Blog

I want to discuss accessibility because it is the most important thing for making websites. Other A List Apart articles give you innovation and insight. This article will give you homework. These are just my personal views, but they’re pretty good.

I want to start off with a couple of statements, and you will agree:

1. Designers are good people. I have never heard a designer say, “I don’t care if somebody can’t read this text”, “Not my fault if somebody can’t use this device”, or “Who cares if this is confusing?”
2. Some designs exclude people. You have seen people unable to read the text on a website or app that somebody designed. You’ve seen people unable to use a physical device that somebody has designed. You’ve seen people utterly bamboozled while trying to use a service that somebody designed.

So what?

The first question is, “Is this life-or-death stuff?” The answer is, “Yes.” In my favorite essay, This Is All There Is, Aral Balkan makes the point that pretty much everything that we design can affect life events and death events. Aral gives the example of how even a straightforward bus timetable app can affect life and death events, if we design it badly:

• somebody might miss a life event, such as their daughter’s fifth birthday party; or
• somebody might miss a death event, such as the chance to say goodbye to a dying grandmother.

The next—and frustrating—question is, “Why do some designs still exclude people?” After all, we know that:

• not everybody can see perfectly;
• not everybody can hear perfectly;
• not everybody thinks the same way; and
• not everybody moves the same way.

I think the answer is that there’s too much to recall. Consider, if you will, the wide variety of topics that A List Apart articles cover. Designers are expected to remember all of that guidance, plus all of the accessibility guidance, plus so much more. It is too much.

Recognizing accessibility issues while designing

I’d like to point toward one possible solution, starting from Jakob Nielsen’s 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design. These are from the mid-1990s, and—although there’s a good chance that you, gentle reader, are a lot younger than that—please bear with me. 

Seeing as the problem is that there’s too much to recall, I want to look at heuristic № 6, “Recognition rather than Recall.” Jakob Nielsen said that for users, information required to use the design should be visible or easily retrievable when needed. I suggest we tweak that to make life easier for designers. Let’s say that the information required to produce the design should be visible or easily retrievable when needed. In other words, let’s make it easier to recognise accessibility issues while we’re designing.

How are we going to do that? I really like the book A Web for Everyone—Designing Accessible User Experiences by Sarah Horton and Whitney Quesenbery. I really like this book not only because it includes a quote from me—actually two quotes, but I don’t like to boast—but because it includes personas that are perfect for helping us to recognise accessibility issues. That’s the good news. The even better news is that these personas are available now for free on the companion website to the book What Every Engineer Should Know About Digital Accessibility, again by Sarah Horton, with David Sloan this time.

Meet your users

I’m going to introduce you to these personas now:

• Vishnu, an engineer and global citizen with low vision says, “I want to be on the same level as everyone else”, “If I can adjust my screen, I can read comfortably”, and, “Translating in my head is easier with simpler sentences.”
• Trevor, a high school student with autism, says, “I like consistent, familiar places on the web”, “When I can learn the pattern, I can find my way”, and, “Reading is hard for me”.
• Steven, a deaf graphic artist and American Sign Language speaker, says, “My only disability is that everyone doesn’t sign”, and, “Without captions, it’s meaningless to me”.
• Maria, a bilingual community health worker, says, “I love this. It’s all here … when I can find it”, “When a site is confusing, I just leave”—fair enough, Maria!—and, “When I hear and see it, health information makes more sense”.
• Lea, an editor living with fatigue and pain, says, “No one gets that this really is a disability”, “Don’t make me work so hard”—please do not bombard this lady with drop-down lists—and, “Links at the top of the page make navigation easier for me”.
• Jacob, a blind paralegal and a bit of a geek, says, “The right technology lets me do anything”, and “This makes it possible to do my job”.
• Emily, who has cerebral palsy and is living independently, says, “I want to do everything for myself”, “Simpler screens are easier screens”—hell yeah, Emily!—and, “Tell me what I need in advance”.
• Carol, a grandmother with macular degeneration which affects her sight, says, “My grandkids are dragging me into the world of technology”, “I don’t understand what the screen is saying”, and, “Why can’t the text be just a little bit larger?”

I want to throw one more persona at you now, because, well, A List Apart readers are overachievers. One of my favorite authors, Cennydd Bowles—who literally wrote the book on Future Ethics—says to create Personas Non Grata. In other words, every time we design something, we have to think about what a bad guy could do with that thing, and whom that might affect.

To actually use these personas while designing, I like what Eric Meyer and Sara Wachter-Boettcher in Design for Real Life call the Designated Dissenter: for each project that you work on, one of your teams should be responsible for asking, “Will this work for Vishnu?”, “How’s Trevor going to get on with this?”, and so on. 

Then, once you’ve used the personas to recognise the accessibility issues, you can look up the guidelines for whichever platforms you’re designing for: 

• Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2
• Accessibility designing — Material Design 3
• Accessibility — Windows apps
• Accessibility | Apple Developer Documentation
• Check your interface for accessibility (Ubuntu)

Your mission, should you choose to accept it

I told you in the introduction of this article that I would give you homework. You thought I was joking. So, here’s your homework: I want you to grab the personas from the Know About Accessibility website, and use them throughout every design project to help you recognise accessibility issues while you work—and reclaim design for everyone.

NOTE: This article is based on “Recognise,” my five-minute presentation from Interaction Design Association (IxDA) Dublin’s Defuse (Design for Use) event in 2025.

Every language app in your pocket inherited a teaching method built for Latin. Understanding why that happened is a more useful design lesson than anything the apps themselves will teach you.

In 1788, Prussia introduced the Abitur, a standardized national examination required for entry into universities and the civil service. To pass it, students needed to demonstrate measurable, gradable knowledge. The system needed to teach language to large classrooms, produce consistent outcomes, and do it with one teacher and thirty students. The educators responsible for designing this system reached for the only teaching template they had, one that had been used in European schools for two centuries: the method developed to teach Latin.

Latin, by 1788, was a dead language. Nobody needed to speak it. The scholars who studied it were reading Cicero and Virgil, not conducting conversations. The method built around it, memorizing grammar rules, constructing translations, analyzing written texts, reflected that reality exactly. Oral skills were irrelevant. Comprehension of written form was everything. The method was not designed to produce speakers. It was designed to produce readers of texts in a language nobody spoke.

