Blog

  • Why AI Isn’t Replacing You—It’s Freeing You

    Why AI Isn’t Replacing You—It’s Freeing You

    Why AI Isn’t Replacing You—It’s Freeing You written by Jarret Redding read more at Duct Tape Marketing

    The Duct Tape Marketing Podcast with Keith Lauver In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, I interviewed Keith Lauver, a serial entrepreneur, product launch expert, and founder of Atomic Elevator—an AI-powered marketing company behind Ella, a high-definition marketing platform. With six startups and over $34 million in product launches under his belt, Keith […]

    Why AI Isn’t Replacing You—It’s Freeing You written by Jarret Redding read more at Duct Tape Marketing

    The Duct Tape Marketing Podcast with Keith Lauver

    In this episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast, I interviewed Keith Lauver, a serial entrepreneur, product launch expert, and founder of Atomic Elevator—an AI-powered marketing company behind Ella, a high-definition marketing platform. With six startups and over $34 million in product launches under his belt, Keith brings a sharp, practical lens to how AI can be used to transform marketing and business operations—especially for small business owners and agencies.

    During our conversation, Keith broke down the real-world applications of AI marketing and how it’s not here to replace people—but to remove bottlenecks, automate repetitive tasks, and unlock creativity. By shifting the way we think about tools like ChatGPT and agent-based workflows, Keith challenges small businesses to stop treating AI like search and start viewing it as a team of collaborators. He also shares how his own company operates without a traditional org chart—thanks to the power of strategic marketing tools and automation.

    Whether you’re leading a team, launching a new product, or running a solo consultancy, this episode offers a practical look at how AI and marketing automation can help you grow smarter, leaner, and more focused.

    Key Takeaways:

    • AI is an amplifier, not a replacement. It removes low-value tasks so entrepreneurs can focus on strategy, creativity, and relationships.
    • Small businesses are underusing AI tools. Many still treat AI like a search engine instead of leveraging its full potential for automation and productivity.
    • High-definition marketing creates clarity. Tools like Ella reduce “fuzzy” marketing by integrating proven marketing frameworks and better data.
    • Agent-based AI is coming. The future involves task-specific agents collaborating in workflows—streamlining execution across teams.
    • Forget the org chart. Keith’s company operates around tasks, not job titles—powered by AI and fractional expertise.
    • Personalization needs data. AI in business thrives when it can access behavior, style, and preferences—delivering truly tailored content.
    • AI unlocks your superpower. By automating what you’re not great at, it helps you focus on the work that energizes you and drives business growth.

    Chapters:

    • [00:09] Introducing Keith Lauver
    • [01:52] Understanding the Practical Uses of AI
    • [04:17] What are AI Agents?
    • [07:45] How Does AI Affect Organizational Structure
    • [11:46] AI Doesn’t Change Human Value
    • [16:22] Personalized Marketing
    • [17:37] Ella AI
    • [21:22] Privacy Concerns with AI

    More About Keith Lauver: 

    Check out Keith Lauver’s Website
    Connect with Keith Lauver on LinkedIn

    This episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast is brought to you by

    Want to elevate your marketing game? AdCritter pairs Connected TV ads with precise digital retargeting to drive real results. Discover how their full-funnel strategy can help your business grow smarter. Let them know Duct Tape Marketing sent you, and you’ll get a dollar-for-dollar match on your first campaign! Learn more at adcritter.com.

     

    John Jantsch (00:00.923)

    Hello and welcome to another episode of the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. This is John Jantsch. My guest today is Keith Lover. He is a serial entrepreneur and marketing expert who has founded six companies, raised over $34 million for product launches and now leads Atomic Elevator. His team specializes in product launch support and created Ella, a pioneering tool for high-definition marketing.

    He started his entrepreneurial journey at 14. He secured clients like Trader Joe’s, Whole Foods, and inspires others as a speaker and mentor. We were just talking about it. He lives in Red Lodge, Montana, active community in community service through Young Life. So Keith, welcome to the show.

    Keith Lauver (00:44.526)

    Thanks so much, John. Good beer.

    John Jantsch (00:46.172)

    So what did you do at 14?

    Keith Lauver (00:48.026)

    my gosh. So I had the opportunity to, build a software platform for an airport in Billings. was painting pipes in the summer and they found out I knew something about computers. And during the regular smoke break time, I started creating a database to keep track of the paper towels and other inventory got invited upstairs. That turned into an invitation to build the software.

    John Jantsch (00:56.883)

    Ha

    John Jantsch (01:09.907)

    Ha

    Keith Lauver (01:14.862)

    And apparently KPMG had offered him a bid for about $20,000. I said I’ll do it for two and they took it. So that was the very first commercial client I had.

    John Jantsch (01:26.547)

    Well, I think I started my first business when was 16. It was not nearly as glamorous. I was going door to door convincing people to let me seal their driveway. I paid my way through high school and college doing similar things.

    Keith Lauver (01:32.723)

    my gosh.

    Keith Lauver (01:38.016)

    That’s.

    Keith Lauver (01:44.072)

    I think the idea of asphalt going down and paint going up, we do what we have to do. I just caught a lucky break that day, right?

    John Jantsch (01:47.347)

    So we, we’re going to talk about, AI a lot today. I think, it’s a hot topic. It’s probably the hottest topic going right now. I, have, in fact, I’ve started a group I call practical AI for marketing. because I think it’s just a lot of, with any technology, there’s all this futuristic talk of what it can do.

    or what it, you know, is going to do someday. And I really liked always bring it down to, okay, that’s great, but what should it do? So in terms of, of your conversations with smaller businesses, how do you help them see the practical uses of AI and not sort of the robots running the world, you know, future.

    Keith Lauver (02:25.271)

    Yeah

    Keith Lauver (02:40.046)

    You know, one of things that I like to do is separate the application side of things from the construction side of things. And I think there’s a lot of people that are confused about that, John. think, you know, I’m reminded of a workshop that was being done for business owners in Montana a couple of weeks ago, and they brought in a prompt engineer and machine learning expert for the day to teach them how to do stuff that most of them really didn’t care about and frankly didn’t understand.

    John Jantsch (03:06.557)

    Right?

    Keith Lauver (03:08.738)

    that that was what was going to be the topic. So don’t think people even know what this beast called AI is. So there’s people who are building tools and then there’s people who are actually using tools. And those two probably need to be separated before I could even answer the next part of your question.

    John Jantsch (03:25.029)

    Yeah. Well, first off, then let’s back up a little bit. What percentage of businesses, business owners, people working for businesses, do you think are actually using even a simple interface like chat GPT?

    Keith Lauver (03:37.888)

    I think every business owner I’ve talked to has at least experimented with and tried chat GPT. When we take forms on our website, we ask them how frequently are they using it? And I would say that probably a quarter of them aren’t using it more than once a week. And that’s surprising to me. They still haven’t found that thing. And if I might offer a hypothesis about why, I think we are used to something like Google where

    John Jantsch (03:55.847)

    Yeah, yeah.

    Keith Lauver (04:06.978)

    You type in a search and a computer gives an answer. And AI’s potential is so much different than that. But most people are sitting down and thinking about this as a search tool and maybe a little bit smarter search tool. And they’re just not sure what’s beyond that even at the application layer.

    John Jantsch (04:25.757)

    So one of the things that, I don’t know, I, you you talked about bringing in this, large language model expert to talk about things and like that just goes nowhere with the business owners. So I’m going to bring up agents, which, know, maybe we have to kind of break down a little bit, but that’s one of the areas where people are like the future’s coming. You’re going to have, you know, agents replacing all of your people. We don’t actually have agents yet. Not really.

    because there’s a lot of things that I think are going to happen, over, mean, I think we’re going to have some simple task bots. but, but, but the one that people throw out, tell your agent to book me the best ticket on this flight, you know, blah, blah, blah. Well, they’ve got to have access to all the data, all the airline things. And those people aren’t going to share that information. Or if they do some big tech company, it’ll be the one that does the interface and we’ll just be a product of theirs like Facebook.

    Keith Lauver (05:20.994)

    Okay.

    John Jantsch (05:23.973)

    and not, not a user. talk, I just went and rambled all over the place there, but talk a little bit about, you know, the, the, where we are now with agents, what agents are, guess, where we are now and really what is going to be a hurdle to this large scale adoption.

