Category: Blog

Your blog category

  • Turn Client Relationships Into Revenue Growth

    Turn Client Relationships Into Revenue Growth

    Turn Client Relationships Into Revenue Growth written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

    Catch the full episode: Overview In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch sits down with Taylor McMaster, founder of Dot & Company, to unpack a commonly overlooked growth constraint in agencies: client account management. While most agencies obsess over lead generation and fulfillment, Taylor makes the case that long-term growth is […]

    The Role of AI in Modern Copywriting written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

    Catch the Full Episode:

    jon bensonOverview

    In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch sits down with Jon Benson, creator of the Video Sales Letter (VSL) and founder of the AI platform Benson. Jon shares how AI is reshaping the world of copywriting, not by replacing human creativity, but by amplifying it.

    The conversation explores the evolution of VSLs, why they continue to outperform despite industry skepticism, and how AI is changing the way marketers create, test, and optimize content at scale. Jon also dives into the importance of maintaining a human voice, building ethical persuasion frameworks, and avoiding the trap of generic AI-generated content.

    Guest Bio

    Jon Benson is a copywriter, entrepreneur, and AI innovator best known for creating the Video Sales Letter (VSL), a format that revolutionized digital marketing. With a background in persuasion and behavioral psychology, Jon has spent decades refining ethical copywriting techniques. He is the founder of Benson, an AI platform trained on high-converting campaigns designed to help businesses create more effective, human-centered marketing.

    Key Takeaways

    1. AI Should Amplify Creativity, Not Replace It

    The real opportunity with AI is turning marketers into better editors, strategists, and decision-makers, not eliminating the human role.

    2. VSLs Still Work After 20 Years

    Despite claims that they’re outdated, VSLs continue to drive strong results when built on solid messaging and persuasive structure.

    3. Words Matter More Than Format

    Whether it’s video, text, or ads, the effectiveness of marketing still comes down to the quality of the words and messaging.

    4. Most AI Content Fails Due to Lack of Input

    Generic prompts produce generic results. AI needs context, personality, and values to generate effective copy.

    5. Personality and Values Drive Connection

    Great marketing aligns with what customers already believe and value, rather than trying to force persuasion.

    6. AI Enables Massive Scale in Testing

    Top marketers run hundreds of variations simultaneously, something only possible at scale with AI.

    7. Ethical Persuasion Requires Guardrails

    Without clear boundaries, AI can drift into manipulative messaging. Defining what to say and what not to say is critical.

    8. AI Is a Power Tool, Not a Replacement

    Like upgrading from a hammer to a power tool, AI removes manual effort so humans can focus on higher-level creativity.

    9. Training AI Is Essential

    To get quality output, users must teach AI their voice, values, and audience rather than relying on default behavior.

    10. Copywriting Still Requires Strategy

    Even with AI, understanding persuasion fundamentals and customer psychology remains essential.

    Great Moments

    00:01 – AI as a Creative Multiplier
    John introduces the idea that AI enhances, not replaces, human creativity.

    01:16 – The Birth of the VSL
    Jon shares how Video Sales Letters transformed his career and the marketing landscape.

    04:08 – Early Adoption of AI in Copywriting
    Jon explains his long-term vision for AI-powered copy tools.

    06:21 – Are VSLs Overused?
    Why VSLs continue to perform despite years of skepticism.

    08:46 – Why Words Still Win
    The importance of messaging over format in marketing success.

    09:11 – The Problem with Generic AI Content
    Why most AI-generated content feels robotic and ineffective.

    11:40 – The Role of Personality in Copy
    How values and voice shape better marketing outcomes.

    14:26 – AI as a Creative Partner
    Using AI to enhance, not replace, human creativity.

    16:37 – The Power of Testing at Scale
    How AI enables massive experimentation and optimization.

    18:23 – Ethical Guardrails in AI Marketing
    Why defining boundaries is essential for responsible persuasion.

    Memorable Quotes

    “The words are the consistent thing. If the words don’t reflect a human, people sense it immediately.”

    “AI isn’t the answer, it’s a tool. You still need to bring strategy and voice to it.”

    “You’re not trying to convince people, you’re aligning with what they already value.”

    “Think of AI as a power tool, it removes the grunt work so you can focus on creativity.”

    John Jantsch (00:01.651)

    So what if the real opportunity with AI is not replacing human creativity but expanding it by turning entrepreneurs into better editors, directors, and decision makers? Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duck Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jantsch. My guest today is Jon Benson. He’s a copywriter, entrepreneur, and AI pioneer best known for creating the video sales letter, one of those terms that people just use like it’s been around forever.

    A format that shapes modern digital marketing. is long centered on ethical persuasion and authentic connection. And more recently, he developed BNSN, an AI platform trained on high converting campaigns for small businesses. So John, welcome to the show.

    Jon Benson (00:29.9)

    Yeah.

    Jon Benson (00:47.212)

    Hey, John. Thanks for having me.

    John Jantsch (00:49.585)

    So let’s, I assume you have to do this a little bit of your time when you go on shows like this, but the term VSL, you know, is kind of entered the, the marketing vernacular. Talk to me a little bit about, I’ve been doing this for 30 years. That was probably 12, 15 years ago, really, when that kind of burst on the scene as an innovation. You want to talk a little bit about what that’s done to your trajectory, I suppose.

    Jon Benson (00:55.202)

    Mm-hmm. Yeah. yeah.

    Jon Benson (01:02.04)

    Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (01:16.216)

    Yeah, believe it or not, it’s 20 years old this year. So 2006. Yeah. Yeah. Crazy. It’s, mean, it was, it, yeah, everything changed that the, day that happened, the 30 days later, everything changed from my offer that I did it for, you know, we went from like struggling onto my second book that I wrote in, in fitness and then went to a million dollars.

    John Jantsch (01:18.537)

    20 years, okay.

    Jon Benson (01:39.886)

    a week and a month rather in traffic cost, you people buying that kind of money and going up to even higher than that. So it was crazy. And then, and then all of people started calling me and asking me to write VSLs for them. And I’m not, I wasn’t a copywriter. that’s not, never been my claim to fame until after this happened. And then I had to get good at writing copy. So that’s what happened.

    John Jantsch (02:01.939)

    That’s funny. So you said you had written a book about gym ownership? Is that what you said?

    Jon Benson (02:10.663)

    I’ve written six books in fitness, so weight loss, fitness, bodybuilding, yeah, so that whole thing has been a passion.

    John Jantsch (02:12.947)

    Fitness, fitness, okay. Okay, so are you one of those people that that was your passion and you just had to learn how to do marketing? And so this whole idea of studying persuasion and conversion and innovation, is that something that was really just picked up because you’re like, I better get good at that?

    Jon Benson (02:24.748)

    Yeah.

    Jon Benson (02:34.478)

    It was picked up specifically for copywriting, yes, but I studied persuasion in college. Actually, I was studying MLP in college. I was fascinated by how you can basically get people to listen to you and hear what you’re actually trying to communicate and motivate them to make changes based on things that you believe at least are good for them. So you’re not trying to manipulate them. You’re just trying to motivate them. And I was always into like, how can I motivate and connect with people deeper? So I studied the MLP back then, way back then.

    John Jantsch (02:39.731)

    Mm.

    Jon Benson (03:03.22)

    and mail order course from, from Bandler. And that got me into Tony Robbins and that led me into even deeper persuasion issues. And, and just was always really fascinated by it. And that led to me being into the advertising world. And that would, that led eventually to writing a book with it. Yeah. I actually would have the book thing came about because I’d always been passionate about, bodybuilding and fitness and things like that growing up and athlete. I was an athlete most of my life. And then

    ended up sedentary and got ended up obese in my late 20s and early 30s. I had 50 inch waist and had a heart attack at 38. So I was like, it was like a train wreck of health. And that got me back into it. So that’s the Fit Over 40 book was written based on that, on turning that around. And then I interviewed a bunch of other people because I didn’t think I was enough for a book. So I did 52 people that did the same.

    John Jantsch (03:55.283)

    So I’m curious, this is a question, unfortunately, I feel like I’m asking almost every guest these days, but how has AI changed that element of copywriting for good or bad?

    Jon Benson (04:00.942)

    It’s

    Jon Benson (04:08.494)

    So my goal with AI and copywriting, I’ve been doing copywriting software since 2010. So this is going to date me a lot, but in AI, in early nascent AI in 2017 and working with early LLMs in 2019. So very, very, very early into this thing and trying to convince everybody, this was the thing that we wanted to do. And the reason why is because I was, I had these courses that I would teach people how to write VSOs and I knew how hard it was for me to learn all the copywriting in and outs and

    and develop my own style, which I did. And I said, well, what, what if I could have software that would do it for them? And the average business owner doesn’t have time to do that. They just want the copy that converts. So I’ve seen it from 15 years away going, I know this is going to happen eventually. And so we decided that the software is pronounced Benson. That’s not my last name. It’s just my last name without the vowels. And, and yeah, yeah, but it’s, cool that you can spell it out. That’s all right. and so we did Benson originally, it was going to be called,

    John Jantsch (04:56.529)

    okay. Not BNSM like I butchered it, okay?

    Jon Benson (05:06.35)

    It was going to, because it was the first AI to actually write a long form VSL. And I was working with, with Jasper at the time they were called Jarvis, but I was the first guy in the copywriter to train anything on an LLM. And they ended up with a 62nd VSL out of all the training. I think, yeah, I think we can do this in a different way. And we ended up being, you know, having a 7,000 word VSL come out of our AI and it sounded like a real VSL.

    John Jantsch (05:14.729)

    Sure, yeah.

    Jon Benson (05:32.663)

    It didn’t sound like chat, GBT, it didn’t sound like Claude, it sounded like a real VSL. And so that was our claim to fame. And since then we just, of course got, we were very early into the agentic phase. So we’ve just gotten better and better at that. And so my goal was to replace myself. That’s what I wanted to do. I wanted to say, if I can, if I can use this to write a VSL, which I have, sells pages for my own stuff, which I have, then I know that it’s going to be good enough to, for prime time. And that was the, that was the goal to do. yeah.

    John Jantsch (06:02.549)

    So talk to, obviously we’ve got more to explore in AI, but talk to me a little bit about the VSL itself. mean, it has become very mainstream. I mean, you hear people talk about it, whether they know what it is or not. They talk about it as part of their funnel, you know, today. So is it overdone? I mean, is it over?

    Jon Benson (06:06.094)

    Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (06:10.316)

    Mm. Yep.

    yeah.

    Jon Benson (06:21.806)

    Yeah, every year I hear that I’ve heard that for 20 years. So it literally 20 years. So the first year I came out with it and said, Oh, it’s already and then Ryan Dias, who’s a good friend of mine made the mistake of saying when he came out and promoted his own little mini VSO course and he later gave me credit for which was really nice of him and everything. But he said, Oh, sales letters are dead. You’ll never do another sales. And I’m like, dude, I’ve never said that, you know, I think everything works if you let it and VSO is just happened to keep on working and they just ask, ask Agora.