When Prussia applied this template to French and German, living languages spoken by living people, the premise did not change. Johann Valentin Meidinger’s textbook Praktische Französische Grammatik, published in 1804, ran to 37 editions across Europe by 1857. Karl Plotz formalized the approach into what became the dominant model for teaching modern languages across Europe and eventually the United States, where it became known simply as the Prussian Method [1]. Each institution that adopted it trained teachers in it, who trained students who became teachers. The constraint that created the method, how do you grade language at scale with limited resources, became invisible inside the method itself. What remained was the assumption: language is a body of rules to be learned consciously and measured. It was a design decision dressed up, over time, as a pedagogical truth.

The observation that should have ended it

There are people in the world who cannot read or write a language and speak it fluently. There are children who hold full conversations years before they can read a single word. There are immigrants who arrive in a country knowing nothing of its language and come out, years later, speaking it naturally, not because they studied it, but because they lived inside it. Literacy and fluency are separate things produced by entirely separate mechanisms. The Grammar-Translation method, as it became known, assumed they were the same thing. That assumption was inherited from a method designed for a language nobody needed to speak, and it was wrong the moment it was applied to a language people actually used.

The evidence against it accumulated slowly. In the mid to late nineteenth century, reformers including François Gouin in France and Maximilian Berlitz in the United States argued independently that language should be taught the way it is actually acquired, through immersive exposure to real communication in the target language, not through analysis of its rules. Berlitz built an entire school network around this principle. The reformers were correct. They were also largely ignored by mainstream education systems, because the Grammar-Translation method had one decisive advantage that direct immersion did not: it could be graded.

In 1982, the linguist Stephen Krashen gave the argument its most formal articulation in what he called the Monitor Model of second language acquisition. His distinction was precise: language acquisition, the unconscious process through which children absorb their native language and through which adults succeed in immersive environments, is categorically different from language learning, the conscious study of grammar rules and vocabulary that classrooms deliver [2]. Acquisition produces fluency. Learning, at best, produces the ability to pass a test. The evidence supporting this distinction, and the observation that immersive exposure to real native-speaker communication is the mechanism that produces genuine fluency, has only grown since.

I went to Brazil without a word of Portuguese and came out speaking it. I studied French in a classroom for years and cannot hold a conversation in French today. This is not an unusual experience. It is the expected outcome, and it has been the expected outcome for as long as we have had formal language education.

The same decision, made again in a different medium

Prussian educators faced the question: How do you deliver language learning at scale, measure progress, and retain users over time? The answer it arrived at was structurally identical to the one arrived at in 1788. Duolingo gamified the grammar drill into a streak. Anki formalized the translation exercise into a spaced-repetition flashcard. Babbel organized grammar lessons into structured modules. The interfaces were new. The underlying assumption, that language is a thing you study rather than an environment you inhabit, was not.

This was not a failure of design skill. The products that emerged from these decisions are, in many respects, genuinely well-crafted. Duolingo’s retention mechanics are sophisticated. Anki’s spaced repetition is grounded in real cognitive science. They are excellent at what they actually do. The problem is what they actually do: produce measurable engagement with a proxy for language rather than the conditions that produce language itself. A streak is measurable. A vocabulary score is measurable. The moment a user walks out of an app and holds a real conversation in another language, that happens in the world, outside the product, and cannot be instrumented.

When the outcome a user needs is difficult to measure directly, the design process tends to reach for something that can be measured. The proxy becomes the goal. The interface optimizes for it. The gap between what the product delivers and what the user actually needed grows. This is not a pattern unique to language learning. It is a pattern that repeats across product categories whenever a design constraint—the need to measure, the need to scale, the need to produce a grade—gets built into a system so deeply that it stops being visible as a constraint and starts being mistaken for a truth about the problem itself.

What happens when the constraint changes

The constraint that made the Grammar-Translation method necessary in 1788 was real and rational. One teacher. Thirty students. A standardized exam. You cannot grade a conversation at scale. You can grade a translation exercise. The method was not chosen because it produced fluency. It was chosen because it produced a score.

That constraint no longer exists in the same form. Technology has made it possible to deliver immersive, real-time conversation practice to anyone with a smartphone, at a cost that continues to fall. The design problem is no longer how to make language learning gradable at scale. It is how to make the conditions of genuine language acquisition accessible to people who cannot move to another country or afford a native-speaker tutor.

The products that are now closest to solving the actual problem are not the ones that invented a new pedagogy. They are the ones that removed the access barrier to an old one. Praktika builds AI conversation partners with distinct personalities, regional dialects, and cultural context, replicating the specificity of a real native speaker rather than a generic language-learning voice. Langua clones native speaker voices so that the interaction feels like a real conversation rather than a lesson. Rosetta Stone’s foundational methodology, image association in the target language with no translation, was built on the same insight Berlitz arrived at in the nineteenth century: language is acquired through immersive exposure, not through analysis of its rules [3]. A 2025 meta-analysis of 31 studies found that AI conversation tools produced a statistically significant improvement in language learning outcomes, a result that no amount of flashcard optimization has consistently matched [4].

None of these products invented a new theory of language acquisition. They translated an existing one into something more people could reach.

The design question this leaves

The Grammar-Translation method persisted not because educators were wrong about design, but because a design decision made under a specific constraint became, over two centuries, indistinguishable from the thing itself. The constraint, how do you grade language at scale, was forgotten. The method it produced was inherited as if it were a description of how language works, passed from Prussia to Europe to America to the App Store, from the grammar drill to the streak.

Every time a design team optimizes for a metric because the actual outcome is hard to measure, they are making a version of the same decision. It is often the right decision given real constraints. The question worth asking is whether the constraint that made it necessary still exists, or whether it has simply become invisible inside the system it originally produced.

Before reaching for what can be measured, it is worth asking what the user actually needs to do, and what stopped them from doing it before. Sometimes the answer is a new solution. More often it is an old one that was always out of reach.

Where AI Belongs in Your Business written by Jordan E read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Catch the Full Episode: Overview This one’s back from the vault. AI tools keep piling up, so the question John Jantsch and Ryan Levesque take on here matters more now than when it first aired. Where should AI save you time, and where does a personal touch let you charge more? Levesque runs AI every […]

Where AI Belongs in Your Business written by Jordan E read more at Duct Tape Marketing

Catch the Full Episode:

Overview

This one’s back from the vault. AI tools keep piling up, so the question John Jantsch and Ryan Levesque take on here matters more now than when it first aired. Where should AI save you time, and where does a personal touch let you charge more?