    Keith Lauver (05:41.516)

    Yeah. So as I understand and use agents, they basically are bots, you will, programs that can perform a discrete task and do so in repetition and kind of string those tasks, perhaps one to another, to another. And instead of like right now, if you sit down and chat GPT and say, Hey,

    John Jantsch (05:49.203)

    you

    Keith Lauver (06:02.926)

    you know, can you give me input about a story or can you review this website and tell me the pros and the cons of it or whatever the query might be, an agent can actually do something that’s much more complex and a series of steps. So it might be, can you build me an entire website? Right? And step one is this and step two is this and step three, I think where agents are today,

    John Jantsch (06:18.621)

    Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

    Keith Lauver (06:27.538)

    is still very much in the experimental world. I love the fact that as a company that’s created a platform, we now can begin to move our entire architecture into what they’re calling agentic. So we’re able to take what we were finding other ways of doing and we can now do it better and easier because most of the things that we need to have done are complex and require more than one step and agents will help us do that.

    John Jantsch (06:40.883)

    Mm-hmm.

    John Jantsch (06:53.757)

    Yeah, no, there’ll be a lot of stringing these things together too, right? You complete this task and then go give your output to this agent who then has been trained to do X, right? I mean, is that kind of another way to look at it?

    Keith Lauver (06:57.55)

    for sure.

    Keith Lauver (07:02.487)

    Yeah.

    I love that vision, John, that really interoperability of agents. It’s like, why not have the thing that’s really good at X talk to the other thing that’s really good at Y and talk to the other thing that’s really good at Z. In the field of marketing, of the analog metaphor, if you will, would be the branding person who just is the wizard in the marketing world, right? They’re able to just say, this is the emotional state that we’re going to evoke for people.

    John Jantsch (07:12.179)

    Right.

    John Jantsch (07:31.123)

    Mm-hmm.

    Keith Lauver (07:34.254)

    pontificate on that. And then you’ve got the designer who tries to interpret that. And then you’ve got the copywriter who actually puts words to it. And then you’ve got the HTML person who has to construct it. And then maybe you’ve got somebody that needs to be the messaging architect that’s thinking about it. And then the performance person, we get all these different things. Wouldn’t it be great if those could all be strung together?

    John Jantsch (07:56.731)

    Yeah. And I think that’s a, maybe that’s a little bit of the dilemma of how people, when they’re thinking about embracing AI in general is that, you know, one, one vision I’ve seen is, the org chart that has maybe those, those analog managers, if you will, is that what we’re to call people now? Analog managers. but that, but then each of those people will have three agents that help them do their function.

    Keith Lauver (08:14.83)

    I hope so.

    John Jantsch (08:24.371)

    and they’ve all been maybe specifically trained on a thing, but then I’ve also seen people say, no, we’re going to have, we’re going to have the data analysis agent. That’s going to go across department. you know, how do you, how do you see the org chart of the future?

    Keith Lauver (08:39.266)

    You know, I think, the org chart of the future is probably going to be as diverse as organizations of the future. think models, what’s beautiful about what’s happening in this world is the models can be completely novel. can create things that have never before been seen. An example is, you know, we have been building our go-to-market plans using our software itself. We haven’t needed really a marketing department. even haven’t had to do.

    John Jantsch (08:40.305)

    Peace.

    John Jantsch (08:56.466)

    Yes.

    Keith Lauver (09:08.352)

    advertising in a traditional way. Most of our team is fully fractional and we can all cooperate and actually perform at a much higher level for a lot less money. And I don’t even know what an org chart is. We had a potential investor asked us to build one and I’m like, we haven’t, we don’t even have one for our company. It’s just not the way we operate. We kind of collect around tasks and bring expertise to those tasks and then perform those tasks.

    So it’s just a very different organizational model that we’ve chosen. And I think there’s a lot of freedom in how people are going to build the company.

    John Jantsch (09:43.827)

    But see, I hear an org chart in there. It’s just way different than anything we’ve been taught. So I think it’s still, because an org chart to me is not people doing jobs. An org chart is what functions need to be done. And so I think that’s kind of what you’re describing, but we’re all just used to this is our head of that and this is our VP of that. And I think that that whole, that’s what’s interesting about it. think what’s going on is it’s not just like,

    Keith Lauver (09:48.878)

    Yeah, yeah.

    Keith Lauver (09:57.516)

    Ooh, I love that. Different, yeah.

    John Jantsch (10:13.405)

    How do we augment what we’re already doing? It’s how do we rethink everything, right?

    Keith Lauver (10:18.772)

    I love the freedom. think the moment, when we accidentally discovered this idea that turned into this platform for marketing, call Ella, when this was not an intentional discovery, it was pure accident. And in that moment, every single neuron in my brain fired every pattern from that 14 year old kid who wrote the software for that airport and Billings to the guy who’d been a student of marketing for the last decade fired and said, wait a minute.

    I can do this differently now and I can ask this question in this way and get a completely different perspective than the old model was go to the expert. If we invert and put all the experts into a model, it shifts and everything changes. And I’m addicted to that innovation. So I think it’s wonderful.

    John Jantsch (11:07.633)

    Yeah. Yeah. So, one of the certainly themes that is prevalent is that this technology is going to replace a lot of people. mean, every technology does, right? I mean, or at least changes, you know, what those people do. Where do you fall on kind of the, it’s going to revolutionize industries, replace a lot of people, augment, you know, lot of the value we can bring. I mean, where do you fall on that?

    Keith Lauver (11:20.814)

    you

    John Jantsch (11:37.867)

    continue.

    Keith Lauver (11:39.342)

    So yes, yes, and yes. I do think that AI is going to transform, to augment, to replace. But I don’t think that changes our sense of self. I don’t think that changes our value of fact. If anything, for me, what it’s done is created more freedom around that. I talked to so many people on our team. We’re avid minute by minute users of AI.

    John Jantsch (11:41.391)

    Yeah, OK.

    John Jantsch (11:50.034)

    Yeah.

    Keith Lauver (12:08.974)

    We’re more confident in what we can do and in the gifts that we’ve been created to bring to the world because we augment the things that maybe we’re not as good at. I’m a visionary, I’m not an integrator. So I see big ideas and when you ask me to actually turn that into a you know, a set of sequential steps, I just, my brain hurts. I don’t like that work and I don’t have to do that work anymore. So.

    John Jantsch (12:13.939)

    Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.

    John Jantsch (12:35.795)

    Yeah. Peace.

    Keith Lauver (12:36.246)

    I think it’s not replacing people, but it’s replacing some of the things that we as people have done. And what that does is gives us the freedom to go back to what is our zone of genius? What is our superpower? What is it that we love to do? And I don’t think AI will ever replace humanity. I think it’s just bringing us up to be the very best versions of ourselves.

    John Jantsch (12:41.317)

    Yeah.

    John Jantsch (12:57.395)

    Well, it’s interesting because I certainly, I’ve always, you know, from a marketing standpoint, we’ve, our monitor has always been strategy before tactics. Um, and I think that in a lot of ways that makes the strategic thinker who can also master AI, who also understands marketing operations. That’s the job of the future, isn’t it? As opposed to the agency that comes in and does the stuff.

    Keith Lauver (13:22.06)

    I think that’s right. I would say our focus has actually been trying to go in and provide even greater effectiveness and efficiency for the strategists. And so because of that, I see a world where AI can actually do a lot of the strategy when well-guided and augmented by humans through that. I would say for me, as I’ve contemplated kind of my own work shift in the last, say, year, most of my time is now relational.

    And that can’t ever be replaced by AI. Most of my time is getting to understand people and their problems and then finding a way to bring that in. But I’m not spending time on strategies so much as I am building relationships that allow my tools to build that strategy. So I think that’s a higher level.

    John Jantsch (14:12.413)

    Yeah.

    Well, there’s such a, even though it’s more one-to-one, there is such a brand aspect to that. There is such a trust aspect to that. And I think that those are the things that are really going to allow the, if there’s going to be winners and losers, I think people that get that, think are going to side on the win.

    Keith Lauver (14:23.063)

    Ooh, I love that. Yeah.

    Keith Lauver (14:33.326)

    You know what I love about what you said there too is just kind of reminds me of the benefit to AI in getting us out of ourselves that if we’re going to be able to establish trust, one of the ways that I do this today that I did in 12 months ago is I talk about the fact that I run everything I do through a blind spot and a bias detector. I run everything I do through the lens of our software.

    that can look at 100 different marketing people’s perspectives. And that actually increases my trustworthiness, my credibility with somebody because I’m actually admitting my own limitations.

    John Jantsch (15:05.811)

    Mm-hmm.

