory the film eventually becomes.

    ©IMDb

    Magic Mike (2012)

    The posters certainly weren’t shy about selling Channing Tatum and male strippers, and audiences understandably expected a light comedy. Steven Soderbergh’s actual movie spends a surprising amount of time on money, ambition, work, and the less glamorous side of the lifestyle.

    The post 14 Movies That Tricked Us All With Their Marketing appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • Star Trek: Lower Decks’ Carol Freeman Is the Franchise’s Most Competent Captain

    Star Trek: Lower Decks’ Carol Freeman Is the Franchise’s Most Competent Captain

    When one thinks of the canonical heroes of Star Trek, the names Kirk, Picard, Sisko, and Janeway leap to mind. Each of these captains went on fantastical adventures, inspired the loyalty of their crews, and broke Starfleet protocol more than a few times along the way. Looking at The Original Series, The Next Generation, and […]

    The post Star Trek: Lower Decks’ Carol Freeman Is the Franchise’s Most Competent Captain appeared first on Den of Geek.

    Sometimes the best way to sell a movie is apparently to lie about it a little. Trailers have hidden main characters, made comedies look like horror movies, convinced audiences an actor would survive much longer than they did, and occasionally avoided showing what the movie was actually about. Usually, finding out you’ve been misled would be annoying. With movies, it can make the first viewing even better. The audience walks in expecting one thing, the lights go down, and suddenly the story heads somewhere the posters and trailers carefully avoided mentioning. Looking back, some of these campaigns were almost as clever as the movies themselves.

    Here are 15 times Hollywood tricked audiences before they even bought a ticket.

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    ©IMDb

    Psycho (1960)

    Janet Leigh was the biggest star in the cast and featured prominently in the movie’s promotion, encouraging audiences to assume Marion Crane was the protagonist. Then Alfred Hitchcock did the unthinkable and killed her before the movie was even halfway over.

    ©IMDb

    Scream (1996)

    Drew Barrymore was all over the marketing for Scream, making it easy to assume the biggest name in the cast would have a major role. Instead, Casey Becker became the victim of the now-famous opening sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Godzilla (2014)

    Bryan Cranston appeared heavily in the trailers just as Breaking Bad had made him one of television’s biggest stars. Anyone expecting him to lead the monster movie discovered fairly quickly that his role was much smaller than the marketing suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Bridge to Terabithia (2007)

    The trailers leaned heavily into the fantasy world of Terabithia, making the movie look like a kid-friendly adventure in the vein of The Chronicles of Narnia. Anyone who saw it knows that’s not the emotional experience audiences actually got.

    ©IMDb

    Kangaroo Jack (2003)

    The trailers made a talking, rapping kangaroo look like the star of the entire movie. In reality, the kangaroo only talks during a dream sequence, while the actual story is a crime comedy about two friends trying to recover money.

    ©IMDb

    Snow Dogs (2002)

    Another early-2000s offender. The marketing featured talking dogs prominently enough to suggest audiences were getting a movie about wisecracking animals. The dogs only speak during a dream sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Inglourious Basterds (2009)

    The trailers understandably sold Brad Pitt and his group of Nazi-hunting Basterds as the center of the story. They’re important, but the finished movie spends much more time with characters like Shosanna and Hans Landa than the marketing might have suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Crimson Peak (2015)

    Trailers pushed Guillermo del Toro’s movie as a traditional haunted-house horror story. Del Toro himself described it differently: a gothic romance with ghosts in it. Viewers expecting nonstop scares got something much moodier and more romantic.

    ©IMDb

    The Village (2004)

    Coming from M. Night Shyamalan, the campaign emphasized the creatures lurking beyond the village and sold the movie heavily on fear. The actual story is much more interested in isolation, grief, love, and the secret behind the community itself.

    ©IMDb

    It Comes at Night (2017)

    The title, poster, and ominous trailers suggested that some terrifying creature might literally arrive after dark. The movie turned out to be a slow psychological horror story about paranoia and mistrust, leaving some audiences wondering when “it” was going to show up.

    ©IMDb

    The Grey (2011)

    Marketing famously emphasized Liam Neeson preparing to battle wolves, including imagery from a confrontation that comes at the very end. The actual movie is a bleak survival drama concerned much more with mortality and grief than wolf fighting.

    ©IMDb

    Catfish (2010)

    The trailer deliberately presented the documentary almost like a suspense movie, refusing to reveal what Nev Schulman would discover about the woman he’d met online. What followed wasn’t the thriller audiences might have expected, but it did give the internet a whole new word.

    ©IMDb

    Mother! (2017)

    Posters and trailers positioned Darren Aronofsky’s film as a mysterious home-invasion-style psychological horror movie. That description barely prepares anyone for the increasingly surreal biblical allegory the film eventually becomes.

    ©IMDb

    Magic Mike (2012)

    The posters certainly weren’t shy about selling Channing Tatum and male strippers, and audiences understandably expected a light comedy. Steven Soderbergh’s actual movie spends a surprising amount of time on money, ambition, work, and the less glamorous side of the lifestyle.