Levesque runs AI every day inside his own company. He explains how he decides what gets automated (the back office comes first) and what he won’t hand off. He and Jantsch also get into why work that doesn’t scale can set you apart and how letting customers see your process supports higher prices. Levesque also shares a 30-second morning habit that shapes the rest of his day.

Running a consultancy, an agency or a growing business? You’ll walk away with ideas you can test this week.

Guest Bio

Ryan Levesque has built and exited 2 companies with a combined value of more than $100 million, and he’s made the Inc. 5000 list 7 times as CEO. He wrote Ask, a No. 1 national bestseller and Inc.’s marketing book of the year, and he founded the ASK Method. His latest book is Return to Real: The Last Human Advantage in an Age of Artificial Everything. In it he argues that the things our bodies and spirits are hungry for are the same things customers will pay a premium for.

Key Takeaways

• Point AI at the back office first, the work that sits furthest from your customer. The email sequences and social posts that make your first impression need a human voice.
• Choose a few moments that won’t scale and handle them yourself. A voice memo to every new customer or a handwritten note to every new client shows a kind of care software can’t fake.
• Show your work. Let customers see how things get made and who makes them. The story behind the work is part of what they pay for.
• Make something before you scroll. Use the first minutes of your day, while your head is clear, to write or build before email and social media pull you in.
• Publish your own thinking on a schedule. For nearly 2.5 years Levesque has sent a weekly email, often 2,000 to 4,000 words long. He credits it with bringing in more opportunity than anything else he’s done in 20 years of business.

Great Moments

• [04:19] Having a website used to set a business apart. Now, Levesque says, people are surprised when they reach a live human on a customer service call.
• [05:27] Two photos of his sons taken 7 years apart, a $70 million deal that collapsed at the last minute, and a summer spent living in a tent on a Vermont farm.
• [09:45] His “touch earth before touching a screen” routine: walk outside barefoot, put your feet on bare ground and take one deep breath.
• [12:57] The morning he read an email sent under his name, hated it and slammed his laptop shut. That led to “The Embarrassing Confession” and his comparison of freshly squeezed orange juice to the canned kind.
• [16:39] A painting bought for about $10,000 sold for $450 million after it was attributed to Leonardo da Vinci. Levesque ties that story to Steinway’s documentary and to the time-lapse video he made of hand-illustrating his book.

Memorable Quotes

• What doesn’t scale for you also will not scale for your competitor. And therein lies the competitive advantage. Doing the things that your competitor will not be willing to do.” – Ryan Levesque
• “It’s not about being anti AI or being pro AI, it’s about finding the right places to put AI into your business.” – Ryan Levesque
• “What the world is craving is what I describe as the freshly squeezed version of orange juice that you get at Sunday brunch in a world where everybody else is serving the watered-down stuff that comes in a can.” – Ryan Levesque
• “When you combine those two simple practices, touch earth before you touch screen, and create before you consume, it’ll shift your day, which will shift your week, which will shift your month, which will shift your year.” – Ryan Levesque
• “For those of us who are knowledge workers, for those of us who spend time in front of a computer, we have to find an outlet that reconnects us to our body, that reconnects us to the analog, that reconnects us to the physical world.” – Ryan Levesque

Resources

• Return to Real: The Last Human Advantage in an Age of Artificial Everything (Book on Amazon) & (Direct Website)
• Ryan Levesque on LinkedIn

Sometimes knowing a little behind-the-scenes information completely changes the way you watch a movie. A seemingly ordinary scene might hide a clever detail, an actor might have improvised a moment that made it into the final cut, or a tiny background element could reveal something you completely missed the first time. Filmmakers love hiding little surprises for attentive viewers, and some of the most interesting details only become obvious once you know what to look for. These movie facts are particularly fun because they give familiar scenes a new meaning and might make you want to revisit the films immediately.

The post 15 Fun Movie Facts That Could Make a Film Worth a Rewatch appeared first on Den of Geek.

When you watch a film, you’re not just in it to experience the ending. After all, you could just look up how it ends online, if that’s all that you cared about. The reality is that a movie is an experience where every part of the story is meant to be significant, that means not just the end, but the beginning and the middle as well.

The selection we’ve brought for you today is made up of movies that nail that beginning and middle parts, only to fumble the endings. They’re still worthwhile experiences to go through, even if their endings leave a lot to be desired.

Sunshine

This gripping sci-fi thriller about a crew trying to reignite the Sun falls apart in the final act. It suddenly shifts from a thoughtful space drama into a completely different, slasher-style movie that ruins the earlier tension.

Signs

This is a M. Night Shyamalan thriller that built masterclass tension only to stumble at the finish line. The famously silly twist revealing the invading aliens are incredibly weak to water left a bad taste for many viewers.

Now You See Me

This heist movie features a widely criticized twist revealing FBI agent Dylan Rhodes as the mastermind. The unforeshadowed ending was deemed profoundly insulting and mind-bogglingly stupid, ruining the fun illusion of the entire film.

Lucy

The setup of a woman unlocking the full capacity of her brain is highly entertaining. The finale, though, becomes far too abstract, leaving behind the grounded action elements for a bizarre conclusion that lacks clear resolution.

Law Abiding Citizen

This vigilante action thriller directed by F. Gary Gray built a fascinating moral conflict. Then, the final outcome completely contradicts the tension developed earlier, simplifying a complex story into a very conventional and disappointing resolution.

Wonder Woman

The first DC Comics feature for this iconic superheroine was widely praised for its emotional weight. Unfortunately, the final battle devolves into a generic, CGI-heavy brawl that completely undercuts the thoughtful anti-war themes established earlier.

Knowing

This atmospheric thriller built genuine dread as a catastrophic event approached. Ultimately, the film received mixed-to-negative reviews, with major criticism directed toward heavy-handed implausibilities and a polarizing conclusion that felt like it belonged in a different movie.

The Abyss

James Cameron’s 1989 science fiction adventure offers breathtaking underwater visuals and intense isolation. Sadly, the theatrical cut wraps things up with a rushed, overly preachy alien encounter that deflates the incredible human drama that preceded it.

Source Code

This tight, inventive thriller about reliving the same few minutes on a train had a perfect, bittersweet stopping point. Instead, it pushes past that moment into a confusingly happy resolution that breaks its own established time-travel rules.