    John Jantsch (06:24.157)

    Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

    Jon Benson (06:51.022)

    They work. I mean, yeah, they work. They work really well and now people are using BSLs in feed So you’ve got the meta ads that are basically short BSLs that use the same psychology Just compressed into five two to five minutes. So we’ve been doing that for 15 years as well So yeah, and then they go to a longer BSL So they they still work just as sales pages work just as webinars can work everything can work It just depends on what you’re wanting to sell and how you’re and how you approach it But the words are the consistent thing

    So if the words aren’t there, if the words don’t reflect an actual human underneath it, people sense it a mile away, which was our goal with Benson was to create humanized AI. How do we do this? How do we create AI that doesn’t sound robotic? It doesn’t sound like, you know, chat GPT writing an email, it’s asking a rhetorical question. And the very first sentence, you know, this kind of really bad AI copy that we see all the time. How do we do this and actually sound like a real A-list copywriter? And that was, that’s been our focus for three and a half years now.

    John Jantsch (07:20.456)

    Yeah.

    John Jantsch (07:48.413)

    You know, initially the large innovation was that it was not a talking head on video. It was the words. Is that a key component of it?

    Jon Benson (07:56.174)

    Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (08:01.113)

    You know, it depends on what you’re trying to sell. We have seen split tests with video beating words only, and we’ve seen words only beat video. It really depends on what it is. And what works today, a year from now, will be something you want to reverse. So for a while there was like my friend Craig who writes for Golden Hippo, and he’s done amazingly well building a billion dollar company from, he’s an amazing writer. But he was one of the first guys working with Gundry to do a lot of video.

    on the front end of a VSL, but talking to him behind the scenes, so to say, we know that it’s still like a Google Doc and the words are everything. So he slaves over the words, man, getting the words just right. So all the video in the world is not gonna save you if your words suck. It just isn’t gonna happen. So the words are still the most important.

    John Jantsch (08:46.077)

    Yeah, yeah, yeah.

    So one of the knocks on AI, of course, is it’s made it very easy for people to create really crappy content. you see it all the time now, right? It’s like volumes of really bad content. So why can’t people create better content? What’s the mistake they’re making? Is it simply just a matter of being lazy?

    Jon Benson (08:54.831)

    Yeah, yeah.

    Yeah.

    Yeah.

    Jon Benson (09:11.983)

    No, it’s the matter of the LLMs or the in our case, it’s the agents not knowing you. And this is where it gets a little bit a little bit hairy for people, because there has to be an element of your personality that’s OK to be known. as the same thing would be true if you went and hired me as a copywriter. Like I would ask you if you had an offer and you wanted to whatever your offer would be. I would start asking you lots of questions that you probably don’t think is related to your offer.

    John Jantsch (09:19.719)

    Yeah, yeah,

    Jon Benson (09:40.336)

    Now I’m not talking about like when asking all these really intensive personal questions, but I want to know what your values are. I want to know where you stand. Who do you want to attract as customers? What are you against? What are you not just what the, what the product does? Cause the product or the offer, whatever it does, I that’s, that’s not that difficult. Um, what’s difficult is to make that story resonate with people that will automatically hear and go, Oh, that sounds like something that I can automatically relate to. And that’s what a really good copy. does. We don’t try to sell people that are

    not interested or just completely need to go from a level one to a level five awareness, that’s really not what we wanna do. We wanna target people that are already there, because you got plenty of people like that, but if you write, if you go into a chat or clod or whatever and you say, write me an email or write me an ad or rep me a VSO, and they don’t know who you are, they don’t have a good feel of your words, feel of your personality, it’s gonna write stuff that’s schlocky, because it’s trained on the internet. So if you just think about this for a moment, and everyone listening to me will get this,

    John Jantsch (10:35.294)

    Yeah, yeah.

    Jon Benson (10:39.043)

    It’s like, can you imagine training anyone to do anything by telling them, go read the internet and get back to me tomorrow? That’s what we’ve done with LLMs, right? It’s like, well, that’s going to give you a lot of knowledge, but most of it sucks. mean, so most of what’s out there in copy is terrible. So it’s learning models have been terrible. So that’s why specialty AI is like ours and in our, in our industry, you have to have it to where the people that know what they’re doing actually trained individual.

    John Jantsch (10:46.665)

    Right.

    Jon Benson (11:06.487)

    in our cases, agents that use not one LLM, but a dozen, you know, can use as many as we need one model rather, but you know, doesn’t whatever models are we know are going to be the best ones for the right tasks. So that takes that. And then what we do is a little different. We ask people to go through an assessment to figure out what are their values? Where do they stand? Who are the people they want to attract? And how do they want their their words to appear? So we take care of the persuasion element, but also we see that with the words and phrases that

    John Jantsch (11:14.739)

    Yeah, yeah.

    John Jantsch (11:25.885)

    Mm.

    Jon Benson (11:35.681)

    are closer to who they are as a person. So it starts feeling more human. It’s important.

    John Jantsch (11:40.457)

    Yeah, it’s interesting. know as we’ve worked with clients, you know, a lot of them have a fairly large body of work of them talking about things, explaining their products, being who they are. And that element, you know, allows you to build that voice or that brand. But then there is a technical framework element to it as well, isn’t it?

    Jon Benson (11:58.348)

    yeah, totally. mean, if you go too far outside that framework, you’re going to lose a lot of the things that we already know work so well, persuasion wise. So the goal is not to try to convince somebody of something, it’s to compel them to take action on what they already hold valuable. So all you’re doing is aligning your offer with what they already hold to be valuable. And that’s the skill of copywriting. that’s something that AI is, I think, obviously I’m biased.

    John Jantsch (12:05.639)

    Yeah. Yeah.

    Jon Benson (12:27.481)

    So I’m gonna say we’re kind of the exception, but AI in general has gotten a little better at this. I’d like to think we’ve led some of the way in that, to getting to where there’s more of that human element involved.

    John Jantsch (12:39.091)

    So talk a little bit about that because there’s certainly a lot of people, creatives in particular, that have felt like they have this special sauce, this special talent to create that content, to create beauty, to create things. And maybe AI has kind of taken that. I mean, it’s eventually going to get good at doing video and graphics and things. So where is the human element, know, remain?

    Jon Benson (12:57.314)

    Mm-hmm.

    Yeah, yeah.

    So think of it as like, I look at it as the difference between using a hammer and using a jackhammer or something that’s a powered hammer, right? It’s a pneumonic hammer or whatever they call those automatic hammers. So you’ve got an automatic hammer and there’s a skill to hitting a nail with a hammer, right? The question is, as a carpenter, is that really what you want to be known for is I strike a nail head perfectly with a hammer every single time.

    Or if you could have that done for you instantaneously with something that just tapped it in, what would you do with the time that you have left now? You would probably spend that doing the creative portion of things and like, I can do this, I can build this. And this is what the same thing is true of AI and copywriters. It’s like, we’re not trying to put people out of business. We’re giving them the ultimate power tools. So a lot of the grunt work, a lot of the research, a lot of the structure you don’t have to worry about. Then you can go in and finesse it.

    and everything sounds so much better when you do that. We want people to do that. there’s still a knowledge factor that I think that copywriters need to have. And sure, some people do use tools like Vinson. They just don’t think about it. They click a few buttons and they go, because it works. But the copywriters, they want to put their signature on it. And this just gives you the ultimate way of doing that. It’s like hiring the best ghostwriter you can think of. So if I hired a copywriter to write something for me and they sent it back and I read it, went, wow, that’s just freaking fantastic.

    Jon Benson (14:26.768)

    then I could find these little bitty things in there that I only know or that I primarily know. And then I’m gonna go, oh, you I’m gonna change this over here. And then I might find a creative thing that he said or she said that I wouldn’t have thought of. And that now becomes a campaign. My mind goes, oh, wow, I didn’t think about that. I can turn this into a campaign. Well, that’s not AI, that’s me, right? So if the AI wrote it or a human wrote it, wouldn’t matter. And so that’s what we do that’s a little different because we coach people live once a week so that we can help inspire them to.

    Use the words that are coming out and how can we use it to help market their business more effectively.

    John Jantsch (15:01.011)

    So I think one of the areas that obviously is a breakthrough is in testing. Obviously, any copywriter worth their salt is like, I think this is good, but let’s test it, right? And now we can test 200 versions for not much more time than it took us to create that one beautiful one. What do you think that that is going to ultimately do in terms of people’s effectiveness?

    Jon Benson (15:07.088)

    Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (15:15.087)

    Right.

    Jon Benson (15:26.992)

    If people knew what the guys that are making hundreds of millions of dollars at this stuff do, if you knew the amount of testing that went into it, most people would just give up. would stop. I’ll give you an example. I have a good friend of mine that is the top of their industry on meta and they flew out to meet the actual real meta heads of ads because there’s the ones that they give people and there were ones that give these people.

    You know, they give them $100,000 to spend just to play with just because we want to see what your new creative team can do. They will run 800 ads at a time in any given month. They’re running 800 versions of an ad. So there’s just no way to do that effectively without AI. that’s when they were the early adopters to this. Now they can run those kinds of things. And it’s like, they can figure out what works and guess what? One or two might scale or three. It’s, it’s, doesn’t matter how good the writers are.

    It’s like some hook, some angle may work and that angle if it works can just skyrocket a business. So I think it’s one of the best things about AI is the ability to split test leads of a sales letter or VSL, the split test, obviously campaigns and then add campaigns and things like that. It’s very helpful.

    John Jantsch (16:37.907)

    So you’ve spent a lot of time building a reputation about ethical persuasion, but it’s not a very far leap to go to things that are maybe not that ethical, right? To go from just what you talked about as getting people to do something that they want to do or that’s good for them and they just, they need to hear it, to manipulation. So, and I feel like

    Jon Benson (16:43.12)

    Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (16:55.346)

    yeah.

    Jon Benson (17:01.796)

    Right.

    Right.

    John Jantsch (17:07.503)

    AI doesn’t really care in some cases. how do you, what are the guard rails that you really use to kind of stay within what, you you talked about beliefs, your beliefs.

    Jon Benson (17:10.072)

    Mm-mm. Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (17:20.24)

    Yeah, well the guardrails I use that we actually that’s a technical term and we use specific guardrails in our agents that are that when somebody sets up Benson correctly, we use it’s called a buyer alignment profile that we have people go through. In fact, I’m going to give it to your listeners for free that could go through that and get their buyer alignment, which is a 15 page report of the words and phrases you should use and not use. And that exactly fits that bill of that sets up guardrails. It’s like use this because I value X, Y and Z. What do the words of I

    value X, Y, and Z translate to in copywriting lingo? Because it doesn’t mean like if I value freedom, you don’t want to use like, hey, since you love freedom as much as I do, then you’re going to love so and so shoes. That doesn’t make any sense, right? And so it’s just too hamfisted and heavy handed and all that stuff. So what phrases do people that love freedom as a core value? What usage would they use and what would they never say? And it’s what they would never say that the Garbrills of that. So in other words, that prevents the

    John Jantsch (17:58.441)

    All right.

    Jon Benson (18:16.913)

    AI from going over the balcony, so to say, when it comes down to overly persuasive language.