    John Jantsch (15:16.339)

    Yeah, yeah, that’s one of my favorite prompts is like, what should I be asking you? Or what am I not asking you? You know, that kind of thing, you know, or, or I sometimes have to say, stop agreeing with me. That’s a brilliant idea.

    Keith Lauver (15:24.43)

    Yeah.

    Yes. I like to think that my AI is sometimes a little bit too puppy-like. You know, it just wants to wag its tail and say, yes, Keith, I love you. Will you rub my belly? It’s like, yeah. Exactly. It’s like, no, no, no. Or even when I ask AI to be to go do something and the end result, if I say, is this biased? And she says, yes. I’m like, well, why did you do that in that way in the first place? So.

    John Jantsch (15:54.021)

    Right. So, so, I have one more question, but I really do want, we haven’t, I want to spend some time on what you’re doing specifically with Ella because it relates to everything we’re talking about. But, one of the things that, anybody who says the five things that are coming this year, you know, personalization in marketing is, certainly a buzzword that’s going to be on that list all the time. is, is, and it seems AI can help that.

    But I also don’t see a lot of people doing it yet. And is the real missing ingredient is it can’t personalize without access to data.

    Keith Lauver (16:33.304)

    think that’s a great insight. think I would challenge how much data we can give it access to. would say in general, I’ll give you an example. I love what there’s a tool called Crystal Nose has done, which is they’ve used AI to go, you know, essentially determine somebody’s personality. And that gives you a degree of personalization to present information in a particular style. So for example, anytime I do a sales follow-up,

    I run it first through Crystal and I have Ella rewrite it to that person’s disc profile. And that gives me a level of personalization that’s not just this was the conversation we had, but this is who you are and how you probably prefer to receive information. So I think we’re getting closer to it.

    John Jantsch (17:17.169)

    Yeah. Yeah. And it might just be bullet points and short sentences as opposed to, you know, necessarily, hi, John. Exactly. Right. Right. So talk a little bit about Ella. If somebody came to you and said, what’s Ella?

    Keith Lauver (17:26.321)

    Yes. Exactly. These are the three things we talked about. Sign here.

    Keith Lauver (17:38.86)

    Yeah, so we describe Ella as a high definition marketing machine. And the reason that we’ve chosen to describe her that way is we have found as professional marketers that most marketing has historically been very fuzzy. The fuzziness has been caused by specializations and fragmentation, right? The fuzziness has been caused by shifts in tactics and expectations. And the fuzziness is the fact that at the end of the day,

    Most marketing is really a hypothesis that needs to be tested out there anyway. So it’s social science, it’s behavioral science. And so what we’ve said is let’s try to provide more pixels to the picture. Let’s take frameworks and connect them. Let’s take pictures and define them in greater resolution. Let’s interconnect them so that when somebody says, I want to talk to John about duct tape marketing,

    John Jantsch (18:10.515)

    Yeah.

    Keith Lauver (18:34.37)

    they’re able to do so with just a high degree of precision. So Ella is a tool that enables better messaging, more discrete personas, and essentially better results because of this high definition process.

    John Jantsch (18:49.907)

    Yeah, boy, will say, you you used a fate, one of my favorite words, frameworks. Um, you know, one of the best things you can do if you’re trying to get some sort of output out of, uh, out of an AI tool is, is to say, use this framework, uh, that’s well-defined. think at least it gives it some guardrails to say, okay, you know, I’m not just going to write something that hopefully sounds good. You’re going to write something that.

    Keith Lauver (19:04.216)

    Yes.

    John Jantsch (19:14.875)

    maybe is using a proven framework. And so it’s going to be more effective right off the bat, whether or not the outputs, know, word for word, what you’re going to use, at least the structure will be there.

    Keith Lauver (19:18.093)

    Yeah.

    Keith Lauver (19:25.538)

    Yeah, I think frameworks, you know, I got drawn into the idea of frameworks because I was a computer guy who fell into the field of marketing, right? I’m used to here is a subroutine. If you’re going to tell a story, here’s seven blanks to fill in. Donald Miller, thank you for giving me the seven blanks to fill in. Like I need that kind of thing. And what has been true about all the frameworks, at least that I’ve experienced is while fantastic, they’ve always been discreet.

    John Jantsch (19:32.541)

    Yeah. Yeah, yeah.

    John Jantsch (19:44.381)

    Yes, exactly.

    Keith Lauver (19:55.008)

    and probably more unitaskers. So they’re fantastic for one thing, but they are often missing another thing. And what, least in my mind has been the missing link to all of this is a unifying, almost marketing operating system that pulls all those frameworks together. And that’s the big aspiration for what we’re trying to build.

    John Jantsch (19:59.675)

    Yeah, yeah.

    John Jantsch (20:16.817)

    Now, are you staying very focused on the niche market of, and I thought I read this, of SaaS go to market, or are really putting yourself out there as any type of business or industry?

    Keith Lauver (20:27.21)

    yeah.

    Keith Lauver (20:31.756)

    Yeah, we started in the field of SaaS. Obviously, we are too a SaaS product and understand those frameworks very well. But as Ella has so quickly grown, people are contributing their own frameworks. We’ve got authors who are saying, use mine. Or we’ve got practitioners who say, have you heard about this amazing system called duct tape? And I’m like, yes. Yes, I have. And so we’re trying to integrate those. And so

    John Jantsch (20:36.147)

    Sure.

    John Jantsch (20:47.251)

    Sure. Right.

    John Jantsch (20:52.999)

    Hehehehehe

    Keith Lauver (20:58.988)

    The idea of Ella is she can help with B2B, B2C, really across industries. And she’s getting smarter every single time somebody uses her and at least volunteers their feedback to Ella.

    John Jantsch (21:13.619)

    So one question that comes up a lot of times and will probably be continued to be debated forever, but are there privacy concerns? You know, I’m sharing all of my personal company data. that something or, or, you know, as an agency, I’m sharing my clients data. Is that an issue with a model like, or a tool like Ella?

    Keith Lauver (21:36.64)

    It is an issue for all AI and Ella has decided to respond to that with kind of a very clear privacy policy, a very clear non-disclosure agreement that we enter into, and also very clear technical parameters where we have opted out underlying our tool is OpenAI, but we have basically disallowed OpenAI from using any prompt

    for training purposes, any prompt for storage purposes. And so we can say with confidence that we are protecting the confidentiality of that information. And I think it is important that we do that.

    John Jantsch (22:15.461)

    Awesome. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I think that’s going to be, you know, a raging debate for some time. And I think we’ll end up having, won’t we end up having the same thing that happened to the search engines, that, you know, the, the, all the privacy and all the stuff that they’re, they’ve been doing and not telling anybody. We’ll, we’ll come back to in lawsuits probably.

    Keith Lauver (22:35.31)

    I am excited to see how intellectual property will continue to evolve around all of this. But in the meantime, we’re going to let people do great work and keep what they’re doing private.

    John Jantsch (22:38.291)

    Yeah. Yeah.

    John Jantsch (22:47.155)

    Well, Keith, I appreciate you taking a moment to stop by the Duct Tape Marketing Podcast. Is there someplace you’d send folks to learn more about Atomic Elevator and your work?

    Keith Lauver (22:56.652)

    You bet, AtomicElevator.com and we’ve got free trials available. We’d love to sign up anybody. Let them take Elifer spin for a couple of weeks and see what kind of impact you can make for their clients.

    John Jantsch (23:08.627)

    Again, appreciate you taking a moment and maybe I’ll run into you one of these days next time I’m up in Montana.

    Keith Lauver (23:15.713)

    I hope that would be the case.

    powered by

     

  • The Woman in the Yard: Inside a Blumhouse Ghost Story Shattering Every Stereotype

    The Woman in the Yard: Inside a Blumhouse Ghost Story Shattering Every Stereotype

    It is in large light. In a farmhouse’s garden is a tall, all-black woman with a terrifying black veil covering her face. In the length, acres upon acres of land are left vacant. The Woman in ] is Blumhouse Productions ‘ newest horror film, and this is the first picture we can see of it on the film’s screens.

    On Den of Geek, the second post was The Person in the Yard: Inside a Blumhouse Ghost Story Breaking Every Myth.

    When Doctor Doom posed as Robert Downey Jr., who would be appearing in Avengers: Doomsday, at San Diego Comic-Con next month, Marvel shocked everyone. And then Marvel&#8217 is doing something equally daring to show the rest of the Avengers: Doomsday cast. Marvel Studios is revealing &#8230, seats on their main Twitter feed.