10 Cloverfield Lane

This 2016 science fiction thriller directed by Dan Trachtenberg is a masterclass in claustrophobic psychological tension. Then, the protagonist escapes the bunker only to suddenly find herself in a ridiculous, over-the-top action battle against literal alien ships.

Downsizing

This science fiction comedy-drama directed by Alexander Payne had a clever premise about shrinking humans to save money. Unfortunately, the narrative abandons its fun concept entirely in the final act for a heavy-handed environmental message.

Glass

The conclusion to this grounded superhero trilogy resolves major character arcs incredibly quickly and with minimal emotional impact. It reduces the weight of a story that took nearly two decades to build, leaving fans feeling completely empty.

The Devil Inside

The ending of this horror movie was singled out for mockery upon release. It literally cut to black and told viewers to visit a website for more information, prompting articles discussing whether it is cinema’s worst ending.

Savages

This action thriller directed by Oliver Stone builds to a violent and tragic climax, only to pull a massive fake-out. The story abruptly rewinds itself, offering a much safer and less satisfying resolution instead.

Identity

A clever whodunit structure keeps this thriller engaging for most of its runtime. However, the final explanation relies on a psychological twist that erases the stakes entirely, making the previous hour of murder mystery feel totally pointless.

Baby Driver

Edgar Wright’s action film about a getaway driver is a stylish, music-driven thrill ride. The final moments, however, abandon the kinetic energy for a drawn-out, highly conventional courtroom wrap-up that drags down the film’s incredible momentum.

The Wolverine

This standalone superhero film offered a fantastic, grounded look at a beloved mutant dealing with mortality in Japan. Sadly, the introspective journey concludes with a cartoonish battle against a giant robot suit, ruining the serious tone completely.

The Forgotten

This psychological thriller starts as a gripping mystery about a grieving mother whose memories are being erased. The fascinating setup is entirely ruined when the culprit is revealed to be a ridiculously absurd alien experiment with zero foreshadowing.

The post 18 Movies Where We Might as Well Just Ignore the Ending appeared first on Den of Geek.

Movie sets aren’t always as glamorous as they look on screen. Between demanding stunts, complicated choreography, heavy props, and physically exhausting scenes, accidents can happen even when everyone is doing their best to stay safe. Some actors have walked away with broken bones, others needed surgery, and a few accidentally turned their real injuries into some of the most memorable moments in their movies. What’s particularly surprising is how many of these incidents actually made it into the finished film. These stories prove that sometimes the pain behind a performance is very real.

The post 15 Times an Actor Hurt Themselves On Set appeared first on Den of Geek.

When you watch a film, you’re not just in it to experience the ending. After all, you could just look up how it ends online, if that’s all that you cared about. The reality is that a movie is an experience where every part of the story is meant to be significant, that means not just the end, but the beginning and the middle as well.

The selection we’ve brought for you today is made up of movies that nail that beginning and middle parts, only to fumble the endings. They’re still worthwhile experiences to go through, even if their endings leave a lot to be desired.

Sunshine

This gripping sci-fi thriller about a crew trying to reignite the Sun falls apart in the final act. It suddenly shifts from a thoughtful space drama into a completely different, slasher-style movie that ruins the earlier tension.

Signs

This is a M. Night Shyamalan thriller that built masterclass tension only to stumble at the finish line. The famously silly twist revealing the invading aliens are incredibly weak to water left a bad taste for many viewers.

Now You See Me

This heist movie features a widely criticized twist revealing FBI agent Dylan Rhodes as the mastermind. The unforeshadowed ending was deemed profoundly insulting and mind-bogglingly stupid, ruining the fun illusion of the entire film.

Lucy

The setup of a woman unlocking the full capacity of her brain is highly entertaining. The finale, though, becomes far too abstract, leaving behind the grounded action elements for a bizarre conclusion that lacks clear resolution.

Law Abiding Citizen

This vigilante action thriller directed by F. Gary Gray built a fascinating moral conflict. Then, the final outcome completely contradicts the tension developed earlier, simplifying a complex story into a very conventional and disappointing resolution.

Wonder Woman

The first DC Comics feature for this iconic superheroine was widely praised for its emotional weight. Unfortunately, the final battle devolves into a generic, CGI-heavy brawl that completely undercuts the thoughtful anti-war themes established earlier.

Knowing

This atmospheric thriller built genuine dread as a catastrophic event approached. Ultimately, the film received mixed-to-negative reviews, with major criticism directed toward heavy-handed implausibilities and a polarizing conclusion that felt like it belonged in a different movie.

The Abyss

James Cameron’s 1989 science fiction adventure offers breathtaking underwater visuals and intense isolation. Sadly, the theatrical cut wraps things up with a rushed, overly preachy alien encounter that deflates the incredible human drama that preceded it.

Source Code

This tight, inventive thriller about reliving the same few minutes on a train had a perfect, bittersweet stopping point. Instead, it pushes past that moment into a confusingly happy resolution that breaks its own established time-travel rules.

10 Cloverfield Lane

This 2016 science fiction thriller directed by Dan Trachtenberg is a masterclass in claustrophobic psychological tension. Then, the protagonist escapes the bunker only to suddenly find herself in a ridiculous, over-the-top action battle against literal alien ships.

Downsizing

This science fiction comedy-drama directed by Alexander Payne had a clever premise about shrinking humans to save money. Unfortunately, the narrative abandons its fun concept entirely in the final act for a heavy-handed environmental message.

Glass

The conclusion to this grounded superhero trilogy resolves major character arcs incredibly quickly and with minimal emotional impact. It reduces the weight of a story that took nearly two decades to build, leaving fans feeling completely empty.

The Devil Inside

The ending of this horror movie was singled out for mockery upon release. It literally cut to black and told viewers to visit a website for more information, prompting articles discussing whether it is cinema’s worst ending.

Savages

This action thriller directed by Oliver Stone builds to a violent and tragic climax, only to pull a massive fake-out. The story abruptly rewinds itself, offering a much safer and less satisfying resolution instead.

Identity

A clever whodunit structure keeps this thriller engaging for most of its runtime. However, the final explanation relies on a psychological twist that erases the stakes entirely, making the previous hour of murder mystery feel totally pointless.

Baby Driver

Edgar Wright’s action film about a getaway driver is a stylish, music-driven thrill ride. The final moments, however, abandon the kinetic energy for a drawn-out, highly conventional courtroom wrap-up that drags down the film’s incredible momentum.