    John Jantsch (18:23.251)

    So for some of the folks that you’ve worked with, you’ve probably started to catalog kind some of the biggest mistakes people are doing, making right now using AI. Where do you see people really need to make a shift to make AI more effective for them?

    Jon Benson (18:40.579)

    it’s it to stop thinking of AI as the answer and start thinking of it as a tool is a huge step in the right direction. Also to train whatever AI you’re using. Ours is built to be trained, so it’s copy paste kind of thing. But if you’re going to use Claude or chat GPT or whatever, you need to be able to train it with who you are, what your values are, how what words or phrases to use, what not to use. And you’ll find that the memory on this is pretty short. So.

    unless you know what you’re doing and then we can get into things like instances of open claw and the clawed code and all that stuff. That’s very technical and most people don’t want to go down that rabbit hole. mean, our guys go down that rabbit hole because we’re kind of geeky when it comes to that. But most people want just the best answers that they can without having to become a software engineer. so to do that, yeah, it’s a lot of knowledge. It’s a lot of like time to say, here’s who I am.

    John Jantsch (19:08.713)

    Mm.

    John Jantsch (19:15.774)

    Yeah.

    John Jantsch (19:29.822)

    me

    Jon Benson (19:33.774)

    And here’s what I want you to do. Now, you can do that to a limited degree in chat and cloud and tools like that. You can do it to a huge degree in our tool because we built it to do that. And that’s super important to get the language patterns down. But also, and this is the last thing I’ll say, but this is true of copywriting in general. So when people used to hire me, because I don’t write copy anymore. I’m solely focused on Benson. when people used to hire me, it was very expensive. I was like.

    the probably the most expensive guy in the world for like five or 10 years. And they’re certainly one of the most expensive guys in the world. And they would hire me and I would give them a first draft of something like usually a BSL or a sales letter. And they would say, this doesn’t sound like me. go, yeah, I know. It’s because you suck. Yeah, you don’t want to sound like yourself, man. You really don’t. it’s and it’s like, I, I mean, that in kind of a funny way. It’s like you’re the copy they were writing was just terrible.

    And so they were trying to make their terrible copy kind of polish, you know, a poly put, put lipstick on a pig’s episode. So you can’t do that. You have to like be able to understand some basic persuasion and then work in. And this is what I didn’t do when I was a pro when I was writing early days of copywriting work in their values. I figured this out later in my career. It’s like, I can work in their value statements and figure out what the words are. But that was just tons of research. We’d charge like 15, 20 grand just to do the research to figure out like

    John Jantsch (20:33.415)

    Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (20:58.491)

    What are the words we should use and shouldn’t use and phrases and all that stuff. And unless somebody came along that was like an identical client, we’d have to do that all the time. Now it’s automatic, which is fantastic.

    John Jantsch (21:06.473)

    Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Well, John, I appreciate you dropping by the duct tape marketing podcast. Is there someplace you mentioned that you had a gift you wanted to invite people? And obviously I’d love to know where they can find out more about Benson.

    Jon Benson (21:15.471)

    Yeah. Yeah. Sure. If you go to free buyer profile.com, that’s free buyer profile.com. You can take our buyer alignment profile, which will test to figure out your core values, help you figure them out. We use a lot of different standardized testing models in these questions. And in about 10 to 15 minutes, we’ll get you a report.

    that you can use in your marketing that will tell you words and phrases that you should think about using and words and phrases you should definitely avoid. will give you all the NLP, all the magic sauce while still sounding like you and will also help elucidate what you already hold valuable and the people that

    John Jantsch (21:53.481)

    Great tool for training any AI tool, suspect, that you’re going to use. Awesome. Well, again, I appreciate you dropping by. It’s freebuyerprofile.com and hopefully we’ll run into you one of these days out there on the road,

    Jon Benson (21:57.125)

    Yeah, definitely. Yeah.

    Hmm.

    Mm-hmm.

    Thank you, John. I appreciate the time.

    powered by

  • Design for Amiability: Lessons from Vienna

    Design for Amiability: Lessons from Vienna

    Today’s web is not always an amiable place. Sites greet you with a popover that demands assent to their cookie policy, and leave you with Taboola ads promising “One Weird Trick!” to cure your ailments. Social media sites are tuned for engagement, and few things are more engaging than a fight. Today it seems that people want to quarrel; I have seen flame wars among birders.  

    These tensions are often at odds with a site’s goals. If we are providing support and advice to customers, we don’t want those customers to wrangle with each other. If we offer news about the latest research, we want readers to feel at ease; if we promote upcoming marches, we want our core supporters to feel comfortable and we want curious newcomers to feel welcome. 

    In a study for a conference on the History of the Web, I looked to the origins of Computer Science in Vienna (1928-1934)  for a case study of the importance of amiability in a research community and the disastrous consequences of its loss. That story has interesting implications for web environments that promote amiable interaction among disparate, difficult (and sometimes disagreeable) people.

    The Vienna Circle

    Though people had been thinking about calculating engines and thinking machines from antiquity, Computing really got going in Depression-era Vienna.  The people who worked out the theory had no interest in building machines; they wanted to puzzle out the limits of reason in the absence of divine authority. If we could not rely on God or Aristotle to tell us how to think, could we instead build arguments that were self-contained and demonstrably correct? Can we be sure that mathematics is consistent? Are there things that are true but that cannot be expressed in language? 

    The core ideas were worked out in the weekly meetings (Thursdays at 6) of a group remembered as the Vienna Circle. They got together in the office of Professor Moritz Schlick at the University of Vienna to discuss problems in philosophy, math, and language. The intersection of physics and philosophy had long been a specialty of this Vienna department, and this work had placed them among the world leaders.  Schlick’s colleague Hans Hahn was a central participant, and by 1928 Hahn brought along his graduate students Karl Menger and Kurt Gödel. Other frequent participants included philosopher Rudolf Carnap, psychologist Karl Popper, economist Ludwig von Mises (brought by his brother Frederick, a physicist),  graphic designer Otto Neurath (inventor of infographics), and architect Josef Frank (brought by his physicist brother, Phillip).  Out-of-town visitors often joined, including the young Johnny von Neumann, Alfred Tarski, and the irascible Ludwig Wittgenstein. 

    When Schlick’s office grew too dim, participants adjourned to a nearby café for additional discussion with an even larger circle of participants.  This convivial circle was far from unique.  An intersecting circle–Neurath, von Mises, Oskar Morgenstern–established the Austrian School of free-market economics. There were theatrical circles (Peter Lorre, Hedy Lamarr, Max Reinhardt), and literary circles. The café was where things happened.

    The interdisciplinarity of the group posed real challenges of temperament and understanding. Personalities were often a challenge. Gödel was convinced people were trying to poison him. Architect Josef Frank depended on contracts for public housing, which Mises opposed as wasteful. Wittgenstein’s temper had lost him his job as a secondary school teacher, and for some of these years he maintained a detailed list of whom he was willing to meet. Neurath was eager to detect muddled thinking and would interrupt a speaker with a shouted “Metaphysics!” The continuing amity of these meetings was facilitated by the personality of their leader, Moritz Schlick, who would be remembered as notably adept in keeping disagreements from becoming quarrels.

    In the Café

    The Viennese café of this era was long remembered as a particularly good place to argue with your friends, to read, and to write. Built to serve an imperial capital, the cafés found themselves with too much space and too few customers now that the Empire was gone. There was no need to turn tables: a café could only survive by coaxing customers to linger. Perhaps they would order another coffee, or one of their friends might drop by. One could play chess, or billiards, or read newspapers from abroad. Coffee was invariably served with a glass of purified spring water, still a novelty in an era in which most water was still unsafe to drink. That water glass would be refilled indefinitely. 

    In the basement of one café, the poet Jura Soyfer staged “The End Of The World,” a musical comedy in which Professor Peep has discovered a comet heading for earth.

    Prof. Peep: The comet is going to destroy everybody!

    Hitler:  Destroying everybody is my business.

    Of course, coffee can be prepared in many ways, and the Viennese café developed a broad vocabulary to represent precisely how one preferred to drink it: melange, Einspänner, Brauner, Schwarzer, Kapuziner. This extensive customization, with correspondingly esoteric conventions of service, established the café as a comfortable and personal third space, a neutral ground in which anyone who could afford a coffee would be welcome. Viennese of this era were fastidious in their use of personal titles, of which an abundance were in common use. Café waiters greeted regular customers with titles too, but were careful to address their patrons with titles a notch or two greater than they deserved. A graduate student would be Doktor, an unpaid postdoc Professor.  This assurance mattered all the more because so many members of the Circle (and so many other Viennese) came from elsewhere: Carnap from Wuppertal, Gödel from Brno, von Neumann from Budapest. No one was going to make fun of your clothes, mannerisms, or accent. Your friends wouldn’t be bothered by the pram in the hall. Everyone shared a Germanic Austrian literary and philosophical culture, not least those whose ancestors had been Eastern European Jews who knew that culture well, having read all about it in books.

    The amiability of the café circle was enhanced by its openness. Because the circle sometimes extended to architects and actors, people could feel less constrained to admit shortfalls in their understanding. It was soon discovered that marble tabletops made a useful surface for pencil sketches, serving all as an improvised and accessible blackboard.

    Comedies like “The End Of The World” and fictional newspaper sketches or feuilletons of writers like Joseph Roth and Stefan Zweig served as a second defense against disagreeable or churlish behavior. The knowledge that, if one got carried away, a parody of one’s remarks might shortly appear in Neue Freie Presse surely helped Professor Schlick keep matters in hand.

    The End Of Red Vienna

    Though Austria’s government drifted to the right after the War, Vienna’s city council had been Socialist, dedicated to public housing based on user-centered design, and embracing  ambitious programs of public outreach and adult education. In 1934 the Socialists lost a local election, and this era soon came to its end as the new administration focused on the imagined threat of the International Jewish Conspiracy. Most members of the Circle fled within months: von Neumann to Princeton, Neurath to Holland and Oxford, Popper to New Zealand, Carnap to Chicago. Prof. Schlick was murdered on the steps of the University by a student outraged by his former association with Jews.  Jura Soyfer, who wrote “The End Of The World,” died in Buchenwald.

    In 1939, von Neumann finally convinced Gödel to accept a job in Princeton. Gödel was required to pay large fines to emigrate. The officer in charge of these fees would look back on this as the best posting of his career; his name was Eichmann.

    Design for Amiability

    An impressive literature recounts those discussions and the environment that facilitated the development of computing. How can we design for amiability?  This is not just a matter of choosing rounded typefaces and a cheerful pastel palette. I believe we may identify eight distinct issues that exert design forces in usefully amiable directions.

    Seriousness: The Vienna Circle was wrestling with a notoriously difficult book—Wittgenstein’s Tractus Logico-Philosophicus—and a catalog of outstanding open questions in mathematics. They were concerned with consequential problems, not merely scoring points for debating. Constant reminders that the questions you are considering matter—not only that they are consequential or that those opposing you are scoundrels—help promote amity.