    The post 14 Movies That Tricked Us All With Their Marketing appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • Remembering the Failed Green Lantern Movie Starring Jack Black

    Remembering the Failed Green Lantern Movie Starring Jack Black

    Brightest day has finally arrived for Green Lantern fans. Despite all the hand-wringing leading up to its premiere, the HBO series Lanterns is finally here and it’s really good. Just as importantly, it’s really strange, filled with way more DC cosmic lore than the early True Detective-style stills led us to believe. Lanterns is so […]

    The post Remembering the Failed Green Lantern Movie Starring Jack Black appeared first on Den of Geek.

    Sometimes the best way to sell a movie is apparently to lie about it a little. Trailers have hidden main characters, made comedies look like horror movies, convinced audiences an actor would survive much longer than they did, and occasionally avoided showing what the movie was actually about. Usually, finding out you’ve been misled would be annoying. With movies, it can make the first viewing even better. The audience walks in expecting one thing, the lights go down, and suddenly the story heads somewhere the posters and trailers carefully avoided mentioning. Looking back, some of these campaigns were almost as clever as the movies themselves.

    Here are 15 times Hollywood tricked audiences before they even bought a ticket.

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    ©IMDb

    Psycho (1960)

    Janet Leigh was the biggest star in the cast and featured prominently in the movie’s promotion, encouraging audiences to assume Marion Crane was the protagonist. Then Alfred Hitchcock did the unthinkable and killed her before the movie was even halfway over.

    ©IMDb

    Scream (1996)

    Drew Barrymore was all over the marketing for Scream, making it easy to assume the biggest name in the cast would have a major role. Instead, Casey Becker became the victim of the now-famous opening sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Godzilla (2014)

    Bryan Cranston appeared heavily in the trailers just as Breaking Bad had made him one of television’s biggest stars. Anyone expecting him to lead the monster movie discovered fairly quickly that his role was much smaller than the marketing suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Bridge to Terabithia (2007)

    The trailers leaned heavily into the fantasy world of Terabithia, making the movie look like a kid-friendly adventure in the vein of The Chronicles of Narnia. Anyone who saw it knows that’s not the emotional experience audiences actually got.

    ©IMDb

    Kangaroo Jack (2003)

    The trailers made a talking, rapping kangaroo look like the star of the entire movie. In reality, the kangaroo only talks during a dream sequence, while the actual story is a crime comedy about two friends trying to recover money.

    ©IMDb

    Snow Dogs (2002)

    Another early-2000s offender. The marketing featured talking dogs prominently enough to suggest audiences were getting a movie about wisecracking animals. The dogs only speak during a dream sequence.

    ©IMDb

    Inglourious Basterds (2009)

    The trailers understandably sold Brad Pitt and his group of Nazi-hunting Basterds as the center of the story. They’re important, but the finished movie spends much more time with characters like Shosanna and Hans Landa than the marketing might have suggested.

    ©IMDb

    Crimson Peak (2015)

    Trailers pushed Guillermo del Toro’s movie as a traditional haunted-house horror story. Del Toro himself described it differently: a gothic romance with ghosts in it. Viewers expecting nonstop scares got something much moodier and more romantic.

    ©IMDb

    The Village (2004)

    Coming from M. Night Shyamalan, the campaign emphasized the creatures lurking beyond the village and sold the movie heavily on fear. The actual story is much more interested in isolation, grief, love, and the secret behind the community itself.

    ©IMDb

    It Comes at Night (2017)

    The title, poster, and ominous trailers suggested that some terrifying creature might literally arrive after dark. The movie turned out to be a slow psychological horror story about paranoia and mistrust, leaving some audiences wondering when “it” was going to show up.

    ©IMDb

    The Grey (2011)

    Marketing famously emphasized Liam Neeson preparing to battle wolves, including imagery from a confrontation that comes at the very end. The actual movie is a bleak survival drama concerned much more with mortality and grief than wolf fighting.

    ©IMDb

    Catfish (2010)

    The trailer deliberately presented the documentary almost like a suspense movie, refusing to reveal what Nev Schulman would discover about the woman he’d met online. What followed wasn’t the thriller audiences might have expected, but it did give the internet a whole new word.

    ©IMDb

    Mother! (2017)

    Posters and trailers positioned Darren Aronofsky’s film as a mysterious home-invasion-style psychological horror movie. That description barely prepares anyone for the increasingly surreal biblical allegory the film eventually becomes.

    ©IMDb

    Magic Mike (2012)

    The posters certainly weren’t shy about selling Channing Tatum and male strippers, and audiences understandably expected a light comedy. Steven Soderbergh’s actual movie spends a surprising amount of time on money, ambition, work, and the less glamorous side of the lifestyle.

    The post 14 Movies That Tricked Us All With Their Marketing appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • How AI Is Changing Online Courses, Coaching, and Client Results

    How AI Is Changing Online Courses, Coaching, and Client Results

    How AI Is Changing Online Courses, Coaching, and Client Results written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

    Catch the Full Episode: Overview When live events went virtual almost overnight, everyone had a hard deadline forcing the change. John Jantsch sits down with Blue Melnick, co-founder of Sage Event Management, to talk about a shift he thinks is bigger and quieter: AI moving into the coaching, consulting, and course world. Melnick’s take: the […]

    How AI Is Changing Online Courses, Coaching, and Client Results written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

    Catch the Full Episode:

    Overview

    John Jantsch and Blue Melnick on the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, episode "How AI Is Changing Online Courses, Coaching, and Client Results"

    When live events went virtual almost overnight, everyone had a hard deadline forcing the change. John Jantsch sits down with Blue Melnick, co-founder of Sage Event Management, to talk about a shift he thinks is bigger and quieter: AI moving into the coaching, consulting, and course world. Melnick’s take: the opportunity is using AI to get your clients better results, faster, versus just getting more done yourself.