The Wolverine

This standalone superhero film offered a fantastic, grounded look at a beloved mutant dealing with mortality in Japan. Sadly, the introspective journey concludes with a cartoonish battle against a giant robot suit, ruining the serious tone completely.

The Forgotten

This psychological thriller starts as a gripping mystery about a grieving mother whose memories are being erased. The fascinating setup is entirely ruined when the culprit is revealed to be a ridiculously absurd alien experiment with zero foreshadowing.

The post 18 Movies Where We Might as Well Just Ignore the Ending appeared first on Den of Geek.

Growing up in the 1990s meant accepting things that would probably confuse anyone born in the smartphone era. Getting directions from a printed map, waiting several days for photos to be developed, and calling someone’s house without knowing who might answer were all perfectly ordinary experiences. Technology was changing quickly, but everyday life still involved plenty of little inconveniences that nobody thought twice about. Some habits were genuinely fun, others were downright ridiculous, and a few would probably cause serious complaints if they suddenly came back. Looking back, it’s amazing how much of ordinary life has changed.

The post 15 Things That Were Normal in the 1990s But Would Seem Strange Today appeared first on Den of Geek.

When you watch a film, you’re not just in it to experience the ending. After all, you could just look up how it ends online, if that’s all that you cared about. The reality is that a movie is an experience where every part of the story is meant to be significant, that means not just the end, but the beginning and the middle as well.

The selection we’ve brought for you today is made up of movies that nail that beginning and middle parts, only to fumble the endings. They’re still worthwhile experiences to go through, even if their endings leave a lot to be desired.

Sunshine

This gripping sci-fi thriller about a crew trying to reignite the Sun falls apart in the final act. It suddenly shifts from a thoughtful space drama into a completely different, slasher-style movie that ruins the earlier tension.

Signs

This is a M. Night Shyamalan thriller that built masterclass tension only to stumble at the finish line. The famously silly twist revealing the invading aliens are incredibly weak to water left a bad taste for many viewers.

Now You See Me

This heist movie features a widely criticized twist revealing FBI agent Dylan Rhodes as the mastermind. The unforeshadowed ending was deemed profoundly insulting and mind-bogglingly stupid, ruining the fun illusion of the entire film.

Lucy

The setup of a woman unlocking the full capacity of her brain is highly entertaining. The finale, though, becomes far too abstract, leaving behind the grounded action elements for a bizarre conclusion that lacks clear resolution.

Law Abiding Citizen

This vigilante action thriller directed by F. Gary Gray built a fascinating moral conflict. Then, the final outcome completely contradicts the tension developed earlier, simplifying a complex story into a very conventional and disappointing resolution.

Wonder Woman

The first DC Comics feature for this iconic superheroine was widely praised for its emotional weight. Unfortunately, the final battle devolves into a generic, CGI-heavy brawl that completely undercuts the thoughtful anti-war themes established earlier.

Knowing

This atmospheric thriller built genuine dread as a catastrophic event approached. Ultimately, the film received mixed-to-negative reviews, with major criticism directed toward heavy-handed implausibilities and a polarizing conclusion that felt like it belonged in a different movie.

The Abyss

James Cameron’s 1989 science fiction adventure offers breathtaking underwater visuals and intense isolation. Sadly, the theatrical cut wraps things up with a rushed, overly preachy alien encounter that deflates the incredible human drama that preceded it.

Source Code

This tight, inventive thriller about reliving the same few minutes on a train had a perfect, bittersweet stopping point. Instead, it pushes past that moment into a confusingly happy resolution that breaks its own established time-travel rules.

10 Cloverfield Lane

This 2016 science fiction thriller directed by Dan Trachtenberg is a masterclass in claustrophobic psychological tension. Then, the protagonist escapes the bunker only to suddenly find herself in a ridiculous, over-the-top action battle against literal alien ships.

Downsizing

This science fiction comedy-drama directed by Alexander Payne had a clever premise about shrinking humans to save money. Unfortunately, the narrative abandons its fun concept entirely in the final act for a heavy-handed environmental message.

Glass

The conclusion to this grounded superhero trilogy resolves major character arcs incredibly quickly and with minimal emotional impact. It reduces the weight of a story that took nearly two decades to build, leaving fans feeling completely empty.

The Devil Inside

The ending of this horror movie was singled out for mockery upon release. It literally cut to black and told viewers to visit a website for more information, prompting articles discussing whether it is cinema’s worst ending.

Savages

This action thriller directed by Oliver Stone builds to a violent and tragic climax, only to pull a massive fake-out. The story abruptly rewinds itself, offering a much safer and less satisfying resolution instead.

Identity

A clever whodunit structure keeps this thriller engaging for most of its runtime. However, the final explanation relies on a psychological twist that erases the stakes entirely, making the previous hour of murder mystery feel totally pointless.

Baby Driver

Edgar Wright’s action film about a getaway driver is a stylish, music-driven thrill ride. The final moments, however, abandon the kinetic energy for a drawn-out, highly conventional courtroom wrap-up that drags down the film’s incredible momentum.

The Wolverine

This standalone superhero film offered a fantastic, grounded look at a beloved mutant dealing with mortality in Japan. Sadly, the introspective journey concludes with a cartoonish battle against a giant robot suit, ruining the serious tone completely.

The Forgotten

This psychological thriller starts as a gripping mystery about a grieving mother whose memories are being erased. The fascinating setup is entirely ruined when the culprit is revealed to be a ridiculously absurd alien experiment with zero foreshadowing.

The post 18 Movies Where We Might as Well Just Ignore the Ending appeared first on Den of Geek.

Sometimes a company makes the changes customers have been demanding for years, only to discover that its reputation hasn’t caught up. Old complaints stick around, online jokes keep circulating, and people continue avoiding products that may have improved considerably. Nissan has spent years refining its CVT transmissions, while Hyundai and Kia have introduced anti-theft measures after their cars became infamous targets. Those stories raise an interesting question: how many brands are still paying for problems they’ve already addressed? Some fixes are well documented, others remain imperfect, but the gap between a company’s progress and public perception can be surprisingly difficult to close.

The post 15 Companies That Fixed Their Biggest Issue, But Nobody Cares appeared first on Den of Geek.

When you watch a film, you’re not just in it to experience the ending. After all, you could just look up how it ends online, if that’s all that you cared about. The reality is that a movie is an experience where every part of the story is meant to be significant, that means not just the end, but the beginning and the middle as well.