    Empiricism: The characteristic approach of the Vienna Circle demanded that knowledge be grounded either in direct observation or in rigorous reasoning. Disagreement, when it arose, could be settled by observation or by proof. If neither seemed ready to hand, the matter could not be settled. On these terms, one can seldom if ever demolish an opposing argument, and trolling is pointless.

    Abstraction: Disputes grow worse when losing the argument entails lost face or lost jobs. The Vienna Circle’s focus on theory—the limits of mathematics, the capability of language—promoted amity. Without seriousness, abstraction could have been merely academic, but the limits of reason and the consistency of mathematics were clearly serious.

    Formality: The punctilious demeanor of waiters and the elaborated rituals of coffee service helped to establish orderly attitudes amongst the argumentative participants. This stands in contrast to the contemptuous sneer that now dominates social media.  

    Schlamperei: Members of the Vienna Circle maintained a global correspondence, and they knew their work was at the frontier of research. Still, this was Vienna, at the margins of Europe: old-fashioned, frumpy, and dingy. Many participants came from even more obscure backwaters. Most or all harbored the suspicion that they were really schleppers, and a tinge of the ridiculous helped to moderate tempers. The director of “The End Of The World” had to pass the hat for money to purchase a moon for the set, and thought it was funny enough to write up for publication.

    Openness: All sorts of people were involved in discussion, anyone might join in. Each week would bring different participants. Fluid borders reduce tension, and provide opportunities to broaden the range of discussion and the terms of engagement. Low entrance friction was characteristic of the café: anyone could come, and if you came twice you were virtually a regular. Permeable boundaries and café culture made it easier for moderating influences to draw in raconteurs and storytellers to defuse awkward moments, and Vienna’s cafés had no shortage of humorists. Openness counteracts the suspicion that promoters of amiability are exerting censorship.

    Parody: The environs of the Circle—the university office and the café—were unmistakably public. There were writers about, some of them renowned humorists. The prospect that one’s bad taste or bad behavior might be ridiculed in print kept discussion within bounds. The sanction of public humiliation, however, was itself made mild by the veneer of fiction; even if you got a little carried away and a character based on you made a splash in some newspaper fiction, it wasn’t the end of the world.

    Engagement: The subject matter was important to the participants, but it was esoteric: it did not matter very much to their mothers or their siblings. A small stumble or a minor humiliation could be shrugged off in ways that major media confrontations cannot.

    I believe it is notable that this environment was designed to promote amiability through several different voices.  The café waiter flattered each newcomer and served everyone, and also kept out local pickpockets and drunks who would be mere disruptions. Schlick and other regulars kept discussion moving and on track. The fiction writers and raconteurs—perhaps the most peripheral of the participants—kept people in a good mood and reminded them that bad behavior could make anyone ridiculous.  Crucially, each of these voices were human: you could reason with them. Algorithmic or AI moderators, however clever, are seldom perceived as reasonable. The café circles had no central authority or Moderator against whom everyone’s resentments might be focused. Even after the disaster of 1934, what people remembered were those cheerful arguments.

  • The Role of AI in Modern Copywriting

    The Role of AI in Modern Copywriting

    The Role of AI in Modern Copywriting written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

    Catch the Full Episode: Overview In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch sits down with Jon Benson, creator of the Video Sales Letter (VSL) and founder of the AI platform Benson. Jon shares how AI is reshaping the world of copywriting, not by replacing human creativity, but by amplifying it. The […]

    The Role of AI in Modern Copywriting written by John Jantsch read more at Duct Tape Marketing

    Catch the Full Episode:

    jon bensonOverview

    In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, John Jantsch sits down with Jon Benson, creator of the Video Sales Letter (VSL) and founder of the AI platform Benson. Jon shares how AI is reshaping the world of copywriting, not by replacing human creativity, but by amplifying it.

    The conversation explores the evolution of VSLs, why they continue to outperform despite industry skepticism, and how AI is changing the way marketers create, test, and optimize content at scale. Jon also dives into the importance of maintaining a human voice, building ethical persuasion frameworks, and avoiding the trap of generic AI-generated content.

    Guest Bio

    Jon Benson is a copywriter, entrepreneur, and AI innovator best known for creating the Video Sales Letter (VSL), a format that revolutionized digital marketing. With a background in persuasion and behavioral psychology, Jon has spent decades refining ethical copywriting techniques. He is the founder of Benson, an AI platform trained on high-converting campaigns designed to help businesses create more effective, human-centered marketing.

    Key Takeaways

    1. AI Should Amplify Creativity, Not Replace It

    The real opportunity with AI is turning marketers into better editors, strategists, and decision-makers, not eliminating the human role.

    2. VSLs Still Work After 20 Years

    Despite claims that they’re outdated, VSLs continue to drive strong results when built on solid messaging and persuasive structure.

    3. Words Matter More Than Format

    Whether it’s video, text, or ads, the effectiveness of marketing still comes down to the quality of the words and messaging.

    4. Most AI Content Fails Due to Lack of Input

    Generic prompts produce generic results. AI needs context, personality, and values to generate effective copy.

    5. Personality and Values Drive Connection

    Great marketing aligns with what customers already believe and value, rather than trying to force persuasion.

    6. AI Enables Massive Scale in Testing

    Top marketers run hundreds of variations simultaneously, something only possible at scale with AI.

    7. Ethical Persuasion Requires Guardrails

    Without clear boundaries, AI can drift into manipulative messaging. Defining what to say and what not to say is critical.

    8. AI Is a Power Tool, Not a Replacement

    Like upgrading from a hammer to a power tool, AI removes manual effort so humans can focus on higher-level creativity.

    9. Training AI Is Essential

    To get quality output, users must teach AI their voice, values, and audience rather than relying on default behavior.

    10. Copywriting Still Requires Strategy

    Even with AI, understanding persuasion fundamentals and customer psychology remains essential.

    Great Moments

    00:01 – AI as a Creative Multiplier
    John introduces the idea that AI enhances, not replaces, human creativity.

    01:16 – The Birth of the VSL
    Jon shares how Video Sales Letters transformed his career and the marketing landscape.

    04:08 – Early Adoption of AI in Copywriting
    Jon explains his long-term vision for AI-powered copy tools.

    06:21 – Are VSLs Overused?
    Why VSLs continue to perform despite years of skepticism.

    08:46 – Why Words Still Win
    The importance of messaging over format in marketing success.

    09:11 – The Problem with Generic AI Content
    Why most AI-generated content feels robotic and ineffective.

    11:40 – The Role of Personality in Copy
    How values and voice shape better marketing outcomes.

    14:26 – AI as a Creative Partner
    Using AI to enhance, not replace, human creativity.

    16:37 – The Power of Testing at Scale
    How AI enables massive experimentation and optimization.

    18:23 – Ethical Guardrails in AI Marketing
    Why defining boundaries is essential for responsible persuasion.

    Memorable Quotes

    “The words are the consistent thing. If the words don’t reflect a human, people sense it immediately.”

    “AI isn’t the answer, it’s a tool. You still need to bring strategy and voice to it.”

    “You’re not trying to convince people, you’re aligning with what they already value.”

    “Think of AI as a power tool, it removes the grunt work so you can focus on creativity.”

    John Jantsch (00:01.651)

    So what if the real opportunity with AI is not replacing human creativity but expanding it by turning entrepreneurs into better editors, directors, and decision makers? Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duck Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jantsch. My guest today is Jon Benson. He’s a copywriter, entrepreneur, and AI pioneer best known for creating the video sales letter, one of those terms that people just use like it’s been around forever.

    A format that shapes modern digital marketing. is long centered on ethical persuasion and authentic connection. And more recently, he developed BNSN, an AI platform trained on high converting campaigns for small businesses. So John, welcome to the show.

    Jon Benson (00:29.9)

    Yeah.

    Jon Benson (00:47.212)

    Hey, John. Thanks for having me.

    John Jantsch (00:49.585)

    So let’s, I assume you have to do this a little bit of your time when you go on shows like this, but the term VSL, you know, is kind of entered the, the marketing vernacular. Talk to me a little bit about, I’ve been doing this for 30 years. That was probably 12, 15 years ago, really, when that kind of burst on the scene as an innovation. You want to talk a little bit about what that’s done to your trajectory, I suppose.

    Jon Benson (00:55.202)

    Mm-hmm. Yeah. yeah.

    Jon Benson (01:02.04)

    Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (01:16.216)

    Yeah, believe it or not, it’s 20 years old this year. So 2006. Yeah. Yeah. Crazy. It’s, mean, it was, it, yeah, everything changed that the, day that happened, the 30 days later, everything changed from my offer that I did it for, you know, we went from like struggling onto my second book that I wrote in, in fitness and then went to a million dollars.

    John Jantsch (01:18.537)

    20 years, okay.

    Jon Benson (01:39.886)

    a week and a month rather in traffic cost, you people buying that kind of money and going up to even higher than that. So it was crazy. And then, and then all of people started calling me and asking me to write VSLs for them. And I’m not, I wasn’t a copywriter. that’s not, never been my claim to fame until after this happened. And then I had to get good at writing copy. So that’s what happened.

    John Jantsch (02:01.939)

    That’s funny. So you said you had written a book about gym ownership? Is that what you said?

    Jon Benson (02:10.663)

    I’ve written six books in fitness, so weight loss, fitness, bodybuilding, yeah, so that whole thing has been a passion.

    John Jantsch (02:12.947)

    Fitness, fitness, okay. Okay, so are you one of those people that that was your passion and you just had to learn how to do marketing? And so this whole idea of studying persuasion and conversion and innovation, is that something that was really just picked up because you’re like, I better get good at that?

    Jon Benson (02:24.748)

    Yeah.

    Jon Benson (02:34.478)

    It was picked up specifically for copywriting, yes, but I studied persuasion in college. Actually, I was studying MLP in college. I was fascinated by how you can basically get people to listen to you and hear what you’re actually trying to communicate and motivate them to make changes based on things that you believe at least are good for them. So you’re not trying to manipulate them. You’re just trying to motivate them. And I was always into like, how can I motivate and connect with people deeper? So I studied the MLP back then, way back then.

    John Jantsch (02:39.731)

    Mm.

    Jon Benson (03:03.22)

    and mail order course from, from Bandler. And that got me into Tony Robbins and that led me into even deeper persuasion issues. And, and just was always really fascinated by it. And that led to me being into the advertising world. And that would, that led eventually to writing a book with it. Yeah. I actually would have the book thing came about because I’d always been passionate about, bodybuilding and fitness and things like that growing up and athlete. I was an athlete most of my life. And then

    ended up sedentary and got ended up obese in my late 20s and early 30s. I had 50 inch waist and had a heart attack at 38. So I was like, it was like a train wreck of health. And that got me back into it. So that’s the Fit Over 40 book was written based on that, on turning that around. And then I interviewed a bunch of other people because I didn’t think I was enough for a book. So I did 52 people that did the same.

    John Jantsch (03:55.283)

    So I’m curious, this is a question, unfortunately, I feel like I’m asking almost every guest these days, but how has AI changed that element of copywriting for good or bad?