    The conversation digs into what Melnick calls the “moment of need.” That’s the 2 a.m. moment when a client’s brain is racing and the only person available is ChatGPT or Claude, not their coach. Melnick and John talk through why specialized knowledge still beats general AI. They dig into why the gap between teaching something and a client applying it is where most coaching programs lose people. They also talk about why courses built the old way (record a video, hope someone finishes it) are giving way to something better.

    This one’s for coaches, consultants, agency owners, and course creators ready to put AI to work for their clients and open up a strong opportunity for their business.

    Guest Bio

    Blue Melnick runs Sage Event Management with his wife and business partner, Barry Baumgartner. Together they’ve produced live events for clients including Tony Robbins and ClickFunnels. Melnick and Baumgartner also run a coaching program built around launching high-ticket offers through virtual live events, and they’ve spent the past 2 years building Obi, an AI co-producer designed to guide clients through implementation instead of leaving them to figure it out on their own. Obi is set to launch publicly in September 2026.

    Key Takeaways

    • AI’s shift for coaches and consultants isn’t a temporary disruption like the pandemic’s push to virtual events. AI isn’t going away, so plan for it as permanent.
    • The real leverage isn’t personal productivity: Most people ask what AI can do for them, the bigger opportunity is asking what you can do with AI for your clients.
    • People pay for specialized knowledge, not general information. AI chatbots offer general intelligence, but your years of specific expertise are still what clients are buying.
    • The gap between teaching a client something and that client implementing it is where most coaching programs and courses lose people. Use AI to walk clients across that gap instead of handing them information and hoping.
    • Build programs around the outcome, not around content volume.

    Great Moments

      • [02:09] – Melnick traces the AI shift back to ChatGPT 3.5 and the early hype around “prompt cookbooks,” before people realized AI slop was a real problem.
      • [05:23] – Melnick tells the story of a former client bragging about vibe-coding a replacement for their CRM, and why he wants nothing to do with running that infrastructure himself.
      • [09:18] – Melnick riffs on AGI and the “Skynet” fear everyone jokes about, then points to the real opportunity: pairing specialized knowledge with AI.
      • [21:59] – Melnick shares research showing spending on education, free information online, and device access have all climbed together over the past 30 years.
      • [23:30] – Melnick announces Obi’s September 2026 launch and points listeners to changecourse.ai for Barry Baumgartner’s free training.

    Memorable Quotes

    • “Just because you have a genius in your pocket doesn’t mean you know what to ask it.” —Blue Melnick
    • “The key to AI making a huge difference is seeing what I can do with AI for my clients, not what AI can do for me.” —Blue Melnick
    • “The desire for knowledge, the desire for people to take you through a specific journey never changes. What changes is the delivery mechanism.” —Blue Melnick
    • “When people get a result, they don’t ask for a refund.” —Blue Melnick

    Resources

    John Jantsch (00:00.984)

    So, what if the next big shift in events has nothing to do with virtual versus in-person and maybe everything to do with who or what is actually running the room when it’s live? Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jantsch. My guest today is Blue Melnick. He runs Sage Event Management with his wife and business partner Barry Baumgartner. They produce live events for the likes of Tony Robbins and ClickFunnels. And these days, Blue’s focused on what’s next.

    an AI co producer called Obi that runs inside a live event built to help small businesses run bigger launches with less overhead. So Blue, welcome to the show.

    Blue Melnick (00:41.195)

    Thanks, John. I’m really, really excited to be here and talk a little bit about AI, a little bit about events if it makes sense. And yeah, just a a a fun conversation.

    John Jantsch (00:47.406)

    You bet.

    So we all lived, well, if you were around four or five years ago, we all lived through kind of a a giant shift in how events work. a lot of people really were already doing it. A lot of people had to figure it out. what’s telling you that AI is is is actually maybe even a bigger shift and not just another way that we can be more efficient?

    Blue Melnick (01:17.397)

    Yeah, you know, it’s interesting you you mentioned COVID essentially and and the shift we all had to make from in person events to virtual events. And some of us had to make that shift really, really, really quickly. I think the biggest difference between what happened then and what’s happening with AI is nobody told us at that point that the shift was coming.

    John Jantsch (01:30.456)

    Right.

    Blue Melnick (01:41.877)

    Right. Nobody was like, hey, in six months, you’re not going to be able to do in person events anymore. So start preparing. and exactly, exactly. I think, and I think, you know, that’s the good news. because this this shift with AI, I I I mean, I started hearing about this inside of masterminds that we’re a part of inside of conversations with our clients a couple of years ago. Right. it almost was like it was with the advent of essentially,

    John Jantsch (01:44.75)

    Right.

    Yeah. Yeah. Get a Zoom account right now.

    John Jantsch (02:05.174)

    Mm-hmm.

    Blue Melnick (02:09.46)

    Chat GPT 3.5 was really where things started to get interesting and people started to notice, coaches started to notice, and you know, people started to talk about prompt cookbooks and how you could generate a year’s worth of content in 17 seconds and things like that. People soon realized that AI slop is a little bit too much of a real thing. But over the course of the last couple of years, it’s gotten progressively better.