The selection we’ve brought for you today is made up of movies that nail that beginning and middle parts, only to fumble the endings. They’re still worthwhile experiences to go through, even if their endings leave a lot to be desired.

Sunshine

This gripping sci-fi thriller about a crew trying to reignite the Sun falls apart in the final act. It suddenly shifts from a thoughtful space drama into a completely different, slasher-style movie that ruins the earlier tension.

Signs

This is a M. Night Shyamalan thriller that built masterclass tension only to stumble at the finish line. The famously silly twist revealing the invading aliens are incredibly weak to water left a bad taste for many viewers.

Now You See Me

This heist movie features a widely criticized twist revealing FBI agent Dylan Rhodes as the mastermind. The unforeshadowed ending was deemed profoundly insulting and mind-bogglingly stupid, ruining the fun illusion of the entire film.

Lucy

The setup of a woman unlocking the full capacity of her brain is highly entertaining. The finale, though, becomes far too abstract, leaving behind the grounded action elements for a bizarre conclusion that lacks clear resolution.

Law Abiding Citizen

This vigilante action thriller directed by F. Gary Gray built a fascinating moral conflict. Then, the final outcome completely contradicts the tension developed earlier, simplifying a complex story into a very conventional and disappointing resolution.

Wonder Woman

The first DC Comics feature for this iconic superheroine was widely praised for its emotional weight. Unfortunately, the final battle devolves into a generic, CGI-heavy brawl that completely undercuts the thoughtful anti-war themes established earlier.

Knowing

This atmospheric thriller built genuine dread as a catastrophic event approached. Ultimately, the film received mixed-to-negative reviews, with major criticism directed toward heavy-handed implausibilities and a polarizing conclusion that felt like it belonged in a different movie.

The Abyss

James Cameron’s 1989 science fiction adventure offers breathtaking underwater visuals and intense isolation. Sadly, the theatrical cut wraps things up with a rushed, overly preachy alien encounter that deflates the incredible human drama that preceded it.

Source Code

This tight, inventive thriller about reliving the same few minutes on a train had a perfect, bittersweet stopping point. Instead, it pushes past that moment into a confusingly happy resolution that breaks its own established time-travel rules.

10 Cloverfield Lane

This 2016 science fiction thriller directed by Dan Trachtenberg is a masterclass in claustrophobic psychological tension. Then, the protagonist escapes the bunker only to suddenly find herself in a ridiculous, over-the-top action battle against literal alien ships.

Downsizing

This science fiction comedy-drama directed by Alexander Payne had a clever premise about shrinking humans to save money. Unfortunately, the narrative abandons its fun concept entirely in the final act for a heavy-handed environmental message.

Glass

The conclusion to this grounded superhero trilogy resolves major character arcs incredibly quickly and with minimal emotional impact. It reduces the weight of a story that took nearly two decades to build, leaving fans feeling completely empty.

The Devil Inside

The ending of this horror movie was singled out for mockery upon release. It literally cut to black and told viewers to visit a website for more information, prompting articles discussing whether it is cinema’s worst ending.

Savages

This action thriller directed by Oliver Stone builds to a violent and tragic climax, only to pull a massive fake-out. The story abruptly rewinds itself, offering a much safer and less satisfying resolution instead.

Identity

A clever whodunit structure keeps this thriller engaging for most of its runtime. However, the final explanation relies on a psychological twist that erases the stakes entirely, making the previous hour of murder mystery feel totally pointless.

Baby Driver

Edgar Wright’s action film about a getaway driver is a stylish, music-driven thrill ride. The final moments, however, abandon the kinetic energy for a drawn-out, highly conventional courtroom wrap-up that drags down the film’s incredible momentum.

The Wolverine

This standalone superhero film offered a fantastic, grounded look at a beloved mutant dealing with mortality in Japan. Sadly, the introspective journey concludes with a cartoonish battle against a giant robot suit, ruining the serious tone completely.

The Forgotten

This psychological thriller starts as a gripping mystery about a grieving mother whose memories are being erased. The fascinating setup is entirely ruined when the culprit is revealed to be a ridiculously absurd alien experiment with zero foreshadowing.

The post 18 Movies Where We Might as Well Just Ignore the Ending appeared first on Den of Geek.

Looking young is something plenty of people seem to figure out without making a big deal about it. Some swear by simple skincare habits, others credit their lifestyle, and a few have surprisingly unexpected explanations for why people think they’re younger than they really are. The interesting part is that many of these habits don’t involve expensive treatments or complicated routines. Sometimes it’s about consistency, getting enough sleep, or making small changes that actually stick. People have shared the little things they do to keep looking fresh, and some of their answers are genuinely worth trying.

The post 15 People Share Their Biggest Secrets to Looking Young appeared first on Den of Geek.

When you watch a film, you’re not just in it to experience the ending. After all, you could just look up how it ends online, if that’s all that you cared about. The reality is that a movie is an experience where every part of the story is meant to be significant, that means not just the end, but the beginning and the middle as well.

The selection we’ve brought for you today is made up of movies that nail that beginning and middle parts, only to fumble the endings. They’re still worthwhile experiences to go through, even if their endings leave a lot to be desired.

Sunshine

This gripping sci-fi thriller about a crew trying to reignite the Sun falls apart in the final act. It suddenly shifts from a thoughtful space drama into a completely different, slasher-style movie that ruins the earlier tension.

Signs

This is a M. Night Shyamalan thriller that built masterclass tension only to stumble at the finish line. The famously silly twist revealing the invading aliens are incredibly weak to water left a bad taste for many viewers.

Now You See Me

This heist movie features a widely criticized twist revealing FBI agent Dylan Rhodes as the mastermind. The unforeshadowed ending was deemed profoundly insulting and mind-bogglingly stupid, ruining the fun illusion of the entire film.

Lucy

The setup of a woman unlocking the full capacity of her brain is highly entertaining. The finale, though, becomes far too abstract, leaving behind the grounded action elements for a bizarre conclusion that lacks clear resolution.

Law Abiding Citizen

This vigilante action thriller directed by F. Gary Gray built a fascinating moral conflict. Then, the final outcome completely contradicts the tension developed earlier, simplifying a complex story into a very conventional and disappointing resolution.