    Jon Benson (04:00.942)

    It’s

    Jon Benson (04:08.494)

    So my goal with AI and copywriting, I’ve been doing copywriting software since 2010. So this is going to date me a lot, but in AI, in early nascent AI in 2017 and working with early LLMs in 2019. So very, very, very early into this thing and trying to convince everybody, this was the thing that we wanted to do. And the reason why is because I was, I had these courses that I would teach people how to write VSOs and I knew how hard it was for me to learn all the copywriting in and outs and

    and develop my own style, which I did. And I said, well, what, what if I could have software that would do it for them? And the average business owner doesn’t have time to do that. They just want the copy that converts. So I’ve seen it from 15 years away going, I know this is going to happen eventually. And so we decided that the software is pronounced Benson. That’s not my last name. It’s just my last name without the vowels. And, and yeah, yeah, but it’s, cool that you can spell it out. That’s all right. and so we did Benson originally, it was going to be called,

    John Jantsch (04:56.529)

    okay. Not BNSM like I butchered it, okay?

    Jon Benson (05:06.35)

    It was going to, because it was the first AI to actually write a long form VSL. And I was working with, with Jasper at the time they were called Jarvis, but I was the first guy in the copywriter to train anything on an LLM. And they ended up with a 62nd VSL out of all the training. I think, yeah, I think we can do this in a different way. And we ended up being, you know, having a 7,000 word VSL come out of our AI and it sounded like a real VSL.

    John Jantsch (05:14.729)

    Sure, yeah.

    Jon Benson (05:32.663)

    It didn’t sound like chat, GBT, it didn’t sound like Claude, it sounded like a real VSL. And so that was our claim to fame. And since then we just, of course got, we were very early into the agentic phase. So we’ve just gotten better and better at that. And so my goal was to replace myself. That’s what I wanted to do. I wanted to say, if I can, if I can use this to write a VSL, which I have, sells pages for my own stuff, which I have, then I know that it’s going to be good enough to, for prime time. And that was the, that was the goal to do. yeah.

    John Jantsch (06:02.549)

    So talk to, obviously we’ve got more to explore in AI, but talk to me a little bit about the VSL itself. mean, it has become very mainstream. I mean, you hear people talk about it, whether they know what it is or not. They talk about it as part of their funnel, you know, today. So is it overdone? I mean, is it over?

    Jon Benson (06:06.094)

    Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (06:10.316)

    Mm. Yep.

    yeah.

    Jon Benson (06:21.806)

    Yeah, every year I hear that I’ve heard that for 20 years. So it literally 20 years. So the first year I came out with it and said, Oh, it’s already and then Ryan Dias, who’s a good friend of mine made the mistake of saying when he came out and promoted his own little mini VSO course and he later gave me credit for which was really nice of him and everything. But he said, Oh, sales letters are dead. You’ll never do another sales. And I’m like, dude, I’ve never said that, you know, I think everything works if you let it and VSO is just happened to keep on working and they just ask, ask Agora.

    John Jantsch (06:24.157)

    Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

    Jon Benson (06:51.022)

    They work. I mean, yeah, they work. They work really well and now people are using BSLs in feed So you’ve got the meta ads that are basically short BSLs that use the same psychology Just compressed into five two to five minutes. So we’ve been doing that for 15 years as well So yeah, and then they go to a longer BSL So they they still work just as sales pages work just as webinars can work everything can work It just depends on what you’re wanting to sell and how you’re and how you approach it But the words are the consistent thing

    So if the words aren’t there, if the words don’t reflect an actual human underneath it, people sense it a mile away, which was our goal with Benson was to create humanized AI. How do we do this? How do we create AI that doesn’t sound robotic? It doesn’t sound like, you know, chat GPT writing an email, it’s asking a rhetorical question. And the very first sentence, you know, this kind of really bad AI copy that we see all the time. How do we do this and actually sound like a real A-list copywriter? And that was, that’s been our focus for three and a half years now.

    John Jantsch (07:20.456)

    Yeah.

    John Jantsch (07:48.413)

    You know, initially the large innovation was that it was not a talking head on video. It was the words. Is that a key component of it?

    Jon Benson (07:56.174)

    Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (08:01.113)

    You know, it depends on what you’re trying to sell. We have seen split tests with video beating words only, and we’ve seen words only beat video. It really depends on what it is. And what works today, a year from now, will be something you want to reverse. So for a while there was like my friend Craig who writes for Golden Hippo, and he’s done amazingly well building a billion dollar company from, he’s an amazing writer. But he was one of the first guys working with Gundry to do a lot of video.

    on the front end of a VSL, but talking to him behind the scenes, so to say, we know that it’s still like a Google Doc and the words are everything. So he slaves over the words, man, getting the words just right. So all the video in the world is not gonna save you if your words suck. It just isn’t gonna happen. So the words are still the most important.

    John Jantsch (08:46.077)

    Yeah, yeah, yeah.

    So one of the knocks on AI, of course, is it’s made it very easy for people to create really crappy content. you see it all the time now, right? It’s like volumes of really bad content. So why can’t people create better content? What’s the mistake they’re making? Is it simply just a matter of being lazy?

    Jon Benson (08:54.831)

    Yeah, yeah.

    Yeah.

    Yeah.

    Jon Benson (09:11.983)

    No, it’s the matter of the LLMs or the in our case, it’s the agents not knowing you. And this is where it gets a little bit a little bit hairy for people, because there has to be an element of your personality that’s OK to be known. as the same thing would be true if you went and hired me as a copywriter. Like I would ask you if you had an offer and you wanted to whatever your offer would be. I would start asking you lots of questions that you probably don’t think is related to your offer.

    John Jantsch (09:19.719)

    Yeah, yeah,

    Jon Benson (09:40.336)

    Now I’m not talking about like when asking all these really intensive personal questions, but I want to know what your values are. I want to know where you stand. Who do you want to attract as customers? What are you against? What are you not just what the, what the product does? Cause the product or the offer, whatever it does, I that’s, that’s not that difficult. Um, what’s difficult is to make that story resonate with people that will automatically hear and go, Oh, that sounds like something that I can automatically relate to. And that’s what a really good copy. does. We don’t try to sell people that are

    not interested or just completely need to go from a level one to a level five awareness, that’s really not what we wanna do. We wanna target people that are already there, because you got plenty of people like that, but if you write, if you go into a chat or clod or whatever and you say, write me an email or write me an ad or rep me a VSO, and they don’t know who you are, they don’t have a good feel of your words, feel of your personality, it’s gonna write stuff that’s schlocky, because it’s trained on the internet. So if you just think about this for a moment, and everyone listening to me will get this,

    John Jantsch (10:35.294)

    Yeah, yeah.

    Jon Benson (10:39.043)

    It’s like, can you imagine training anyone to do anything by telling them, go read the internet and get back to me tomorrow? That’s what we’ve done with LLMs, right? It’s like, well, that’s going to give you a lot of knowledge, but most of it sucks. mean, so most of what’s out there in copy is terrible. So it’s learning models have been terrible. So that’s why specialty AI is like ours and in our, in our industry, you have to have it to where the people that know what they’re doing actually trained individual.

    John Jantsch (10:46.665)

    Right.

    Jon Benson (11:06.487)

    in our cases, agents that use not one LLM, but a dozen, you know, can use as many as we need one model rather, but you know, doesn’t whatever models are we know are going to be the best ones for the right tasks. So that takes that. And then what we do is a little different. We ask people to go through an assessment to figure out what are their values? Where do they stand? Who are the people they want to attract? And how do they want their their words to appear? So we take care of the persuasion element, but also we see that with the words and phrases that

    John Jantsch (11:14.739)

    Yeah, yeah.

    John Jantsch (11:25.885)

    Mm.

    Jon Benson (11:35.681)

    are closer to who they are as a person. So it starts feeling more human. It’s important.

    John Jantsch (11:40.457)

    Yeah, it’s interesting. know as we’ve worked with clients, you know, a lot of them have a fairly large body of work of them talking about things, explaining their products, being who they are. And that element, you know, allows you to build that voice or that brand. But then there is a technical framework element to it as well, isn’t it?

    Jon Benson (11:58.348)

    yeah, totally. mean, if you go too far outside that framework, you’re going to lose a lot of the things that we already know work so well, persuasion wise. So the goal is not to try to convince somebody of something, it’s to compel them to take action on what they already hold valuable. So all you’re doing is aligning your offer with what they already hold to be valuable. And that’s the skill of copywriting. that’s something that AI is, I think, obviously I’m biased.

    John Jantsch (12:05.639)

    Yeah. Yeah.

    Jon Benson (12:27.481)

    So I’m gonna say we’re kind of the exception, but AI in general has gotten a little better at this. I’d like to think we’ve led some of the way in that, to getting to where there’s more of that human element involved.

    John Jantsch (12:39.091)

    So talk a little bit about that because there’s certainly a lot of people, creatives in particular, that have felt like they have this special sauce, this special talent to create that content, to create beauty, to create things. And maybe AI has kind of taken that. I mean, it’s eventually going to get good at doing video and graphics and things. So where is the human element, know, remain?

    Jon Benson (12:57.314)

    Mm-hmm.

    Yeah, yeah.

    So think of it as like, I look at it as the difference between using a hammer and using a jackhammer or something that’s a powered hammer, right? It’s a pneumonic hammer or whatever they call those automatic hammers. So you’ve got an automatic hammer and there’s a skill to hitting a nail with a hammer, right? The question is, as a carpenter, is that really what you want to be known for is I strike a nail head perfectly with a hammer every single time.

    Or if you could have that done for you instantaneously with something that just tapped it in, what would you do with the time that you have left now? You would probably spend that doing the creative portion of things and like, I can do this, I can build this. And this is what the same thing is true of AI and copywriters. It’s like, we’re not trying to put people out of business. We’re giving them the ultimate power tools. So a lot of the grunt work, a lot of the research, a lot of the structure you don’t have to worry about. Then you can go in and finesse it.

    and everything sounds so much better when you do that. We want people to do that. there’s still a knowledge factor that I think that copywriters need to have. And sure, some people do use tools like Vinson. They just don’t think about it. They click a few buttons and they go, because it works. But the copywriters, they want to put their signature on it. And this just gives you the ultimate way of doing that. It’s like hiring the best ghostwriter you can think of. So if I hired a copywriter to write something for me and they sent it back and I read it, went, wow, that’s just freaking fantastic.

    Jon Benson (14:26.768)

    then I could find these little bitty things in there that I only know or that I primarily know. And then I’m gonna go, oh, you I’m gonna change this over here. And then I might find a creative thing that he said or she said that I wouldn’t have thought of. And that now becomes a campaign. My mind goes, oh, wow, I didn’t think about that. I can turn this into a campaign. Well, that’s not AI, that’s me, right? So if the AI wrote it or a human wrote it, wouldn’t matter. And so that’s what we do that’s a little different because we coach people live once a week so that we can help inspire them to.

    Use the words that are coming out and how can we use it to help market their business more effectively.