    And I think for those of us who are running coaching programs, who are running live events, who are helping people with the information that we have in our heads, right? The knowledge that we have so that they, our clients, can take that knowledge and implement it in their business. AI is becoming a real tool that we can use to help get our clients.

    Faster results more effectively. Yeah. Most most people talk about when they talk about AI still today, you hear most people talk about how I can be more productive as a result of AI, right? I can get more done. I can do this with it. I can do this. I can do that. I, I, I, I, I. And I really think, funny enough, I really think that the key to AI making a huge difference for a lot of people is.

    John Jantsch (03:19.918)

    Yeah.

    Blue Melnick (03:36.852)

    Is turning that and not seeing what AI can do for me, but seeing what I can do with AI for my clients. and that that’s where we’re seeing a huge shift. And the cool thing is, like, you know, like you, the the original question, which was how is this one different and possibly bigger? COVID went away, right? Virtual events are still a thing, but you can also now go back and do in-person events if you want.

    I think AI, with AI, the genie’s out of the bottle. You know, like that’s that’s sticking around. It’s not like in a couple of years we’re not gonna have AI with us anymore. I think that is just gonna become more and more and more prevalent. And I mean, not to be not to be a doomsday person, but I think clients and coaches and consultants who don’t start to integrate tools that help their clients get results faster with AI.

    Are going to start to see a decline in business. And it’s going to be slow and gradual. For some, it may be like paper cuts, but for some, it may be much bigger than that.

    John Jantsch (04:38.956)

    Yeah. Yeah.

    Well, and I think what’s what’s gonna happen, what we’re telling people and coaching people on is that you know, clients are starting to figure out businesses. We work primarily small, mid-sized businesses, starting to figure out they can use some of these tools and they are sort of haphazardly using some of these tools. But I think the real winner in the coaching consulting space is gonna be the people that show them how to do it right, how to how to actually, you know, put leadership first instead of the technology first.

    and that’s really I think a great I think that’s one of the greatest opp I’ve been doing this thirty years. I think it’s one of the greatest opportunities for consulting. that that that’s you know, that’s come come before me at least.

    Blue Melnick (05:23.287)

    Totally. And you know, I think I I saw something interesting on on Instagram or I don’t remember if it was Instagram or Facebook recently, but an old client of ours posted something online and and they were like, This is so amazing. I just vibe coded a whole new CRM and I got rid of my platform that I was spending hundreds of dollars a month on. It wasn’t a big number, right? It was like

    John Jantsch (05:43.054)

    Right.

    Blue Melnick (05:50.552)

    Two, 300 bucks a month on whatever they were using. And I have to tell you, I thought to myself in that moment, I’m a bit of a nerd, I’m a bit of a nerd. I love technology. I, I mean, I’m I’ve been vibe coding new tools like crazy. But when I saw that, I thought to myself, that’s insane. That is the one, there are a lot of things that I want nothing to do with having to manage the infrastructure of. And one of them is the backbone of my business, which is our CRM, right? Like

    John Jantsch (06:19.725)

    Mm-hmm.

    Blue Melnick (06:20.757)

    I don’t want to deal with the, I mean, I know what I would have to deal with. I don’t want to have to deal with the C the SMTP servers and the the all of the stuff behind the scenes. And sure you can do it, but as a you know, as a small business owner, isn’t our time better spent on better things, like getting more results for our clients? Come on.

    John Jantsch (06:27.789)

    Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

    John Jantsch (06:39.96)

    Yes.

    John Jantsch (06:45.135)

    Yeah, and I I think one of the things that people are missing that, you know, there there was this time when, like, QuickBooks is going away, Salesforce is going away, all these things are going away. I think they’re only going to get stronger because we’re going to get more dependent because they’re building all the AI into it natively. And so all of a sudden it’s like, why would you build any in fact, not only why would you, but I can’t ever leave. You know, because my entire business now, you know, depends on this this tool. So I think some of the bigger SAS files.

    forms are actually going to win.

    Blue Melnick (07:16.699)

    I I agree with you. And I also think that there’s an opportunity for those of us in the coaching and consulting space to create you know, to to leverage AI and help our help our clients get the results that we provide, right? The the knowledge that we have much, much faster. my my wife calls it the moment of need.

    John Jantsch (07:36.055)

    It’s just

    Yeah.

    Blue Melnick (07:43.381)

    Right. When a a small business owner, an entrepreneur wakes up at two o’clock in the morning and they can’t get back to sleep and their brain starts racing. I’m sure this has never happened to you.

    John Jantsch (07:49.198)

    Yeah. I I I had one of those last week, two thirty in the morning, yes. I I just got up, I was like, why fight it?

    Blue Melnick (07:54.36)

    Right. Exactly. Right. So but you’re your so your brain starts racing, and who’s the last person that you can call at that moment? it’s our coach, right? You know, I’m not getting on the phone with my coach at that time of the day. so instead you log into chat or you log into Claude. And I think that that’s an opportunity that should be taken advantage of by those of us in the coaching and consulting space. Because

    John Jantsch (08:05.167)

    Yeah, yeah, yeah.

    You’re right.

    Blue Melnick (08:24.939)

    Claude and Claude and Chat and you know, Grok and Gemini, all of them, they’re fantastic and they’re great tools. But they really don’t have the experience, the expertise that that you have, John, that I have, that your listeners have, right? All of us as individuals, we’ve got this incredible expertise that is very specific. a long time ago, I’m sure you’ve read it.