Wonder Woman

The first DC Comics feature for this iconic superheroine was widely praised for its emotional weight. Unfortunately, the final battle devolves into a generic, CGI-heavy brawl that completely undercuts the thoughtful anti-war themes established earlier.

Knowing

This atmospheric thriller built genuine dread as a catastrophic event approached. Ultimately, the film received mixed-to-negative reviews, with major criticism directed toward heavy-handed implausibilities and a polarizing conclusion that felt like it belonged in a different movie.

The Abyss

James Cameron’s 1989 science fiction adventure offers breathtaking underwater visuals and intense isolation. Sadly, the theatrical cut wraps things up with a rushed, overly preachy alien encounter that deflates the incredible human drama that preceded it.

Source Code

This tight, inventive thriller about reliving the same few minutes on a train had a perfect, bittersweet stopping point. Instead, it pushes past that moment into a confusingly happy resolution that breaks its own established time-travel rules.

10 Cloverfield Lane

This 2016 science fiction thriller directed by Dan Trachtenberg is a masterclass in claustrophobic psychological tension. Then, the protagonist escapes the bunker only to suddenly find herself in a ridiculous, over-the-top action battle against literal alien ships.

Downsizing

This science fiction comedy-drama directed by Alexander Payne had a clever premise about shrinking humans to save money. Unfortunately, the narrative abandons its fun concept entirely in the final act for a heavy-handed environmental message.

Glass

The conclusion to this grounded superhero trilogy resolves major character arcs incredibly quickly and with minimal emotional impact. It reduces the weight of a story that took nearly two decades to build, leaving fans feeling completely empty.

The Devil Inside

The ending of this horror movie was singled out for mockery upon release. It literally cut to black and told viewers to visit a website for more information, prompting articles discussing whether it is cinema’s worst ending.

Savages

This action thriller directed by Oliver Stone builds to a violent and tragic climax, only to pull a massive fake-out. The story abruptly rewinds itself, offering a much safer and less satisfying resolution instead.

Identity

A clever whodunit structure keeps this thriller engaging for most of its runtime. However, the final explanation relies on a psychological twist that erases the stakes entirely, making the previous hour of murder mystery feel totally pointless.

Baby Driver

Edgar Wright’s action film about a getaway driver is a stylish, music-driven thrill ride. The final moments, however, abandon the kinetic energy for a drawn-out, highly conventional courtroom wrap-up that drags down the film’s incredible momentum.

The Wolverine

This standalone superhero film offered a fantastic, grounded look at a beloved mutant dealing with mortality in Japan. Sadly, the introspective journey concludes with a cartoonish battle against a giant robot suit, ruining the serious tone completely.

The Forgotten

This psychological thriller starts as a gripping mystery about a grieving mother whose memories are being erased. The fascinating setup is entirely ruined when the culprit is revealed to be a ridiculously absurd alien experiment with zero foreshadowing.

The post 18 Movies Where We Might as Well Just Ignore the Ending appeared first on Den of Geek.

Folk tales were the legends of old, giving rise to many mythological creatures that now plague popular media. Urban legends are a more modern take on that, having people explain the strange sounds of a city’s night time with ghosts, haunts, and other supernatural interpretations.

Well, the internet has its own version of this, the Creepypasta, called as such due to how it is copy-pasted to be shared, instead of it being an oral tale. These are the most memorable Creepypasta stories; none of them were meant to be taken seriously, but they manage to unsettle nonetheless.

The post The Biggest Creepypasta Stories From All Over The Internet appeared first on Den of Geek.

When you watch a film, you’re not just in it to experience the ending. After all, you could just look up how it ends online, if that’s all that you cared about. The reality is that a movie is an experience where every part of the story is meant to be significant, that means not just the end, but the beginning and the middle as well.

The selection we’ve brought for you today is made up of movies that nail that beginning and middle parts, only to fumble the endings. They’re still worthwhile experiences to go through, even if their endings leave a lot to be desired.

Sunshine

This gripping sci-fi thriller about a crew trying to reignite the Sun falls apart in the final act. It suddenly shifts from a thoughtful space drama into a completely different, slasher-style movie that ruins the earlier tension.

Signs

This is a M. Night Shyamalan thriller that built masterclass tension only to stumble at the finish line. The famously silly twist revealing the invading aliens are incredibly weak to water left a bad taste for many viewers.

Now You See Me

This heist movie features a widely criticized twist revealing FBI agent Dylan Rhodes as the mastermind. The unforeshadowed ending was deemed profoundly insulting and mind-bogglingly stupid, ruining the fun illusion of the entire film.

Lucy

The setup of a woman unlocking the full capacity of her brain is highly entertaining. The finale, though, becomes far too abstract, leaving behind the grounded action elements for a bizarre conclusion that lacks clear resolution.

Law Abiding Citizen

This vigilante action thriller directed by F. Gary Gray built a fascinating moral conflict. Then, the final outcome completely contradicts the tension developed earlier, simplifying a complex story into a very conventional and disappointing resolution.

Wonder Woman

The first DC Comics feature for this iconic superheroine was widely praised for its emotional weight. Unfortunately, the final battle devolves into a generic, CGI-heavy brawl that completely undercuts the thoughtful anti-war themes established earlier.

Knowing

This atmospheric thriller built genuine dread as a catastrophic event approached. Ultimately, the film received mixed-to-negative reviews, with major criticism directed toward heavy-handed implausibilities and a polarizing conclusion that felt like it belonged in a different movie.

The Abyss

James Cameron’s 1989 science fiction adventure offers breathtaking underwater visuals and intense isolation. Sadly, the theatrical cut wraps things up with a rushed, overly preachy alien encounter that deflates the incredible human drama that preceded it.

Source Code

This tight, inventive thriller about reliving the same few minutes on a train had a perfect, bittersweet stopping point. Instead, it pushes past that moment into a confusingly happy resolution that breaks its own established time-travel rules.

10 Cloverfield Lane

This 2016 science fiction thriller directed by Dan Trachtenberg is a masterclass in claustrophobic psychological tension. Then, the protagonist escapes the bunker only to suddenly find herself in a ridiculous, over-the-top action battle against literal alien ships.

Downsizing

This science fiction comedy-drama directed by Alexander Payne had a clever premise about shrinking humans to save money. Unfortunately, the narrative abandons its fun concept entirely in the final act for a heavy-handed environmental message.

Glass

The conclusion to this grounded superhero trilogy resolves major character arcs incredibly quickly and with minimal emotional impact. It reduces the weight of a story that took nearly two decades to build, leaving fans feeling completely empty.