    John Jantsch (15:01.011)

    So I think one of the areas that obviously is a breakthrough is in testing. Obviously, any copywriter worth their salt is like, I think this is good, but let’s test it, right? And now we can test 200 versions for not much more time than it took us to create that one beautiful one. What do you think that that is going to ultimately do in terms of people’s effectiveness?

    Jon Benson (15:07.088)

    Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (15:15.087)

    Right.

    Jon Benson (15:26.992)

    If people knew what the guys that are making hundreds of millions of dollars at this stuff do, if you knew the amount of testing that went into it, most people would just give up. would stop. I’ll give you an example. I have a good friend of mine that is the top of their industry on meta and they flew out to meet the actual real meta heads of ads because there’s the ones that they give people and there were ones that give these people.

    You know, they give them $100,000 to spend just to play with just because we want to see what your new creative team can do. They will run 800 ads at a time in any given month. They’re running 800 versions of an ad. So there’s just no way to do that effectively without AI. that’s when they were the early adopters to this. Now they can run those kinds of things. And it’s like, they can figure out what works and guess what? One or two might scale or three. It’s, it’s, doesn’t matter how good the writers are.

    It’s like some hook, some angle may work and that angle if it works can just skyrocket a business. So I think it’s one of the best things about AI is the ability to split test leads of a sales letter or VSL, the split test, obviously campaigns and then add campaigns and things like that. It’s very helpful.

    John Jantsch (16:37.907)

    So you’ve spent a lot of time building a reputation about ethical persuasion, but it’s not a very far leap to go to things that are maybe not that ethical, right? To go from just what you talked about as getting people to do something that they want to do or that’s good for them and they just, they need to hear it, to manipulation. So, and I feel like

    Jon Benson (16:43.12)

    Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (16:55.346)

    yeah.

    Jon Benson (17:01.796)

    Right.

    Right.

    John Jantsch (17:07.503)

    AI doesn’t really care in some cases. how do you, what are the guard rails that you really use to kind of stay within what, you you talked about beliefs, your beliefs.

    Jon Benson (17:10.072)

    Mm-mm. Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (17:20.24)

    Yeah, well the guardrails I use that we actually that’s a technical term and we use specific guardrails in our agents that are that when somebody sets up Benson correctly, we use it’s called a buyer alignment profile that we have people go through. In fact, I’m going to give it to your listeners for free that could go through that and get their buyer alignment, which is a 15 page report of the words and phrases you should use and not use. And that exactly fits that bill of that sets up guardrails. It’s like use this because I value X, Y and Z. What do the words of I

    value X, Y, and Z translate to in copywriting lingo? Because it doesn’t mean like if I value freedom, you don’t want to use like, hey, since you love freedom as much as I do, then you’re going to love so and so shoes. That doesn’t make any sense, right? And so it’s just too hamfisted and heavy handed and all that stuff. So what phrases do people that love freedom as a core value? What usage would they use and what would they never say? And it’s what they would never say that the Garbrills of that. So in other words, that prevents the

    John Jantsch (17:58.441)

    All right.

    Jon Benson (18:16.913)

    AI from going over the balcony, so to say, when it comes down to overly persuasive language.

    John Jantsch (18:23.251)

    So for some of the folks that you’ve worked with, you’ve probably started to catalog kind some of the biggest mistakes people are doing, making right now using AI. Where do you see people really need to make a shift to make AI more effective for them?

    Jon Benson (18:40.579)

    it’s it to stop thinking of AI as the answer and start thinking of it as a tool is a huge step in the right direction. Also to train whatever AI you’re using. Ours is built to be trained, so it’s copy paste kind of thing. But if you’re going to use Claude or chat GPT or whatever, you need to be able to train it with who you are, what your values are, how what words or phrases to use, what not to use. And you’ll find that the memory on this is pretty short. So.

    unless you know what you’re doing and then we can get into things like instances of open claw and the clawed code and all that stuff. That’s very technical and most people don’t want to go down that rabbit hole. mean, our guys go down that rabbit hole because we’re kind of geeky when it comes to that. But most people want just the best answers that they can without having to become a software engineer. so to do that, yeah, it’s a lot of knowledge. It’s a lot of like time to say, here’s who I am.

    John Jantsch (19:08.713)

    Mm.

    John Jantsch (19:15.774)

    Yeah.

    John Jantsch (19:29.822)

    me

    Jon Benson (19:33.774)

    And here’s what I want you to do. Now, you can do that to a limited degree in chat and cloud and tools like that. You can do it to a huge degree in our tool because we built it to do that. And that’s super important to get the language patterns down. But also, and this is the last thing I’ll say, but this is true of copywriting in general. So when people used to hire me, because I don’t write copy anymore. I’m solely focused on Benson. when people used to hire me, it was very expensive. I was like.

    the probably the most expensive guy in the world for like five or 10 years. And they’re certainly one of the most expensive guys in the world. And they would hire me and I would give them a first draft of something like usually a BSL or a sales letter. And they would say, this doesn’t sound like me. go, yeah, I know. It’s because you suck. Yeah, you don’t want to sound like yourself, man. You really don’t. it’s and it’s like, I, I mean, that in kind of a funny way. It’s like you’re the copy they were writing was just terrible.

    And so they were trying to make their terrible copy kind of polish, you know, a poly put, put lipstick on a pig’s episode. So you can’t do that. You have to like be able to understand some basic persuasion and then work in. And this is what I didn’t do when I was a pro when I was writing early days of copywriting work in their values. I figured this out later in my career. It’s like, I can work in their value statements and figure out what the words are. But that was just tons of research. We’d charge like 15, 20 grand just to do the research to figure out like

    John Jantsch (20:33.415)

    Mm-hmm.

    Jon Benson (20:58.491)

    What are the words we should use and shouldn’t use and phrases and all that stuff. And unless somebody came along that was like an identical client, we’d have to do that all the time. Now it’s automatic, which is fantastic.

    John Jantsch (21:06.473)

    Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Well, John, I appreciate you dropping by the duct tape marketing podcast. Is there someplace you mentioned that you had a gift you wanted to invite people? And obviously I’d love to know where they can find out more about Benson.

    Jon Benson (21:15.471)

    Yeah. Yeah. Sure. If you go to free buyer profile.com, that’s free buyer profile.com. You can take our buyer alignment profile, which will test to figure out your core values, help you figure them out. We use a lot of different standardized testing models in these questions. And in about 10 to 15 minutes, we’ll get you a report.

    that you can use in your marketing that will tell you words and phrases that you should think about using and words and phrases you should definitely avoid. will give you all the NLP, all the magic sauce while still sounding like you and will also help elucidate what you already hold valuable and the people that

    John Jantsch (21:53.481)

    Great tool for training any AI tool, suspect, that you’re going to use. Awesome. Well, again, I appreciate you dropping by. It’s freebuyerprofile.com and hopefully we’ll run into you one of these days out there on the road,

    Jon Benson (21:57.125)

    Yeah, definitely. Yeah.

    Hmm.

    Mm-hmm.

    Thank you, John. I appreciate the time.

    powered by

  • Movies That Peak in the First 10 Minutes

    Movies That Peak in the First 10 Minutes

    Some movies make a powerful first impression that sets expectations sky high. The opening minutes can establish tone, introduce compelling ideas, and immediately pull the audience into the story. But when that early momentum fades, the rest of the film can feel uneven despite a strong start. These openings often remain memorable on their own, standing out for their energy, tension, or creativity. They show how effective a beginning can be, even if the overall experience doesn’t fully sustain it. These are films where the first ten minutes leave a lasting impact that the rest struggles to match.

    The post Movies That Peak in the First 10 Minutes appeared first on Den of Geek.

    As regular viewers of the FX anthology series already know, American Horror Story can be something of a mixed bag. Over the past 15 years, the series has tackled everything from serial killers and aliens to vampires, witches, ghosts, and famous true crime cases, with varying degrees of success. The show’s later seasons, in particular, have struggled to recapture the magic of the earlier outings, which saw its stars — most notably Oscar winner Jessica Lange — racking up awards season nominations and hardware. (In fact, if you haven’t seen them, you should probably just skip AHS: Delicate and AHS: Double Feature entirely.) 

    But the franchise certainly seems on an upswing again with its forthcoming 13th season, which will bring back many of the franchise’s most popular regular players, including Sarah Paulson, Kathy Bates, Angela Bassett, Evan Peters, Emma Roberts, Billie Lourd, Gabourey Sidibe and Leslie Grossman, while adding Arianna Grande (who starred in Murphy’s wildly underrated Scream Queens) to the mix.

    But, and perhaps most importantly for fans: Lange herself will be back this season, for the first time in a regular capacity since season 4’s Freak Show

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    Lange’s long-awaited return is probably already enough to get the most lapsed of AHS viewers to return to the fold. But now that it appears the show is going to return to the world of one of its most popular installments? Heck yeah, sign us up.

    Creator Ryan Murphy has been cagey about what sort of story this Avengers: Doomsday-level season is likely to tell. But thanks to the events of American Horror Story: Apocalypse, any Coven follow-up has plenty of options. The ending of Apocalypse essentially erased or rewrote many events across the anthology’s interconnected timeline. The witch Mallory (Lourd) was sent back into the past, where she killed Michael Langdon (Cody Fern), the Antichrist child born at the end of the series’ original installment, Murder House

    His death not only prevented the apocalypse of season 8’s title, but also resurrected many dearly departed Coven characters, including Paulson’s Supreme with Cordelia Foxx, and her fellow witches Misty Day (Lily Rabe), Zoe Benson (Taissa Farmiga), and Queenie (Sidibe). It also revived Lange’s Constance Langdon, the grand dame of the infamous Hollywood murder mansion. Basically, at this point, any character who wasn’t already canonically a ghost at the end of the show’s first season is probably back on the table for a potential appearance in this presumed sequel series. 

    Set images from Murphy’s production company have confirmed that Paulson and Roberts are reprising their respective Coven characters, and while there’s no official word about whether Lange is returning as Constance, the set images that have been shared sure look a whole lot like it. (That is not a Fiona Goode hairdo, is what I’m saying.) Does this mean we won’t see Fiona again? Never say never — if Madison Montgomery can be sprung from her department store hell, there’s no reason to assume Fiona can’t be similarly freed from her eternal prison of knotty pine.

    Mallory has already been theoretically established as Cordelia’s successor and the next Supreme witch, so the question of what new danger or drama arises at New Orleans’s infamous Robichaux Academy is still up in the air.

    But we won’t have to wait that long to find out — Murphy has already confirmed the new season will arrive in September, just in time for spooky season. 

    The post American Horror Story Season 13 Is Shaping Up to Be a Timeline-Shifting Coven Follow-Up appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • 15 Movie Facts More Unsettling Than Informative

    15 Movie Facts More Unsettling Than Informative

    Not all movie trivia is fun to learn. Some behind-the-scenes facts and production details leave a very different kind of impression, the kind that lingers for the wrong reasons. Whether its actors pushed beyond their limits, dangerous filming conditions, or creative decisions that raise uncomfortable questions, these stories add a layer to certain films that can be hard to ignore.