    John Jantsch (08:37.942)

    Mm-hmm. Right.

    Blue Melnick (08:51.515)

    Some of us have read it a thousand times, but think of Think and Grow Rich came out, right? And there’s the the segment inside that chap inside that book on specialized knowledge versus generalized knowledge. And specialized knowledge is what everybody tends to pay money for, right? That’s that’s why they come to us and hire us for whatever it is that you or your audience charges. It’s specialized knowledge, not general knowledge. And I think it’s

    John Jantsch (08:55.183)

    Sure, sure, sure.

    John Jantsch (09:12.44)

    Mm-hmm.

    Blue Melnick (09:18.825)

    Interesting that the big thing that AI companies are aiming towards, right? The big ones, the Frontier Labs, as you will as they call themselves, they’re aiming for this thing called AGI. Right? Have you have you heard the the right? So AGI is are is it artificial? But the thing that’s important is the GI, general intelligence.

    John Jantsch (09:33.175)

    Mm-hmm. Sure, of course, of course, yes.

    Blue Melnick (09:46.068)

    So everybody’s like, this is gonna be amazing. We’ll have this, you know, AGI. It’s gonna be a moment, it’s like the, you know, the moment when Skynet opens up and takes over the world. I’m like, or maybe there’s an opportunity for us to use AI with our specialized knowledge and grow our business and help our clients get results. And I think that’s really where where we’re headed, you know? And I agree with you, it’s a huge opportunity.

    John Jantsch (10:08.815)

    So so Yeah. So so let’s talk a little bit about OB. first off, I mentioned it in the intro. what the heck is it?

    Blue Melnick (10:13.408)

    Mm-hmm.

    Blue Melnick (10:18.231)

    So a couple of years ago, Barry and I, we have a coaching program where of course we help people help people launch a high-ticket offer through the power of a virtual live event. And we we’ve been doing what coaches in group programs do forever, which is we take our knowledge, we teach you, and then you have to take that information, translate it to your own business, and then apply it.

    John Jantsch (10:31.535)

    Mm-hmm.

    Blue Melnick (10:45.135)

    And you know, as a coach, as a consultant, I’ve I’ve said the same thing most coaches and consultants have said for, you know, years, which is I’m responsible for my part, which is I’m gonna deliver all of the information to you. You’re responsible for your part, which is the implementation. But the problem is that gap between knowledge and implementation, we think of as something that’s like, it’s just like like just this this far apart, right? It’s so close. But for our clients, it’s

    It’s like the Grand Canyon. It is a massive, massive, massive gap that is where people fall down. It’s why, you know, courses, generally speaking, have like a sub 20% completion rate. And in our inside, we were seeing a lot of the same things inside of our coaching program. And we were like, okay, well, what if we were to use AI not to create an open ended, like custom GPT?

    Right. Like this, you know, just open chat thing, but rather a way to use AI and our knowledge to guide our clients through a specific process or what we call a journey and ask them questions so that we have the context that is most important, like, hey, John, who do you serve? How do you help them? you know.

    John Jantsch (11:58.095)

    Mm-hmm.

    Blue Melnick (12:08.075)

    Where do they live in the world? What are they trying to accomplish? How are they better after they’ve worked with you than they were before? Things like this. And then use that context to continue to grow and build on itself with the specific thing that I want you to do next in order to get the outcome that I’ve promised if you work with me. So inside of our coaching program, we started to implement these AI steps.

    That we’re like, okay, first you’re gonna teach we’re gonna teach you how to determine who your right fit client is, create a profile for them, figure out what it is that they’re struggling with at two o’clock in the morning, and figure out what it is that they’re trying to achieve. And all using a combination of AI with our know-how, right? 20 years of having done this. Then we’re gonna go from that to, okay, how is it? What’s the framework that you have? What processes do you have to help your clients achieve the result?

    John Jantsch (12:52.138)

    Mm-hmm.

    Blue Melnick (13:04.575)

    Then we’re going to go from that to now, how do we package your offer? Right. And all of this goes in order. And as we go from one thing to the other, we taught people how to do this previously over the course of like a six-month period. Now, what we do is we guide them through this process where they’re answering a series of questions, and rather than having to apply it to figure out what their process is or

    John Jantsch (13:18.22)

    Right.

    Blue Melnick (13:30.698)

    apply it to figure out what their coaching program or their offer or their high-ticket offer is, we just provide it to them. So we teach them the know-how so they understand how to do it. But then we rather than them have to translate, rather than them having to, you know, cross that gap, that chasm that is the Grand Canyon, we literally just grab them and drag them across. Right. Maybe we zip, maybe I should I should use the analogy of a zip line. But that’s what OB is. So we’re using AI.

    To ask our clients specific questions to help them get the result that they came to us to get in the first place. And to get that result faster, quicker, and easier. So that in a one-year coaching program, in our case, your coaching program doesn’t have to be a year, your program doesn’t have to be a year, but whatever it is that you’re doing with them, you’re able to do it faster and more effectively so that they get the outcome. Because here’s the thing.

    John Jantsch (14:18.509)

    Mm-hmm.