    Okay, yes, they’ve changed the chair ‘ labels! But they &#8217, re however chair.

    We see a new couch and a fresh cast member &#8217, s name on it at intervals of 10-15 hours. Which is a little annoying if you’re a regular person who doesn’t have a lot of time on Wednesday to enjoy just shots of chairs all time. Thankfully, we are not just regular folks around at Den of Geek. We’ll keep an eye on these chair’ show and make updates as they occur! With each fresh brand added, this article will be updated; check back often to see if it’s changed.

    Pedro Pascal

    Channing Temple as Gambit in Deadpool & Wolverine

    Channing Temple

    James Marsden as Cyclops

    James Marsden

    Rebecca Romjin as Mystique copy

    Rachel Romijn

    Alan Cumming in X2

    Alan Cumming

    Ian McKellen as Magneto

    Ian McKellen

    Patrick Stewart in X-Men poster

    Patrick Stewart

    Chris Hemsworth in Thor Love and Thunder Art

    Chris Hemsworth

    Vanessa Kirby

    Joseph Quinn

    Bucky Barnes in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Sebastian Stan

    Anthony Mackie

    Shuri in Black Panther 2 Ending

    Letitia Wright

    Paul Rudd in Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

    Paul Rudd

    Loki (Tom Hiddleston) stabilizes the Temporal Loom and achieves his Glorious Purpose

    Tom Hiddleston

    Winston Duke in Black Panther 2

    Winston Duke

    Tenoch Huerta as Namor in Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

    Tenoch Huerta Mejária

    Ebon Moss-Bacharach

    Shang-Chi dominates Box Office for Marvel
    cnx. powershell. push ( function ( ) {cnx ( {playerId:” 106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530″, }). render ( “0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796” ), }),

    Simu Liu

    Florence Pugh and Scarlett Johansson in Black Widow

    Florence Pugh

    Beast in the Marvels

    Kelsey Grammer

    David Harbour as Red Guardian in Marvel's Black Widow

    David Harbour

    Hannah John-Kamen as Ghost in Marvel

    Hannah John-Kamen

    Russell, Wyatt as John Walker in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Russell, Wyatt

    Lewis Pullman in Thunderbolts

    Lewis Pullman

    Danny Ramirez in Captain America Brave New World

    Danny Ramirez

    The first article on Den of Geek: Avengers: Doomsday Cast Announced &#8211, Updated Live.

  • Ike Barinholtz Did Not Care for Seth Rogen’s Driving in Apple TV+’s The Studio

    Ike Barinholtz Did Not Care for Seth Rogen’s Driving in Apple TV+’s The Studio

    The Studio raises the notion that praise is the sincerest form of flattery to a whole new level. The Apple TV + comedy series, which was co-produced by legendary comedic collaborators Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg ( along with Peter Huyck, Alex Gregory, and Frida Perez ), delves so far into its satire of Hollywood that it defies definition as a major Hollywood production itself. Rogen ]…]

    The second article on Den of Geek was Ike Barinholtz did not care for Seth Rogen’s driving in Apple TV +’s The Studio.

    Marvel shocked all at San Diego Comic-Con last month when Doctor Doom emerged as Robert Downey Jr., who would be appearing in Avengers: Doomsday. And then Marvel&#8217 is doing something equally daring to show the rest of the Avengers: Doomsday cast. Marvel Studios is revealing seats on their principal Twitter feed.

    Okay, yes, they’ve changed the chair ‘ labels! But they &#8217, re still chair.

    We notice a new couch and a new put member’s name on it every 10-15 days. Which is a little annoying if you’re a regular person who doesn’t have a lot of time to enjoy just shots of chairs all day in the middle of the week. Luckily, we at Den of Geek are not just regular folks. We’ll keep an eye on these chairs and publish a report on each show as it occurs! With each fresh brand added, this article will be updated; check back often to see if it’s changed.

    Pedro Pascal

    Channing Temple as Gambit in Deadpool & Wolverine

    Channing Temple

    James Marsden as Cyclops

    James Marsden

    Rebecca Romjin as Mystique copy

    Elizabeth Romijn

    Alan Cumming in X2

    Alan Cumming

    Ian McKellen as Magneto

    Ian McKellen

    Stewart, Patrick in X-Men poster

    Stewart, Patrick

    Chris Hemsworth in Thor Love and Thunder Art

    Chris Hemsworth

    Vanessa Kirby

    Joseph Quinn

    Bucky Barnes in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Sebastian Stan

    Anthony Mackie

    Shuri in Black Panther 2 Ending

    Letitia Wright

    Paul Rudd in Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

    Paul Rudd

    Loki (Tom Hiddleston) stabilizes the Temporal Loom and achieves his Glorious Purpose

    Tom Hiddleston

    Winston Duke in Black Panther 2

    Winston Duke

    Tenoch Huerta as Namor in Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

    Tenoch Huerta Mejária

    Ebon Moss-Bacharach

    Shang-Chi dominates Box Office for Marvel
    cnx. command. push ( function ( ) {cnx ( {playerId:” 106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530″, }). render ( “0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796” ), }),

    Simu Liu

    Florence Pugh and Scarlett Johansson in Black Widow

    Florence Pugh

    Beast in the Marvels

    Kelsey Grammer

    Harbour, David as Red Guardian in Marvel's Black Widow

    Harbour, David

    Hannah John-Kamen as Ghost in Marvel

    Hannah John-Kamen

    Wyatt Russell as John Walker in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Wyatt Russell

    Lewis Pullman in Thunderbolts

    Lewis Pullman

    Danny Ramirez in Captain America Brave New World

    Danny Ramirez

    The first article on Den of Geek: Avengers: Doomsday Cast Announced &#8211, Updated Live appeared second.

  • How The Office Redefined the Mockumentary Format For Modern Television

    How The Office Redefined the Mockumentary Format For Modern Television

    A television program from every generation has an impact on the landscape of popular culture long. In the 1980s, it was Cheers ‘ feel-good lecture, and in the 1990s, it was Seinfeld’s wonderfully commonplace environment. And in the 2000s, it was the tongue-in-cheek tale that dominated The Office, which is undoubtedly the most adored comedy line ever.

    The first article on Den of Geek was How The Office Redefined the Mockumentary Format For Modern Television.

    Marvel shocked the audience at San Diego Comic-Con next month when Doctor Doom emerged as Robert Downey Jr., who would be appearing in Avengers: Doomsday. Marvel is presently revealing the rest of the Avengers: Doomsday cast in an equally bold manner. Marvel Studios is revealing seats on their primary Twitter feed.

    Okay, yes, they’re seats with labels on them! But they &#8217, re still chair.

    We notice a new couch and a new put member’s name on it every 10-15 days. Which is a little annoying if you’re a regular person who doesn’t have a lot of time on Wednesday to watch just shots of chairs all time. Thankfully, we are not just regular folks around at Den of Geek. We’ll keep an eye on these chairs and publish a report on each show as it occurs! With each fresh name added, this article will be updated; check back often to see if it’s changed.

    Pedro Pascal

    Channing Temple as Gambit in Deadpool & Wolverine

    Channing Temple

    James Marsden as Cyclops

    James Marsden

    Rebecca Romjin as Mystique copy

    Elizabeth Romijn

    Alan Cumming in X2

    Alan Cumming

    Ian McKellen as Magneto

    Ian McKellen

    Stewart, Patrick in X-Men poster

    Stewart, Patrick

    Chris Hemsworth in Thor Love and Thunder Art

    Chris Hemsworth

    Vanessa Kirby

    Joseph Quinn

    Bucky Barnes in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Sebastian Stan

    Anthony Mackie

    Shuri in Black Panther 2 Ending

    Letitia Wright

    Paul Rudd in Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

    Paul Rudd

    Loki (Tom Hiddleston) stabilizes the Temporal Loom and achieves his Glorious Purpose

    Tom Hiddleston

    Winston Duke in Black Panther 2

    Winston Duke

    Tenoch Huerta as Namor in Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

    Tenoch Huerta Mejária

    Ebon Moss-Bacharach

    Shang-Chi dominates Box Office for Marvel
    cnx. powershell. push ( function ( ) {cnx ( {playerId:” 106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530″, }). render ( “0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796” ), }),

    Simu Liu

    Florence Pugh and Scarlett Johansson in Black Widow

    Florence Pugh

    Beast in the Marvels

    Kelsey Grammer

    David Harbour as Red Guardian in Marvel's Black Widow

    David Harbour

    Hannah John-Kamen as Ghost in Marvel

    Hannah John-Kamen

    Wyatt Russell as John Walker in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Wyatt Russell

    Lewis Pullman in Thunderbolts

    Lewis Pullman

    Danny Ramirez in Captain America Brave New World

    Danny Ramirez

    The first article on Den of Geek: Avengers: Doomsday Cast Announced &#8211, Updated Live.