The Devil Inside

The ending of this horror movie was singled out for mockery upon release. It literally cut to black and told viewers to visit a website for more information, prompting articles discussing whether it is cinema’s worst ending.

Savages

This action thriller directed by Oliver Stone builds to a violent and tragic climax, only to pull a massive fake-out. The story abruptly rewinds itself, offering a much safer and less satisfying resolution instead.

Identity

A clever whodunit structure keeps this thriller engaging for most of its runtime. However, the final explanation relies on a psychological twist that erases the stakes entirely, making the previous hour of murder mystery feel totally pointless.

Baby Driver

Edgar Wright’s action film about a getaway driver is a stylish, music-driven thrill ride. The final moments, however, abandon the kinetic energy for a drawn-out, highly conventional courtroom wrap-up that drags down the film’s incredible momentum.

The Wolverine

This standalone superhero film offered a fantastic, grounded look at a beloved mutant dealing with mortality in Japan. Sadly, the introspective journey concludes with a cartoonish battle against a giant robot suit, ruining the serious tone completely.

The Forgotten

This psychological thriller starts as a gripping mystery about a grieving mother whose memories are being erased. The fascinating setup is entirely ruined when the culprit is revealed to be a ridiculously absurd alien experiment with zero foreshadowing.

The post 18 Movies Where We Might as Well Just Ignore the Ending appeared first on Den of Geek.

When you watch a film, you’re not just in it to experience the ending. After all, you could just look up how it ends online, if that’s all that you cared about. The reality is that a movie is an experience where every part of the story is meant to be significant, that means not just the end, but the beginning and the middle as well.

The selection we’ve brought for you today is made up of movies that nail that beginning and middle parts, only to fumble the endings. They’re still worthwhile experiences to go through, even if their endings leave a lot to be desired.

The post 18 Movies Where We Might as Well Just Ignore the Ending appeared first on Den of Geek.

When you watch a film, you’re not just in it to experience the ending. After all, you could just look up how it ends online, if that’s all that you cared about. The reality is that a movie is an experience where every part of the story is meant to be significant, that means not just the end, but the beginning and the middle as well.

The selection we’ve brought for you today is made up of movies that nail that beginning and middle parts, only to fumble the endings. They’re still worthwhile experiences to go through, even if their endings leave a lot to be desired.

Sunshine

This gripping sci-fi thriller about a crew trying to reignite the Sun falls apart in the final act. It suddenly shifts from a thoughtful space drama into a completely different, slasher-style movie that ruins the earlier tension.

Signs

This is a M. Night Shyamalan thriller that built masterclass tension only to stumble at the finish line. The famously silly twist revealing the invading aliens are incredibly weak to water left a bad taste for many viewers.

Now You See Me

This heist movie features a widely criticized twist revealing FBI agent Dylan Rhodes as the mastermind. The unforeshadowed ending was deemed profoundly insulting and mind-bogglingly stupid, ruining the fun illusion of the entire film.

Lucy

The setup of a woman unlocking the full capacity of her brain is highly entertaining. The finale, though, becomes far too abstract, leaving behind the grounded action elements for a bizarre conclusion that lacks clear resolution.

Law Abiding Citizen

This vigilante action thriller directed by F. Gary Gray built a fascinating moral conflict. Then, the final outcome completely contradicts the tension developed earlier, simplifying a complex story into a very conventional and disappointing resolution.

Wonder Woman

The first DC Comics feature for this iconic superheroine was widely praised for its emotional weight. Unfortunately, the final battle devolves into a generic, CGI-heavy brawl that completely undercuts the thoughtful anti-war themes established earlier.

Knowing

This atmospheric thriller built genuine dread as a catastrophic event approached. Ultimately, the film received mixed-to-negative reviews, with major criticism directed toward heavy-handed implausibilities and a polarizing conclusion that felt like it belonged in a different movie.

The Abyss

James Cameron’s 1989 science fiction adventure offers breathtaking underwater visuals and intense isolation. Sadly, the theatrical cut wraps things up with a rushed, overly preachy alien encounter that deflates the incredible human drama that preceded it.

Source Code

This tight, inventive thriller about reliving the same few minutes on a train had a perfect, bittersweet stopping point. Instead, it pushes past that moment into a confusingly happy resolution that breaks its own established time-travel rules.

10 Cloverfield Lane

This 2016 science fiction thriller directed by Dan Trachtenberg is a masterclass in claustrophobic psychological tension. Then, the protagonist escapes the bunker only to suddenly find herself in a ridiculous, over-the-top action battle against literal alien ships.

Downsizing

This science fiction comedy-drama directed by Alexander Payne had a clever premise about shrinking humans to save money. Unfortunately, the narrative abandons its fun concept entirely in the final act for a heavy-handed environmental message.

Glass

The conclusion to this grounded superhero trilogy resolves major character arcs incredibly quickly and with minimal emotional impact. It reduces the weight of a story that took nearly two decades to build, leaving fans feeling completely empty.

The Devil Inside

The ending of this horror movie was singled out for mockery upon release. It literally cut to black and told viewers to visit a website for more information, prompting articles discussing whether it is cinema’s worst ending.

Savages

This action thriller directed by Oliver Stone builds to a violent and tragic climax, only to pull a massive fake-out. The story abruptly rewinds itself, offering a much safer and less satisfying resolution instead.

Identity

A clever whodunit structure keeps this thriller engaging for most of its runtime. However, the final explanation relies on a psychological twist that erases the stakes entirely, making the previous hour of murder mystery feel totally pointless.

Baby Driver

Edgar Wright’s action film about a getaway driver is a stylish, music-driven thrill ride. The final moments, however, abandon the kinetic energy for a drawn-out, highly conventional courtroom wrap-up that drags down the film’s incredible momentum.

The Wolverine

This standalone superhero film offered a fantastic, grounded look at a beloved mutant dealing with mortality in Japan. Sadly, the introspective journey concludes with a cartoonish battle against a giant robot suit, ruining the serious tone completely.

The Forgotten

This psychological thriller starts as a gripping mystery about a grieving mother whose memories are being erased. The fascinating setup is entirely ruined when the culprit is revealed to be a ridiculously absurd alien experiment with zero foreshadowing.

The post 18 Movies Where We Might as Well Just Ignore the Ending appeared first on Den of Geek.