    Blue Melnick (14:28.363)

    You know, we’ve all gotten refund requests from maybe a course. Like if you sell a digital course, you’ve you’re you’re used to refund requests. When people get a result, they don’t ask for a refund.

    John Jantsch (14:33.27)

    Great.

    John Jantsch (14:38.966)

    Right. Right. You know, and even as somebody who has sold courses for twenty five years, you know, nothing frustrated me more than the fact that that I know that only a percentage of people were doing anything with it, whether they asked for a refund or not, you know, they they, you know, in some cases they just felt guilty. You know, it’s like, it’s my my decision to buy it. I just didn’t use it. I mean, we’ve all we’ve all probably done that ourselves. talk talk to me a little bit about the state of the

    the course and the coaching industry in general. I know that’s a that’s a a big topic to to to open up, but you know, one thing that of course people make lots of proclamations, but one thing people say with AI is like, well, nobody’s gonna do a course now because nobody wants to watch a 40 minute video. They’ll just tell AI to tell it what’s in the 40 minute video. it tell me well, just from your opinion, where that’s wrong, where that’s right, what that means.

    Blue Melnick (15:34.796)

    Yeah. Well, I think there’s a few things. first off, I think courses as they used to exist, let’s just say yesterday, I I do think are gonna die a slow death over the course of the coming years. And for some people, they’ve died a really, really quick death because people just stopped buying. I think there’s a number of reasons for that. one of the reasons is for those of us who have recorded courses in the past, you know, it’s it’s kind of like birthing a book.

    John Jantsch (15:43.629)

    Yeah.

    John Jantsch (15:50.957)

    Mm-hmm.

    Blue Melnick (16:03.285)

    Right. It’s it’s a slow process. It takes time. And once you’ve recorded it, you’re like, I never want to do that again. Like we, I I mean, I don’t ever want to stand in front of a camera with no audience and record my content again. So that’s one problem. And the the flip side to that is people don’t, to your point, don’t want to sit through a 40-minute long video and then have to translate. So I think courses as they existed yesterday are gone. But here’s the thing.

    John Jantsch (16:03.733)

    Mm-hmm.

    Right.

    Right.

    John Jantsch (16:24.212)

    Mm-hmm.

    Blue Melnick (16:32.083)

    Over the course of the last, let’s say 120 years or so, and I know that’s a big number for some of us, but over the course of the last 120 years in the education space, we’ve seen monumental changes, right? television, radio, books on tape, VHS, CD-ROMs, not in this order, obviously, the internet.

    do you I don’t know if you remember when Stanford released their entire course curriculum in 2012 on the internet for free. Everybody was like, my God, courses are dead. Stanford’s not even charging for their stuff. Right? So this has happened over time multiple times. The the prediction of our knowledge being necessary, it’s the end of that. And every single time, what happens when you go back and look at history is

    John Jantsch (17:08.044)

    Right.

    Blue Melnick (17:25.269)

    The desire for knowledge, the desire for people to take you through a specific journey never changes. What changes is the delivery mechanism. So how our clients get information or desire information or transformation is changing, right? TikTok is a part of that, you know, or Instagram reels or Facebook reels, the shorts are a part of that. AI is a part of that. They want the information and the transformation faster. So

    In order to keep up, in order to keep moving forward, we as course creators have to deliver that information in a bespoke way, right? So how do you deliver customized knowledge to let’s say you sell your course to a hundred people? You don’t want to sit down with a hundred people and do this one to one. This is why we sell courses, right? But how do you take that information, provide them bite-sized chunks, the equivalent of an Instagram reel? So they feel as though,

    That’s interesting. And now they answer a few questions and they get an output that is customized to them based on what they just learned. That’s a different way of learning, which is where the where your audience is right now. They’re looking for that dopamine hit. They’re looking for that instant gratification that, you know, scrolling, doing this with our phone provides, but they’re looking for it from you because they still need it.

    John Jantsch (18:31.404)

    Right.

    John Jantsch (18:45.524)

    Yeah.

    Blue Melnick (18:51.371)

    Right. It’s not like all of a sudden ChatGPT and Claude have gotten so much better and now everybody’s getting results. That hasn’t happened. Right? Just because you have a genius in your pocket doesn’t mean you know what to ask it. So

    John Jantsch (19:03.318)

    Yeah, yeah, in fact I in fact I think people are working harder and getting less, quite frankly, out of out of that.

    Blue Melnick (19:07.963)

    I yeah, I wouldn’t disagree with you. I saw a study recently, or I read a study yester recently that talked about how companies that have done huge implementations of AI in their business are actually seeing their workforce be less productive than they were before, which is I think surprising to many people.

    John Jantsch (19:28.716)

    Yeah, I think I think the I’ve said all along, you know, everybody talks about, all the changes in marketing and I and the one they they often forget is the fact that what’s changed the most is the way people buy now or get to buy or expect to buy. And I think that what you just pointed to, consumption behavior, you know, of course is is probably what should be driving, you know, how we’re thinking, you know, about them as much as content.