  • New British TV Series for 2025: BBC, Netflix, ITV, Channel 4, Disney+, Prime Video, Sky

    New British TV Series for 2025: BBC, Netflix, ITV, Channel 4, Disney+, Prime Video, Sky

    Missing You, the most recent payment of Netflix’s now-traditional New Week’s Day Harlan Coben movies, hit the ground running in 2025 with American TV. Following that, crime plays Patience and Prime Target, traditional action set A Thousand Blows, 1980s relaunch Bergerac, and numerous others that are still awaiting an air date announcement. Browse ]…]

    The first episode of Den of Geek was titled” New British TV Series for 2025″: BBC, Netflix, ITV, Channel 4, Disney+, Prime Video, Sky.

    When Doctor Doom posed as Robert Downey Jr., who would be appearing in Avengers: Doomsday, at San Diego Comic-Con next month, Marvel shocked everyone. Marvel is presently revealing the rest of the Avengers: Doomsday cast in an equally bold manner. Marvel Studios is revealing seats on their main Instagram supply.

    Okay, yes, they’re seats with names on them! But they &#8217, re still chair.

    We see a new couch and a fresh cast member &#8217, s name on it at intervals of 10-15 days. Which is a little annoying if you’re a regular person who doesn’t have a lot of time on Wednesday to enjoy just shots of chairs all time. Thankfully, we are not just regular folks around at Den of Geek. We’ll keep an eye on these chair’ show and make updates as they occur! With each fresh brand added, this article will be updated; check back often to see if it’s changed.

    Pedro Pascal

    Channing Turner as Gambit in Deadpool & Wolverine

    Channing Turner

    James Marsden as Cyclops

    James Marsden

    Rebecca Romjin as Mystique copy

    Rachel Romijn

    Alan Cumming in X2

    Alan Cumming

    Ian McKellen as Magneto

    Ian McKellen

    Stewart, Patrick in X-Men poster

    Stewart, Patrick

    Chris Hemsworth in Thor Love and Thunder Art

    Chris Hemsworth

    Vanessa Kirby

    Joseph Quinn

    Bucky Barnes in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Sebastian Stan

    Anthony Mackie

    Shuri in Black Panther 2 Ending

    Letitia Wright

    Paul Rudd in Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

    Paul Rudd

    Loki (Tom Hiddleston) stabilizes the Temporal Loom and achieves his Glorious Purpose

    Tom Hiddleston

    Winston Duke in Black Panther 2

    Winston Duke

    Tenoch Huerta as Namor in Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

    Tenoch Huerta Mejária

    Ebon Moss-Bacharach

    Shang-Chi dominates Box Office for Marvel
    cnx. powershell. push ( function ( ) {cnx ( {playerId:” 106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530″, }). render ( “0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796” ), }),

    Simu Liu

    Florence Pugh and Scarlett Johansson in Black Widow

    Florence Pugh

    Beast in the Marvels

    Kelsey Grammer

    David Harbour as Red Guardian in Marvel's Black Widow

    David Harbour

    Hannah John-Kamen as Ghost in Marvel

    Hannah John-Kamen

    Wyatt Russell as John Walker in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Wyatt Russell

    Lewis Pullman in Thunderbolts

    Lewis Pullman

    Danny Ramirez in Captain America Brave New World

    Danny Ramirez

    The second article on Den of Geek: Avengers: Doomsday Cast Announced &#8211, Updated Live.

  • Daredevil: Born Again Just Hinted at Ms. Marvel’s Next Adventure

    Daredevil: Born Again Just Hinted at Ms. Marvel’s Next Adventure

    Episode 5 of Daredevil: Born Suddenly has clues in this post. World soldiers Daredevil and Ms. Marvel are indistinguishable from one another, but it’s difficult to imagine any two. No matter how harshly it punishes his head, body, or heart, the former is a blind person driven by grief and anger toward vigilantism. The latter is an]…]

    The first article Daredevil: Born Once Really Hinted at Ms. Marvel’s Second Experience was published on Den of Geek.

    When Doctor Doom posed as Robert Downey Jr., who would be appearing in Avengers: Doomsday, at San Diego Comic-Con next month, Marvel shocked everyone. And then Marvel is doing something the same bold as revealing the rest of the Avengers: Doomsday cast. Marvel Studios is revealing &#8230, seats on their main Twitter feed.

    Okay, yes, they’re seats with labels on them! But they &#8217, re however chair.

    We observe a new couch and a fresh cast member &#8217, s name on it at intervals of 10-15 hours. Which is a little annoying if you’re a regular person who doesn’t have a lot of time on Wednesday to watch just shots of chairs all time. Thankfully, we at Den of Geek are not just regular people. We will keep an eye on these chairs and publish a report on each show as it occurs! With each fresh name added, this article will be updated; check back often to see if it’s changed.

    Pedro Pascal

    Channing Turner as Gambit in Deadpool & Wolverine

    Channing Turner

    James Marsden as Cyclops

    James Marsden

    Rebecca Romjin as Mystique copy

    Elizabeth Romijn

    Alan Cumming in X2

    Alan Cumming

    Ian McKellen as Magneto

    Ian McKellen

    Stewart, Patrick in X-Men poster

    Stewart, Patrick

    Chris Hemsworth in Thor Love and Thunder Art

    Chris Hemsworth

    Vanessa Kirby

    Joseph Quinn

    Bucky Barnes in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Sebastian Stan

    Anthony Mackie

    Shuri in Black Panther 2 Ending

    Letitia Wright

    Paul Rudd in Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

    Paul Rudd

    Loki (Tom Hiddleston) stabilizes the Temporal Loom and achieves his Glorious Purpose

    Tom Hiddleston

    Winston Duke in Black Panther 2

    Winston Duke

    Tenoch Huerta as Namor in Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

    Tenoch Huerta Mejária

    Ebon Moss-Bacharach

    Shang-Chi dominates Box Office for Marvel
    cnx. powershell. push ( function ( ) {cnx ( {playerId:” 106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530″, }). render ( “0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796” ), }),

    Simu Liu

    Florence Pugh and Scarlett Johansson in Black Widow

    Florence Pugh

    Beast in the Marvels

    Kelsey Grammer

    David Harbour as Red Guardian in Marvel's Black Widow

    David Harbour

    Hannah John-Kamen as Ghost in Marvel

    Hannah John-Kamen

    Wyatt Russell as John Walker in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Wyatt Russell

    Lewis Pullman in Thunderbolts

    Lewis Pullman

    Danny Ramirez in Captain America Brave New World

    Danny Ramirez

    The first article on Den of Geek: Avengers: Doomsday Cast Announced &#8211, Updated Live appeared second.

  • James Bond Has New Producers, So Maybe We Can Stop Freaking Out

    James Bond Has New Producers, So Maybe We Can Stop Freaking Out

    It’s not simple to be a James Bond enthusiast. The behind-the-scenes play to actually make these movies seems never-ending, not to mention that the franchise seems to be teetering on the brink of social indifference. 007 devotedists and relaxed video fans were shocked to learn that Barbara Broccoli and Michael […] were the first two to release this time.

    The first article James Bond Has New Producers, But Maybe We Can Prevent Freaking Out was a blog on Den of Geek.

    Marvel shocked the audience at San Diego Comic-Con last month when Doctor Doom emerged as Robert Downey Jr., who would be appearing in Avengers: Doomsday. And then Marvel&#8217 is doing something equally daring to show the rest of the Avengers: Doomsday cast. Marvel Studios is revealing &#8230, seats on their main Twitter feed.

    Okay, yes, they’re seats with names on them! But they &#8217, re however chair.

    We notice a new couch and a new put member’s name on it every 10-15 days. Which is a little annoying if you’re a regular person who doesn’t have a lot of time on Wednesday to watch just shots of chairs all time. Thankfully, we are not just regular people around at Den of Geek. We will keep an eye on these chairs and publish a report on each show as it occurs! With each fresh name added, this article will be updated; check back often to see if there are any changes.