    In some cases, the reality of what happened off camera is more unsettling than anything shown on screen. These are the kinds of facts that, while slightly informative, change how you see the movie entirely.

    The post 15 Movie Facts More Unsettling Than Informative appeared first on Den of Geek.

    As regular viewers of the FX anthology series already know, American Horror Story can be something of a mixed bag. Over the past 15 years, the series has tackled everything from serial killers and aliens to vampires, witches, ghosts, and famous true crime cases, with varying degrees of success. The show’s later seasons, in particular, have struggled to recapture the magic of the earlier outings, which saw its stars — most notably Oscar winner Jessica Lange — racking up awards season nominations and hardware. (In fact, if you haven’t seen them, you should probably just skip AHS: Delicate and AHS: Double Feature entirely.) 

    But the franchise certainly seems on an upswing again with its forthcoming 13th season, which will bring back many of the franchise’s most popular regular players, including Sarah Paulson, Kathy Bates, Angela Bassett, Evan Peters, Emma Roberts, Billie Lourd, Gabourey Sidibe and Leslie Grossman, while adding Arianna Grande (who starred in Murphy’s wildly underrated Scream Queens) to the mix.

    But, and perhaps most importantly for fans: Lange herself will be back this season, for the first time in a regular capacity since season 4’s Freak Show

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    Lange’s long-awaited return is probably already enough to get the most lapsed of AHS viewers to return to the fold. But now that it appears the show is going to return to the world of one of its most popular installments? Heck yeah, sign us up.

    Creator Ryan Murphy has been cagey about what sort of story this Avengers: Doomsday-level season is likely to tell. But thanks to the events of American Horror Story: Apocalypse, any Coven follow-up has plenty of options. The ending of Apocalypse essentially erased or rewrote many events across the anthology’s interconnected timeline. The witch Mallory (Lourd) was sent back into the past, where she killed Michael Langdon (Cody Fern), the Antichrist child born at the end of the series’ original installment, Murder House

    His death not only prevented the apocalypse of season 8’s title, but also resurrected many dearly departed Coven characters, including Paulson’s Supreme with Cordelia Foxx, and her fellow witches Misty Day (Lily Rabe), Zoe Benson (Taissa Farmiga), and Queenie (Sidibe). It also revived Lange’s Constance Langdon, the grand dame of the infamous Hollywood murder mansion. Basically, at this point, any character who wasn’t already canonically a ghost at the end of the show’s first season is probably back on the table for a potential appearance in this presumed sequel series. 

    Set images from Murphy’s production company have confirmed that Paulson and Roberts are reprising their respective Coven characters, and while there’s no official word about whether Lange is returning as Constance, the set images that have been shared sure look a whole lot like it. (That is not a Fiona Goode hairdo, is what I’m saying.) Does this mean we won’t see Fiona again? Never say never — if Madison Montgomery can be sprung from her department store hell, there’s no reason to assume Fiona can’t be similarly freed from her eternal prison of knotty pine.

    Mallory has already been theoretically established as Cordelia’s successor and the next Supreme witch, so the question of what new danger or drama arises at New Orleans’s infamous Robichaux Academy is still up in the air.

    But we won’t have to wait that long to find out — Murphy has already confirmed the new season will arrive in September, just in time for spooky season. 

    The post American Horror Story Season 13 Is Shaping Up to Be a Timeline-Shifting Coven Follow-Up appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • 15 Times Movie Critics Had to Eat Their Words

    15 Times Movie Critics Had to Eat Their Words

    It’s hard for a movie to be a hit with critics right away. In fact, some films that are now widely loved were dismissed, misunderstood, or outright panned when they first released. Over time, audiences found something critics didn’t, whether it was originality, emotional impact, or simply rewatch value.

    Through word of mouth, home releases, and changing tastes, these movies built strong reputations that outlasted their initial reviews. Looking back, it’s hard to imagine them being seen as anything less than classics or cult favorites. These are the films that proved early criticism doesn’t always tell the full story.

    The post 15 Times Movie Critics Had to Eat Their Words appeared first on Den of Geek.

    As regular viewers of the FX anthology series already know, American Horror Story can be something of a mixed bag. Over the past 15 years, the series has tackled everything from serial killers and aliens to vampires, witches, ghosts, and famous true crime cases, with varying degrees of success. The show’s later seasons, in particular, have struggled to recapture the magic of the earlier outings, which saw its stars — most notably Oscar winner Jessica Lange — racking up awards season nominations and hardware. (In fact, if you haven’t seen them, you should probably just skip AHS: Delicate and AHS: Double Feature entirely.) 

    But the franchise certainly seems on an upswing again with its forthcoming 13th season, which will bring back many of the franchise’s most popular regular players, including Sarah Paulson, Kathy Bates, Angela Bassett, Evan Peters, Emma Roberts, Billie Lourd, Gabourey Sidibe and Leslie Grossman, while adding Arianna Grande (who starred in Murphy’s wildly underrated Scream Queens) to the mix.

    But, and perhaps most importantly for fans: Lange herself will be back this season, for the first time in a regular capacity since season 4’s Freak Show

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    Lange’s long-awaited return is probably already enough to get the most lapsed of AHS viewers to return to the fold. But now that it appears the show is going to return to the world of one of its most popular installments? Heck yeah, sign us up.

    Creator Ryan Murphy has been cagey about what sort of story this Avengers: Doomsday-level season is likely to tell. But thanks to the events of American Horror Story: Apocalypse, any Coven follow-up has plenty of options. The ending of Apocalypse essentially erased or rewrote many events across the anthology’s interconnected timeline. The witch Mallory (Lourd) was sent back into the past, where she killed Michael Langdon (Cody Fern), the Antichrist child born at the end of the series’ original installment, Murder House

    His death not only prevented the apocalypse of season 8’s title, but also resurrected many dearly departed Coven characters, including Paulson’s Supreme with Cordelia Foxx, and her fellow witches Misty Day (Lily Rabe), Zoe Benson (Taissa Farmiga), and Queenie (Sidibe). It also revived Lange’s Constance Langdon, the grand dame of the infamous Hollywood murder mansion. Basically, at this point, any character who wasn’t already canonically a ghost at the end of the show’s first season is probably back on the table for a potential appearance in this presumed sequel series. 

    Set images from Murphy’s production company have confirmed that Paulson and Roberts are reprising their respective Coven characters, and while there’s no official word about whether Lange is returning as Constance, the set images that have been shared sure look a whole lot like it. (That is not a Fiona Goode hairdo, is what I’m saying.) Does this mean we won’t see Fiona again? Never say never — if Madison Montgomery can be sprung from her department store hell, there’s no reason to assume Fiona can’t be similarly freed from her eternal prison of knotty pine.

    Mallory has already been theoretically established as Cordelia’s successor and the next Supreme witch, so the question of what new danger or drama arises at New Orleans’s infamous Robichaux Academy is still up in the air.

    But we won’t have to wait that long to find out — Murphy has already confirmed the new season will arrive in September, just in time for spooky season. 

    The post American Horror Story Season 13 Is Shaping Up to Be a Timeline-Shifting Coven Follow-Up appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • 20 Movie Facts That Just Make Everything Better

    20 Movie Facts That Just Make Everything Better

    A clever improvisation, a happy accident, or a last-minute decision that somehow worked are moments that enhance what movies are trying to show. In many cases, these moments reveal just how unpredictable filmmaking can be, with some of the most memorable scenes coming together in unexpected ways.

    Instead of breaking the illusion, these details deepen the appreciation for the craft and the people behind it. These are the kinds of facts that don’t ruin the magic, they make it even better. After all, if the people making the movies we love are having fun, so are we.

    The post 20 Movie Facts That Just Make Everything Better appeared first on Den of Geek.

    As regular viewers of the FX anthology series already know, American Horror Story can be something of a mixed bag. Over the past 15 years, the series has tackled everything from serial killers and aliens to vampires, witches, ghosts, and famous true crime cases, with varying degrees of success. The show’s later seasons, in particular, have struggled to recapture the magic of the earlier outings, which saw its stars — most notably Oscar winner Jessica Lange — racking up awards season nominations and hardware. (In fact, if you haven’t seen them, you should probably just skip AHS: Delicate and AHS: Double Feature entirely.) 

    But the franchise certainly seems on an upswing again with its forthcoming 13th season, which will bring back many of the franchise’s most popular regular players, including Sarah Paulson, Kathy Bates, Angela Bassett, Evan Peters, Emma Roberts, Billie Lourd, Gabourey Sidibe and Leslie Grossman, while adding Arianna Grande (who starred in Murphy’s wildly underrated Scream Queens) to the mix.

    But, and perhaps most importantly for fans: Lange herself will be back this season, for the first time in a regular capacity since season 4’s Freak Show

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    Lange’s long-awaited return is probably already enough to get the most lapsed of AHS viewers to return to the fold. But now that it appears the show is going to return to the world of one of its most popular installments? Heck yeah, sign us up.

    Creator Ryan Murphy has been cagey about what sort of story this Avengers: Doomsday-level season is likely to tell. But thanks to the events of American Horror Story: Apocalypse, any Coven follow-up has plenty of options. The ending of Apocalypse essentially erased or rewrote many events across the anthology’s interconnected timeline. The witch Mallory (Lourd) was sent back into the past, where she killed Michael Langdon (Cody Fern), the Antichrist child born at the end of the series’ original installment, Murder House

    His death not only prevented the apocalypse of season 8’s title, but also resurrected many dearly departed Coven characters, including Paulson’s Supreme with Cordelia Foxx, and her fellow witches Misty Day (Lily Rabe), Zoe Benson (Taissa Farmiga), and Queenie (Sidibe). It also revived Lange’s Constance Langdon, the grand dame of the infamous Hollywood murder mansion. Basically, at this point, any character who wasn’t already canonically a ghost at the end of the show’s first season is probably back on the table for a potential appearance in this presumed sequel series. 

    Set images from Murphy’s production company have confirmed that Paulson and Roberts are reprising their respective Coven characters, and while there’s no official word about whether Lange is returning as Constance, the set images that have been shared sure look a whole lot like it. (That is not a Fiona Goode hairdo, is what I’m saying.) Does this mean we won’t see Fiona again? Never say never — if Madison Montgomery can be sprung from her department store hell, there’s no reason to assume Fiona can’t be similarly freed from her eternal prison of knotty pine.

    Mallory has already been theoretically established as Cordelia’s successor and the next Supreme witch, so the question of what new danger or drama arises at New Orleans’s infamous Robichaux Academy is still up in the air.

    But we won’t have to wait that long to find out — Murphy has already confirmed the new season will arrive in September, just in time for spooky season. 

    The post American Horror Story Season 13 Is Shaping Up to Be a Timeline-Shifting Coven Follow-Up appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • Monarch: Legacy of Monsters Stars Kurt and Wyatt Russell Break Down Their Time-Bending  Moment

    Monarch: Legacy of Monsters Stars Kurt and Wyatt Russell Break Down Their Time-Bending Moment

    The following contains spoilers for Monarch: Legacy of Monsters season 2 episode 7. Monarch: Legacy of Monsters has what is probably the best stunt casting on TV right now. This isn’t an insult, by the way. And not even entirely accurate; it’s actually more like a very human sort of special effect. The sci-fi series, […]

    The post Monarch: Legacy of Monsters Stars Kurt and Wyatt Russell Break Down Their Time-Bending Moment appeared first on Den of Geek.