    Blue Melnick (19:54.23)

    Yeah, and you know, I was I was doing some more research. And of course, some of this research is a little self-serving, right? Because I have a solution to what I think is a problem. and I think we’ve found, I mean, this isn’t a whiteboard solution where we’re like, we think this is gonna work like this. I mean, we’ve been using this solution inside of our coaching program for two years. And we’re seeing like massive, massive results. And the thing that I’m that I’m loving about it, truthfully,

    And this is selfish, right? But I inside of our coaching program, we used to year over year, because it’s a group coaching program, there’s like 150 people in the program. We used to see about a 30% renewal year over year. And since we’ve started implementing Obi inside of our coaching program, our coaching program renewals have increased to 45% or more every time we go through a renewal cycle. And we’ve gone, we’ve been through three of them now since we released this platform.

    John Jantsch (20:32.47)

    Mm-hmm.

    John Jantsch (20:53.494)

    Hmm.

    Blue Melnick (20:54.545)

    And it’s the only thing we’re doing different. Like it’s not like all of a sudden it’s not cheaper. We’re not one of those coaching programs where when you join the second year, it’s like 50% off or anything like that. It’s the same price year two as it was year one. with the same promise, incidentally. So you know, I think I think that says obviously says a lot. but yeah, I think consumption is really important. We have to see what it is that our clients

    John Jantsch (20:59.062)

    Yeah.

    Blue Melnick (21:23.625)

    Are wanting, what the audience is is looking for, and shifting to delivering it in that way so that they get the support they need in their moment of need. So this leads to just another thing that I was working on recently, just really, really quickly. I think this is an interesting one. I was looking at the amount of money spent on education, essentially on online education over the course of the last 30 years or so. And

    It does this like that. Like it’s, and it’s just like it’s hockey stick, right? It’s just like keep going. So I overlaid something else over top of that, which was I was like, okay, now let’s compare the amount of information that was accessible on the internet for free at the beginning of that compared to now, right? Where now is let’s just say 100%, and back at the beginning is a percentage of it.

    John Jantsch (21:59.393)

    Mm.

    Blue Melnick (22:22.463)

    And when you overlay the amount of information that was free over top of the amount of information that people are spending on information, they both go hand in hand. Right. And when you overlay that with a third piece of information, which is the amount of folks who have digital devices that can access that information, all three of them go up in the same level, which is counterintuitive because you would think, everything’s free on the internet. Why would they need me?

    John Jantsch (22:32.717)

    Yeah.

    Blue Melnick (22:53.151)

    And actually think the opposite is true, right? Everything’s free on the internet, which is why they need you to provide the specific transformation that they’re wanting rather than this general piece of information that’s out there called Chat GPT or Claude. so yeah, I think that’s where we’re at. That’s you know a little bit of a soapbox, but I’ll I’ll stop.

    John Jantsch (23:02.806)

    Okay.

    John Jantsch (23:09.686)

    Yeah, yeah, yeah.

    John Jantsch (23:16.692)

    No, I’ve I agree with you a hundred percent. I unfortunately we gotta wrap up today. So I know that you are launching a program coming up soon. So you wanna tell us about that, where people can connect with you, find out more about Obi.

    Blue Melnick (23:30.805)

    Yeah, so listen, if you want to learn more about how I think course creators are about to make a comeback, my my lovely wife, Barry Baumgartner, is hosting a free training. you can get access to that at changecourse.ai. if you want to learn more about Obi, Obi is going to be released in some in the month of September. I’m not sure when you’re listening to this, but it’s going to be released in September 2026.

    We’re using it internally. We have about 60 beta testers right now who are using it. And you can find out more by going to obai or sorry, obio, or on Instagram or Facebook at obai. So lots of ways to find out more about us. but we’d love to yeah, answer any questions you have. We’re having some fun over on our Instagram channel recently. Of course.

    John Jantsch (24:15.566)

    Awesome.

    Blue Melnick (24:25.767)

    we’re we’re using AI to produce a lot of the content, but very openly, right? Like we’re not trying to hide it, but we are trying to have a little bit of fun with some of the tools that are available to us as creators these days. So check it out.

    John Jantsch (24:37.634)

    Yeah. That’s awesome. Well, Blue, I appreciate you taking a moment to stop by the Duct Tape Marketing podcast and hopefully we’ll run into you one of these days out there on the road.

    Blue Melnick (24:46.027)

    Thanks for having me.

    powered by

  • 15 of Our Creepiest Mysteries That Remain Unsolved

    15 of Our Creepiest Mysteries That Remain Unsolved

    There are mysteries that seem like they should have an answer by now. A person vanishes after making a phone call. Three women disappear from the same house without taking their belongings. A hijacker jumps out of an airplane with $200,000 and is never definitively seen again. Years turn into decades, searches get bigger, and theories pile up, but the central question stays exactly where it started. Reddit users recently shared the unsolved cases they still can’t get out of their heads, and some are famous while others are surprisingly obscure. From a bizarre television broadcast to a pilot’s final radio transmission, these are the stories that still don’t quite add up.

    The post 15 of Our Creepiest Mysteries That Remain Unsolved appeared first on Den of Geek.

    Ryan Gosling may be just Ken, but for a good chunk of his career, he was known for intense characters, full of broiling interiority. He shed his Mickey Mouse Club image by playing a reckless romantic in The Notebook, a drug-addicted inspirational teacher in Half Nelson, and a silent driver in Drive. But lately, Gosling seems to be taking a turn to the goofy. In addition to his acclaimed role as Ken in Barbie, Gosling played a lovable science teacher sent into space for Project Hail Mary. He’s working with Shawn Levy on both Star Wars: Starfighter and the upcoming MCU Ghost Rider movie.