    Pedro Pascal

    Channing Temple as Gambit in Deadpool & Wolverine

    Channing Temple

    James Marsden as Cyclops

    James Marsden

    Rebecca Romjin as Mystique copy

    Elizabeth Romijn

    Alan Cumming in X2

    Alan Cumming

    Ian McKellen as Magneto

    Ian McKellen

    Stewart, Patrick in X-Men poster

    Stewart, Patrick

    Chris Hemsworth in Thor Love and Thunder Art

    Chris Hemsworth

    Vanessa Kirby

    Joseph Quinn

    Bucky Barnes in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Sebastian Stan

    Anthony Mackie

    Shuri in Black Panther 2 Ending

    Letitia Wright

    Rudd, Paul in Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

    Rudd, Paul

    Loki (Tom Hiddleston) stabilizes the Temporal Loom and achieves his Glorious Purpose

    Tom Hiddleston

    Winston Duke in Black Panther 2

    Winston Duke

    Tenoch Huerta as Namor in Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

    Tenoch Huerta Mejária

    Ebon Moss-Bacharach

    Shang-Chi dominates Box Office for Marvel
    cnx. powershell. push ( function ( ) {cnx ( {playerId:” 106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530″, }). render ( “0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796” ), }),

    Simu Liu

    Florence Pugh and Scarlett Johansson in Black Widow

    Florence Pugh

    Beast in the Marvels

    Kelsey Grammer

    Harbour, David as Red Guardian in Marvel's Black Widow

    Harbour, David

    Hannah John-Kamen as Ghost in Marvel

    Hannah John-Kamen

    Wyatt Russell as John Walker in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Wyatt Russell

    Lewis Pullman in Thunderbolts

    Lewis Pullman

    Danny Ramirez in Captain America Brave New World

    Danny Ramirez

    The first article on Den of Geek: Avengers: Doomsday Cast Announced &#8211, Updated Live appeared second.

  • Avengers: Doomsday Cast Announced – Updated Live

    Avengers: Doomsday Cast Announced – Updated Live

    When Doctor Doom posed as Robert Downey Jr., who would be appearing in Avengers: Doomsday, onstage and removed his helmet, Marvel shocked all at San Diego Comic-Con next year. And then Marvel is making an equally bold announcement about the rest of the Avengers: Doomsday cast. Marvel[/ ] [ / ] on their main Twitter feed.

    The second article Updated Live for the Avengers: Doomsday Cast was published on Den of Geek.

    Marvel shocked the audience at San Diego Comic-Con last month when Doctor Doom emerged as Robert Downey Jr., who would be appearing in Avengers: Doomsday. Marvel is presently revealing the rest of the Avengers: Doomsday cast in an equally bold manner. Marvel Studios is revealing &#8230, seats on their main Twitter feed.

    Okay, yes, they’ve changed the seats so they’ve got titles on them! But they &#8217, re still chair.

    We see a new couch and a fresh cast member &#8217, s name on it at intervals of 10-15 hours. Which is a little annoying if you’re a regular person who doesn’t have a lot of time to enjoy just shots of chairs all day in the middle of the week. Thankfully, we are not just regular people around at Den of Geek. We’ll keep an eye on these chair’ show and make updates as they occur! With each fresh brand added, this article will be updated; check back often to see if there are any changes.

    Pedro Pascal

    Channing Temple as Gambit in Deadpool & Wolverine

    Channing Temple

    James Marsden as Cyclops

    James Marsden

    Rebecca Romjin as Mystique copy

    Rachel Romijn

    Alan Cumming in X2

    Alan Cumming

    Ian McKellen as Magneto

    Ian McKellen

    Patrick Stewart in X-Men poster

    Patrick Stewart

    Chris Hemsworth in Thor Love and Thunder Art

    Chris Hemsworth

    Vanessa Kirby

    Joseph Quinn

    Bucky Barnes in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Sebastian Stan

    Anthony Mackie

    Shuri in Black Panther 2 Ending

    Letitia Wright

    Paul Rudd in Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

    Paul Rudd

    Loki (Tom Hiddleston) stabilizes the Temporal Loom and achieves his Glorious Purpose

    Tom Hiddleston

    Winston Duke in Black Panther 2

    Winston Duke

    Tenoch Huerta as Namor in Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

    Tenoch Huerta Mejária

    Ebon Moss-Bacharach

    Shang-Chi dominates Box Office for Marvel
    cnx. powershell. push ( function ( ) {cnx ( {playerId:” 106e33c0-3911-473c-b599-b1426db57530″, }). render ( “0270c398a82f44f49c23c16122516796” ), }),

    Simu Liu

    Florence Pugh and Scarlett Johansson in Black Widow

    Florence Pugh

    Beast in the Marvels

    Kelsey Grammer

    David Harbour as Red Guardian in Marvel's Black Widow

    David Harbour

    Hannah John-Kamen as Ghost in Marvel

    Hannah John-Kamen

    Wyatt Russell as John Walker in The Falcon and the Winter Soldier

    Wyatt Russell

    Lewis Pullman in Thunderbolts

    Lewis Pullman

    Danny Ramirez in Captain America Brave New World

    Danny Ramirez

    The first article on Den of Geek: Avengers: Doomsday Cast Announced &#8211, Updated Live appeared second.

  • Beware the Cut ‘n’ Paste Persona

    Beware the Cut ‘n’ Paste Persona

    This Person Does Not Exist is a website that uses a machine learning algorithm to create individual eyes. It takes actual photos and recombines them into false human faces. We just squinted past a LinkedIn post that claimed this site might be helpful “if you are developing a image and looking for a photo.”

    We agree: the computer-generated heads could be a great fit for personas—but not for the purpose you might think. Ironically, the website highlights the core issue of this very common design method: the person ( a ) does not exist. Personas are deliberately created, much like in the pictures. Data is taken out of natural environment and recombined into an isolated preview that’s detached from reality.

    However, it’s odd that designers use personalities to guide their style in the real world.

    Personas: A action up

    Most manufacturers have created, used, or come across personalities at least once in their job. The Interaction Design Foundation defines profile as “fictional characters that you create based on your research in order to represent the various consumer types that might use your company, product, blog, or brand,” according to their article” Personas- A Simple Introduction.” In their most complete expression, personas typically consist of a name, profile picture, quotes, demographics, goals, needs, behavior in relation to a certain service/product, emotions, and motivations ( for example, see Creative Companion’s Persona Core Poster ). According to design firm Designit, the goal of personas is” to make the research relatable, ]and ] easy to communicate, digest, reference, and apply to product and service development.”

    The decontextualization of identities

    Personas are common because they make “dry” research information more realistic, more people. However, this approach places a cap on the study’s ability to analyze the data in a way that excludes the subjects from their particular contexts. As a result, personalities don’t describe important factors that make you realize their decision-making method or allow you to connect to users ‘ thoughts and behavior, they lack stories. You are aware of the persona’s actions, but you lack the history knowledge to understand why. You end up with images of people that are really less people.

    This “decontextualization” we see in identities happens in four way, which we’ll discuss below.

    People are assumed to be dynamic, according to people.

    Although many companies still try to box in their employees and customers with outdated personality tests ( referring to you, Myers-Briggs ), here’s a painfully obvious truth: people are not a fixed set of features. Depending on how you feel, how you act, think, and think, what you do and do. You appear distinct to different people, you may act pleasant to some, tough to others. And you change your mind all the time about choices you’ve taken.

    Modern psychology agree that while people typically act in accordance with specific patterns, how they act and make decisions is influenced by a combination of both their environment and background. The context—the atmosphere, the effect of other people, your feelings, the whole story that led up to a situation—determines the kind of person you are in each particular time.

    Personas do not account for this variation in their attempt to improve reality; instead, they present a consumer as a set of features. Like character testing, personas seize people away from real life. Even worse, individuals are reduced to a brand and categorized as” that kind of guy” with no means to practice their inherent flexibility. This behavior lowers variety, reinforces stereotypes, and doesn’t reveal reality.

    Personas rely on people, not the environment

    You’re designing for a perspective, not an individual, in the real world. Each individual lives in a community, a group, an habitat, where there are environmental, social, and cultural factors you need to consider. A pattern is not meant for a single customer. Instead, you create a style for one or more specific situations where a large number of individuals may use that product. Personas, but, show the customer alone rather than explain how the consumer relates to the environment.