    As regular viewers of the FX anthology series already know, American Horror Story can be something of a mixed bag. Over the past 15 years, the series has tackled everything from serial killers and aliens to vampires, witches, ghosts, and famous true crime cases, with varying degrees of success. The show’s later seasons, in particular, have struggled to recapture the magic of the earlier outings, which saw its stars — most notably Oscar winner Jessica Lange — racking up awards season nominations and hardware. (In fact, if you haven’t seen them, you should probably just skip AHS: Delicate and AHS: Double Feature entirely.) 

    But the franchise certainly seems on an upswing again with its forthcoming 13th season, which will bring back many of the franchise’s most popular regular players, including Sarah Paulson, Kathy Bates, Angela Bassett, Evan Peters, Emma Roberts, Billie Lourd, Gabourey Sidibe and Leslie Grossman, while adding Arianna Grande (who starred in Murphy’s wildly underrated Scream Queens) to the mix.

    But, and perhaps most importantly for fans: Lange herself will be back this season, for the first time in a regular capacity since season 4’s Freak Show

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    Lange’s long-awaited return is probably already enough to get the most lapsed of AHS viewers to return to the fold. But now that it appears the show is going to return to the world of one of its most popular installments? Heck yeah, sign us up.

    Creator Ryan Murphy has been cagey about what sort of story this Avengers: Doomsday-level season is likely to tell. But thanks to the events of American Horror Story: Apocalypse, any Coven follow-up has plenty of options. The ending of Apocalypse essentially erased or rewrote many events across the anthology’s interconnected timeline. The witch Mallory (Lourd) was sent back into the past, where she killed Michael Langdon (Cody Fern), the Antichrist child born at the end of the series’ original installment, Murder House

    His death not only prevented the apocalypse of season 8’s title, but also resurrected many dearly departed Coven characters, including Paulson’s Supreme with Cordelia Foxx, and her fellow witches Misty Day (Lily Rabe), Zoe Benson (Taissa Farmiga), and Queenie (Sidibe). It also revived Lange’s Constance Langdon, the grand dame of the infamous Hollywood murder mansion. Basically, at this point, any character who wasn’t already canonically a ghost at the end of the show’s first season is probably back on the table for a potential appearance in this presumed sequel series. 

    Set images from Murphy’s production company have confirmed that Paulson and Roberts are reprising their respective Coven characters, and while there’s no official word about whether Lange is returning as Constance, the set images that have been shared sure look a whole lot like it. (That is not a Fiona Goode hairdo, is what I’m saying.) Does this mean we won’t see Fiona again? Never say never — if Madison Montgomery can be sprung from her department store hell, there’s no reason to assume Fiona can’t be similarly freed from her eternal prison of knotty pine.

    Mallory has already been theoretically established as Cordelia’s successor and the next Supreme witch, so the question of what new danger or drama arises at New Orleans’s infamous Robichaux Academy is still up in the air.

    But we won’t have to wait that long to find out — Murphy has already confirmed the new season will arrive in September, just in time for spooky season. 

    The post American Horror Story Season 13 Is Shaping Up to Be a Timeline-Shifting Coven Follow-Up appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • Corbin Bernsen On Embracing a Roger Corman Spirit, Working With His Son in Woodstockers

    Corbin Bernsen On Embracing a Roger Corman Spirit, Working With His Son in Woodstockers

    To hear him tell it, Corbin Bernsen became an actor when his father, producer Harry Bernsen Jr., recruited him to be in the 1974 Blaxploitation flick Three the Hard Way, starring Jim Brown and Fred Williamson. “The script said, ‘A pair of naked young limbs, thrashing in the backseat of a Rolls Royce,’” Bernsen recalls […]

    The post Corbin Bernsen On Embracing a Roger Corman Spirit, Working With His Son in Woodstockers appeared first on Den of Geek.

    As regular viewers of the FX anthology series already know, American Horror Story can be something of a mixed bag. Over the past 15 years, the series has tackled everything from serial killers and aliens to vampires, witches, ghosts, and famous true crime cases, with varying degrees of success. The show’s later seasons, in particular, have struggled to recapture the magic of the earlier outings, which saw its stars — most notably Oscar winner Jessica Lange — racking up awards season nominations and hardware. (In fact, if you haven’t seen them, you should probably just skip AHS: Delicate and AHS: Double Feature entirely.) 

    But the franchise certainly seems on an upswing again with its forthcoming 13th season, which will bring back many of the franchise’s most popular regular players, including Sarah Paulson, Kathy Bates, Angela Bassett, Evan Peters, Emma Roberts, Billie Lourd, Gabourey Sidibe and Leslie Grossman, while adding Arianna Grande (who starred in Murphy’s wildly underrated Scream Queens) to the mix.

    But, and perhaps most importantly for fans: Lange herself will be back this season, for the first time in a regular capacity since season 4’s Freak Show

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    Lange’s long-awaited return is probably already enough to get the most lapsed of AHS viewers to return to the fold. But now that it appears the show is going to return to the world of one of its most popular installments? Heck yeah, sign us up.

    Creator Ryan Murphy has been cagey about what sort of story this Avengers: Doomsday-level season is likely to tell. But thanks to the events of American Horror Story: Apocalypse, any Coven follow-up has plenty of options. The ending of Apocalypse essentially erased or rewrote many events across the anthology’s interconnected timeline. The witch Mallory (Lourd) was sent back into the past, where she killed Michael Langdon (Cody Fern), the Antichrist child born at the end of the series’ original installment, Murder House

    His death not only prevented the apocalypse of season 8’s title, but also resurrected many dearly departed Coven characters, including Paulson’s Supreme with Cordelia Foxx, and her fellow witches Misty Day (Lily Rabe), Zoe Benson (Taissa Farmiga), and Queenie (Sidibe). It also revived Lange’s Constance Langdon, the grand dame of the infamous Hollywood murder mansion. Basically, at this point, any character who wasn’t already canonically a ghost at the end of the show’s first season is probably back on the table for a potential appearance in this presumed sequel series. 

    Set images from Murphy’s production company have confirmed that Paulson and Roberts are reprising their respective Coven characters, and while there’s no official word about whether Lange is returning as Constance, the set images that have been shared sure look a whole lot like it. (That is not a Fiona Goode hairdo, is what I’m saying.) Does this mean we won’t see Fiona again? Never say never — if Madison Montgomery can be sprung from her department store hell, there’s no reason to assume Fiona can’t be similarly freed from her eternal prison of knotty pine.

    Mallory has already been theoretically established as Cordelia’s successor and the next Supreme witch, so the question of what new danger or drama arises at New Orleans’s infamous Robichaux Academy is still up in the air.

    But we won’t have to wait that long to find out — Murphy has already confirmed the new season will arrive in September, just in time for spooky season. 

    The post American Horror Story Season 13 Is Shaping Up to Be a Timeline-Shifting Coven Follow-Up appeared first on Den of Geek.

  • Maitreyi Ramakrishnan Talks Never Have I Ever and Why We Need More Teen Dramas Today

    Maitreyi Ramakrishnan Talks Never Have I Ever and Why We Need More Teen Dramas Today

    Though actress Maitreyi Ramakrishnan’s latest role sees her playing a superhero that can talk to crows on The Boys, her breakthrough performance was as the lead of Netflix’s Never Have I Ever, a charming teen comedy that follows the coming-of-age journey of an Indian American girl in Los Angeles. Ramakrishnan played Devi Vishwakumar, an ambitious […]

    The post Maitreyi Ramakrishnan Talks Never Have I Ever and Why We Need More Teen Dramas Today appeared first on Den of Geek.

    As regular viewers of the FX anthology series already know, American Horror Story can be something of a mixed bag. Over the past 15 years, the series has tackled everything from serial killers and aliens to vampires, witches, ghosts, and famous true crime cases, with varying degrees of success. The show’s later seasons, in particular, have struggled to recapture the magic of the earlier outings, which saw its stars — most notably Oscar winner Jessica Lange — racking up awards season nominations and hardware. (In fact, if you haven’t seen them, you should probably just skip AHS: Delicate and AHS: Double Feature entirely.) 

    But the franchise certainly seems on an upswing again with its forthcoming 13th season, which will bring back many of the franchise’s most popular regular players, including Sarah Paulson, Kathy Bates, Angela Bassett, Evan Peters, Emma Roberts, Billie Lourd, Gabourey Sidibe and Leslie Grossman, while adding Arianna Grande (who starred in Murphy’s wildly underrated Scream Queens) to the mix.

    But, and perhaps most importantly for fans: Lange herself will be back this season, for the first time in a regular capacity since season 4’s Freak Show

    cnx.cmd.push(function() {
    cnx({
    playerId: “106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530”,

    }).render(“0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796”);
    });

    Lange’s long-awaited return is probably already enough to get the most lapsed of AHS viewers to return to the fold. But now that it appears the show is going to return to the world of one of its most popular installments? Heck yeah, sign us up.

    Creator Ryan Murphy has been cagey about what sort of story this Avengers: Doomsday-level season is likely to tell. But thanks to the events of American Horror Story: Apocalypse, any Coven follow-up has plenty of options. The ending of Apocalypse essentially erased or rewrote many events across the anthology’s interconnected timeline. The witch Mallory (Lourd) was sent back into the past, where she killed Michael Langdon (Cody Fern), the Antichrist child born at the end of the series’ original installment, Murder House

    His death not only prevented the apocalypse of season 8’s title, but also resurrected many dearly departed Coven characters, including Paulson’s Supreme with Cordelia Foxx, and her fellow witches Misty Day (Lily Rabe), Zoe Benson (Taissa Farmiga), and Queenie (Sidibe). It also revived Lange’s Constance Langdon, the grand dame of the infamous Hollywood murder mansion. Basically, at this point, any character who wasn’t already canonically a ghost at the end of the show’s first season is probably back on the table for a potential appearance in this presumed sequel series. 

    Set images from Murphy’s production company have confirmed that Paulson and Roberts are reprising their respective Coven characters, and while there’s no official word about whether Lange is returning as Constance, the set images that have been shared sure look a whole lot like it. (That is not a Fiona Goode hairdo, is what I’m saying.) Does this mean we won’t see Fiona again? Never say never — if Madison Montgomery can be sprung from her department store hell, there’s no reason to assume Fiona can’t be similarly freed from her eternal prison of knotty pine.

    Mallory has already been theoretically established as Cordelia’s successor and the next Supreme witch, so the question of what new danger or drama arises at New Orleans’s infamous Robichaux Academy is still up in the air.

    But we won’t have to wait that long to find out — Murphy has already confirmed the new season will arrive in September, just in time for spooky season. 

    The post American Horror Story Season 13 Is Shaping Up to Be a Timeline-Shifting Coven Follow-Up appeared first on Den of Geek.