    But his most interesting new role might be the one he just took on. Deadline has reported that Gosling will play a grown-up version of Bamm-Bamm, the muscular son of Barney and Betty Rubble, in an upcoming Flintstones movie. If Gosling’s going to bring his weirdo sensibilities to the favorite characters of kids in the post-World War II era, why stop at the Flintstones? Here are some other beloved baby boomer figures for Gosling to bring to the screen.

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    Mike Brady

    The Baby Boomers may have become the hippies of the ’60s, but they were born in the wake of World War II and in the shadow of the Eisenhower Administration. So while some embraced the wild free love lifestyle, others would watch rock shows and miniskirts from afar, not ready to leave the safe confines of the suburbs. For those kids, there was The Brady Bunch, a sitcom made all the weirder for how square it actually was. As anyone who has heard the show’s infectious theme song can tell you, The Brady Bunch was about a blended family: Mike Brady and his three sons learning to live with Mike’s new wife Carol and her three daughters, with Alice the maid along for the ride.

    The Brady Bunch has long been the subject of pop culture wonder, most notably the tongue-in-cheek movie from 1995. So if Gosling’s going to come aboard, a new Brady Bunch project has to go where neither show nor movie has gone before: to the early days of Mike Brady. What was he like as a swinging bachelor? What did he do in his first marriage? How did a man as square as the guy we saw in the sitcom raise someone like his oldest son Greg, the original Johnny Bravo himself? At 45, Gosling might be a bit old to play the young Mike, but since when has The Brady Bunch ever cared about realism?

    Davy Crockett

    Gosling may be going for mainstream roles lately, but he still surely loves a challenge. And what better baby boomer icon to challenge than Davy Crockett, the coonskin-wearing frontiersman whose checkered actions were turned into acts of heroism in a series of Disney movies starring Fess Parker? In those family-friendly episodes, Davy Crockett was an able hunter and a kind soul, someone at one with the land. He palled around the countryside with his sidekick George Russell, played by future Beverly Hillbilly Buddy Ebsen.

    Obviously, the real Davy Crockett was far more complicated. True, he opposed Andrew Jackson’s cruel Indian Removal Act, but he also played a key part in the Battle of the Alamo, helping to advance American annexation of Mexico. That mixed legacy would make for a less fun character, but definitely something more interesting. Gosling could play his Davy Crockett not unlike his Ken, a fictional character coming to terms with the difficulties of the real world. It would give him another chance to be fun on screen while still saying something of substance.

    Boo-Boo

    But maybe Gosling doesn’t want to be so heavy. Maybe he just wants to have fun and follow in the footsteps of that noted thespian, Justin Timberlake. If that’s the case, then perhaps Gosling would like to play Boo-Boo, the diminutive ursine sidekick of that notorious picnic basket thief, Yogi the Bear.

    Like most Hanna-Barbera cartoons of the era, the adventures of Yogi and Boo-Boo aren’t exactly ground-breaking. In each episode, Yogi hatches a plan to steal some food from campers at Jellystone Park, and they’re foiled each time by Ranger Smith. But the same charge could be leveled against Nirvanna the Band The Show, which also devoted each episode to plots to play the Rivoli. So if Gosling could get Matt Johnson to write and direct, and perhaps even star as a particularly Canadian-sounding bear, then his sardonic weirdo Boo-Boo could be the stuff of legend.

    The Smothers Brothers

    Ryan Gosling already has a host of memorable characters in his filmography. Yet, as Michael B. Jordan showed us in Sinners, nothing tests an actor’s skill like playing twins. However, Gosling wouldn’t want to just copy what another guy did. He’d want to put his own spin on it, which is why he should play brothers who aren’t identical twins, namely Tommy and Dick Smothers a.k.a. the Smothers Brothers.

    The Smothers Brothers got their start in the folk movement, wearing suits and sweaters while Tommy played guitar and Dick played bass. But their delightful banter on television appearances paved the way for their own variety show, The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour, which ran from 1967 to 1969. Against their wholesome folk roots, the Comedy Hour became a counter-cultural hit, hosting acts like Buffalo Springfield and Jefferson Airplane. The duo’s unlikely political relevance would make for a compelling biopic, giving Gosling a chance to do a one-man two-hander.

    Gomer Pyle

    We know that Gosling will soon become Johnny Blaze, the Ghost Rider. But maybe he could also play Captain Marvel? Or, at least, Captain Marvel’s biggest fan, Gomer Pyle, who would exclaim “Shazam!” whenever something baffled him… and Gomer Pyle was often baffled. Played by Jim Nabors, Gomer Pyle got his start on The Andy Griffith Show, where he worked on cars at Wally’s Service Station. With his memorable catchphrase and distinctive Southern drawl, Gomer soon became a breakout character and got his own show. Gomer Pyle USMC followed the Mayberry native’s adventures in the United States Marines, where he often angered his commanding officer, Sergeant Carter (Frank Sutton).

    We know that Gosling can play affable and clueless, and the time is always right for some shenanigans on military bases. But Nabors was also a gifted singer, so playing Gomer would give Gosling a chance to show off his voice. Could a song about thinking while wearing a bucket be as popular as “I’m Just Ken”? If anyone can do it, it’s Ryan Gosling.

    The post 5 More Baby Boomer Childhood Staples Ryan Gosling Should Play appeared first on Den of Geek.