    Would you choose the exact course of action over and over again? Maybe you’re a dedicated vegan but also decide to buy some meats when your family are coming across. As they depend on various situations and characteristics, your decisions—and behavior, thoughts, and comments —are no absolute but extremely contextual. Because it doesn’t explain the grounds for your decisions, the persona that “represents” you doesn’t take into account this interdependence. It doesn’t provide a explanation of why you act the way you do. People practice the well-known attribution error, which states that they too often attribute others ‘ behavior to their personalities and not to the circumstances.

    As mentioned by the Interaction Design Foundation, identities are often placed in a situation that’s a” specific environment with a problem they want to or have to solve “—does that mean environment actually is considered? However, what frequently happens is that you take a hypothetical figure and based on that literature decide how this figure may deal with a particular situation. How could you possibly understand how someone you want to represent behave in new circumstances if you hadn’t even fully investigated and understood the current context of the people you want to represent?

    Personas are meaningless averages

    A persona is depicted as a specific person but is not a real person, as stated in Shlomo Goltz’s introduction article on Smashing Magazine; rather, it is made up of observations from numerous people. A well-known critique to this aspect of personas is that the average person does not exist, as per the famous example of the USA Air Force designing planes based on the average of 140 of their pilots ‘ physical dimensions and not a single pilot actually fitting within that average seat.

    The same limitation applies to mental aspects of people. Have you ever heard a famous person say something was taken out of context? They used my words, but I didn’t mean it like that”. The celebrity’s statement was literally reported, but the reporter failed to explain the context and how the non-verbal expressions were used. As a result, the intended meaning was lost. You do the same when you create personas: you collect somebody’s statement ( or goal, or need, or emotion ), of which the meaning can only be understood if you provide its own specific context, yet report it as an isolated finding.

    However, personas go a step further, combining a decontextualized finding with another decontextualized finding from someone else. The resulting set of findings often does not make sense: it’s unclear, or even contrasting, because it lacks the underlying reasons on why and how that finding has arisen. It lacks any significance. And the persona doesn’t give you the full background of the person ( s ) to uncover this meaning: you would need to dive into the raw data for each single persona item to find it. What, then, is the usefulness of the persona?

    The validity of personas is deceiving.

    To a certain extent, designers realize that a persona is a lifeless average. Designers create “relatable” personas to make them appear like real people in order to overcome this. Nothing captures the absurdity of this better than a sentence by the Interaction Design Foundation:” Add a few fictional personal details to make the persona a realistic character”. In other words, you add non-realism in an attempt to create more realism. Wouldn’t it be much more responsible to emphasize that John is only an abstraction while deliberately obscuring the fact that” John Doe” is an abstract representation of research findings? If something is artificial, let’s present it as such.

    After accepting that people’s personalities are fixed, dismissed the importance of their environment, and hidden meaning by joining isolated, non-generalizable findings, designers create new context to create ( their own ) meaning. In doing so, as with everything they create, they introduce a host of biases. As phrased by Designit, as designers we can” contextualize]the persona ] based on our reality and experience. We make connections that are well-known to us. This practice reinforces stereotypes, doesn’t reflect real-world diversity, and gets further away from people’s actual reality with every detail added.

    To conduct effective design research, we must report the “as-is” reality and make it relatable for our audience so that everyone can use their own empathy and formula for their own interpretation and emotional response.

    Dynamic Selves: The alternative to personas

    If we shouldn’t use personas, what should we do instead?

    Designit suggested utilizing mindsets rather than personas. Each Mindset is a” spectrum of attitudes and emotional responses that different people have within the same context or life experience”. It challenges designers to avoid getting fixated on just one person’s way of being. Unfortunately, while being a step in the right direction, this proposal doesn’t take into account that people are part of an environment that determines their personality, their behavior, and, yes, their mindset. Therefore, Mindsets are also not absolute but change in regard to the situation. What determines a certain Mindset, remains to be seen.

    Another alternative comes from Margaret P., author of the article” Kill Your Personas“, who has argued for replacing personas with persona spectrums that consist of a range of user abilities. For instance, a visual impairment could be permanent ( blindness ), temporary ( recovery from eye surgery ), or situational (screen glare ). Persona spectrums are highly useful for more inclusive and context-based design, as they’re based on the understanding that the context is the pattern, not the personality. Their limitation, however, is that they have a very functional take on users that misses the relatability of a real person taken from within a spectrum.

    We want to change the traditional design process to be context-based by creating a persona substitute. Contexts are generalizable and have patterns that we can identify, just like we tried to do previously with people. How can we identify these patterns, then? How do we ensure truly context-based design?

    Understand real individuals in multiple contexts

    Nothing can be more relatable and inspiring than reality. Therefore, we have to understand real individuals in their multi-faceted contexts, and use this understanding to fuel our design. We refer to this method as Dynamic Selves.

    Let’s take a look at what the approach looks like, based on an example of how one of us applied it in a recent project that researched habits of Italians around energy consumption. We drafted a design research plan aimed at investigating people’s attitudes toward energy consumption and sustainable behavior, with a focus on smart thermostats.

    1. Choose the right sample

    We frequently get slammed for saying,” Where are you going to find a single person that encapsulates all the information from one of these advanced personas ]” when we debate personas. The answer is simple: you don’t have to. You don’t need to have information about many people for your insights to be deep and meaningful.

    In qualitative research, accuracy comes from accurate sampling rather than quantity. You select the people that best represent the “population” you’re designing for. You can infer how the rest of the population thinks and acts if this sample is chosen wisely and you have a deep understanding of the sampled people. There’s no need to study seven Susans and five Yuriys, one of each will do.

    Similarly, you don’t need to understand Susan in fifteen different contexts. Once you’ve seen her in a few different settings, you’ve come to understand how Susan responds to various circumstances. Not Susan as an atomic being but Susan in relation to the surrounding environment: how she might act, feel, and think in different situations.

    It becomes clear why each person should be portrayed as an individual because each already represents an abstraction of a larger group of people in similar circumstances because each person is representative of a portion of the population you’re researching. You don’t want abstractions of abstractions! These selected people need to be understood and shown in their full expression, remaining in their microcosmos—and if you want to identify patterns you can focus on identifying patterns in contexts.

    However, the question remains: how do you select a sample representative? First of all, you have to consider what’s the target audience of the product or service you are designing: it might be useful to look at the company’s goals and strategy, the current customer base, and/or a possible future target audience.

    We were creating an application for those who already have a smart thermostat in our example project. In the future, everyone could have a smart thermostat in their house. Right now, though, only early adopters own one. We needed to understand the reason behind these early adopters in order to build a significant sample. We therefore recruited by asking people why they had a smart thermostat and how they got it. There were those who had chosen to purchase it, those who had been influenced by others, and those who had discovered it in their homes. So we selected representatives of these three situations, from different age groups and geographical locations, with an equal balance of tech savvy and non-tech savvy participants.

    2. Conduct your research

    After having chosen and recruited your sample, conduct your research using ethnographic methodologies. This will give you more examples and anecdotes to enrich your qualitative data. In our example project, given COVID-19 restrictions, we converted an in-house ethnographic research effort into remote family interviews, conducted from home and accompanied by diary studies.

    To gain an in-depth understanding of attitudes and decision-making trade-offs, the research focus was not limited to the interviewee alone but deliberately included the whole family. Each interviewee would provide a story that would then become much more interesting and precise with the additions made by their spouses, husbands, kids, or occasionally even pets. We also focused on the relationships with other meaningful people ( such as colleagues or distant family ) and all the behaviors that resulted from those relationships. This extensive field of study gave us the ability to create a vivid mental image of dynamic situations involving multiple actors.

    It’s essential that the scope of the research remains broad enough to be able to include all possible actors. Therefore, it normally works best to define broad research areas with macro questions. Interviews should be conducted in a semi-structured manner, with follow-up questions delve into subjects that the interviewee has blatantly mentioned. This open-minded “plan to be surprised” will yield the most insightful findings. One of our participants responded,” My wife has not installed the thermostat’s app; she uses WhatsApp instead,” when we asked how his family controlled the house temperature. If she wants to turn on the heater and she is not home, she will text me. I am her thermostat”.

    3. Analysis: Create the Dynamic Selves

    You begin to represent each individual as a series of dynamic selves during the research analysis, each” Self” representing a particular context. The core of each Dynamic Self is a quote, which comes supported by a photo and a few relevant demographics that illustrate the wider context. The research findings themselves will show which demographics are relevant to show. The important demographics were family type, number and type of houses owned, economic status, and technological maturity in our case because our research focused on families and their way of life to understand their needs for thermal regulation. ( We also included the individual’s name and age, but they’re optional—we included them to ease the stakeholders ‘ transition from personas and be able to connect multiple actions and contexts to the same person ).

    Interviews and notes must be recorded verbatim as much as possible in order to capture precise quotes. This is essential to the truthfulness of the several Selves of each participant. In the case of real-life ethnographic research, photos of the context and anonymized actors are essential to build realistic Selves. These photos should be taken directly from field research, but an evocative and representative image will do as well as that, as long as it’s accurate and depicts meaningful actions that you associate with your participants. For example, one of our interviewees told us about his mountain home where he used to spend every weekend with his family. We depicted him hiking with his young daughter as a result.

    At the end of the research analysis, we displayed all of the Selves ‘” cards” on a single canvas, categorized by activities. Each card displayed a situation, represented by a quote and a unique photo. Each participant had several cards about themselves.

    4. Identify creative uses

    Once you have collected all main quotes from the interview transcripts and diaries, and laid them all down as Self cards, you will see patterns emerge. These patterns will highlight the opportunity areas for new product creation, new functionalities, and new services—for new design.

    There was a particularly intriguing insight around the concept of humidity in our example project. We realized that people don’t know what humidity is and why it is important to monitor it for health: an environment that’s too dry or too wet can cause respiratory problems or worsen existing ones. This made clear that our client had a significant opportunity to train users about the concept and work as a health advisor.

    Benefits of Dynamic Selves

    When you use the Dynamic Selves approach in your research, you start to notice unique social relations, peculiar situations real people face and the actions that follow, and that people are surrounded by changing environments. One of the participants in our thermostat project, Davide, is described as a boyfriend, dog lover, and tech nut.

    Davide is an individual we might have once reduced to a persona called “tech enthusiast”. However, there are also those who love technology who have families or are single, who are wealthy or poor. Their motivations and priorities when deciding to purchase a new thermostat can be opposite according to these different frames.

    Once you have understood Davide in multiple situations, and for each situation have understood in sufficient depth the underlying reasons for his behavior, you’re able to generalize how he would act in another situation. You can use your understanding of him to predict what he would think and act in the situations ( or scenarios ) you create.

    The Dynamic Selves approach aims to dismiss the conflicted dual purpose of personas—to summarize and empathize at the same time—by separating your research summary from the people you’re seeking to empathize with. This is crucial because scale affects how we feel about people and how difficult it is to feel empathy for others. We feel the strongest empathy for individuals we can personally relate to.

    If you take a real person as inspiration for your design, you no longer need to create an artificial character. No more creating new plot devices to “realize” the character, no more implausible bias. It’s simply how this person is in real life. In fact, as we all know, personas quickly turn into nothing more than a name in our priority guides and prototype screens because these characters don’t really exist.

    Another powerful benefit of the Dynamic Selves approach is that it raises the stakes of your work: if you mess up your design, someone real, a person you and the team know and have met, is going to feel the consequences. It might stop you from taking shortcuts and will remind you to conduct daily checks on your designs.

    Finally, real people in their specific contexts provide a better foundation for anecdotal storytelling and are thus more effective at persuasion. Documentation of real research is essential in achieving this result. The circumstances of your design proposals resound in your mind when you encounter Alessandra. Noise, bad ergonomics, lack of light, you name it. If we go for this functionality, I’m afraid we’re going to add complexity to her life”.

    Conclusion

    In their article on Mindsets, Designit mentioned that “design thinking tools offer a shortcut to deal with reality’s complexities, but this process of simplification can occasionally flatten out people’s lives into a few general characteristics.” Unfortunately, personas have been culprits in a crime of oversimplification. They fail to account for the complex nature of our users ‘ decision-making processes and don’t take into account the fact that people are immersed in contexts.

    Design needs simplification but not generalization. You have to look at the research elements that stand out: the sentences that captured your attention, the images that struck you, the sounds that linger. Use those to characterize the person in all of their contexts, and portray them. Both insights and people come with a context, they cannot be cut from that context because it would remove meaning.

    Design needs to shift away from fiction and embrace reality as our guide and inspiration in its messy, surprising, and unquantifiable beauty.

  • That’s Not My Burnout

    That’s Not My Burnout

    Are you like me when I read about people who fade away as they age and who don’t have any sense of connection? Do you feel like your feelings are invisible to the earth because you’re experiencing burnout different? Our main comes through more when stress starts to press down on us. Beautiful, quiet souls get softer and dissipate into that remote and distracted fatigue we’ve all read about. But some of us, those with fires constantly burning on the sides of our key, getting hotter. I have hearth in my brain. When I face fatigue I twice over, triple down, burning hotter and hotter to try to best the issue. I don’t fade; I’m consumed by passionate fatigue.

    But what on earth is a passionate burnout?

    Envision a person determined to do it all. She is homeschooling two wonderful children while her husband, who is also working mildly, is likewise homeschooling. She has a demanding customer fill at work—all of whom she loves. She wakes up early to get some movement in ( or frequently catch up on work ), prepares dinner while the kids are having breakfast, and works while positioning herself near the end of her “fourth grade” to watch as she balances clients, tasks, and budgets. Sound like a bit? Also with a supportive group both at home and at work, it is.

    Sounds like this person needs self-care because she has too much on her disk. But no, she doesn’t have occasion for that. She begins to feel as though she’s dropping balloons. Never accomplishing much. There’s not enough of her to be here and that, she is trying to divide her head in two all the time, all day, every day. She begins to question herself. And as those thoughts creep in more and more, her domestic tale becomes more and more important.

    She immediately KNOWS what she must do! She really Would MORE.

    This is a challenging and dangerous period. Know the reasons. Because when she doesn’t end that new purpose, that storyline will get worse. She immediately starts failing. She isn’t doing much. SHE is not enough. She may fail, she might refuse her family, but she’ll discover more to do. She doesn’t nap as much, proceed because much, all in the attempts to do more. caught in this pattern of attempting to prove herself to herself without ever succeeding. Always feeling “enough”.

    But, yeah, that’s what zealous burnout looks like for me. It doesn’t develop immediately in a magnificent sign; it develops gradually over the course of several weeks and months. My burning out procedure looks like speeding up, not a man losing focus. I move quickly and steadily, and then I simply quit.

    I am the one who had

    It’s interesting the things that shape us. Through the camera of my youth, I witnessed the battles, sacrifices, and fears of a person who had to make it all work without having much. I was happy that my mom was so competent and my dad sympathetic, I never went without and also got an extra here or there.

    Growing up, I didn’t feel shame when my mom gave me food postcards; in fact, I would have likely sparked debates about the subject, orally eviscerating anyone who dared to criticize the disabled person who was attempting to ensure all of our needs were met with so little. As a child, I watched the way the worry of not making those begins meet impacted people I love. As the non-disabled people in my home, I did take on many of the real things because I was” the one who was” make our lives a little easier. I soon realized that I had to put more of myself into it because I am the one who is. I learned first that when something frightens me, I can double down and work harder to make it better. I am capable of taking on the issue. When individuals have seen this in me as an adult, I’ve been told I seem courageous, but make no mistake, I’m not. If I seem courageous, it’s because this behavior was forged from another person’s fears.

    And here I am, more than 30 years later, also feeling the urge to aimlessly force myself forward when faced with daunting tasks in front of me, assuming that I am the one who is and consequently does. I find myself driven to prove that I may make things happen if I work longer hours, taking on more responsibility, and do more.

    Because I have seen how powerful a economically challenged person can be, I do not see people who struggle economically as problems because they are pulled along the way. I really get that I have been privileged to be able to prevent many of the issues that were current in my children. That said, I am still” the one who can” who feels she should, so if I were faced with not having enough to make ends meet for my own family, I would see myself as having failed. Despite my best efforts and education, the majority of this is due to good fortune. I will, however, allow myself the arrogance of saying I have been careful with my choices to have encouraged that luck. My sense of self is the result of the notion that I am” the one who can” and feel compelled to accomplish the most. I can choose to stop, and with some quite literal cold water splashed in my face, I’ve made the choice to before. But that choosing to stop is not my go-to, I move forward, driven by a fear that is so a part of me that I barely notice it’s there until I’m feeling utterly worn away.

    So why all the history? You see, burnout is a fickle thing. Over the years, I have read and heard a lot about burnout. Burnout is real. Especially now, with COVID, many of us are balancing more than we ever have before—all at once! It’s difficult, and the avoidance, shutting down, and procrastination have an impact on so many amazing professionals. There are important articles that relate to what I imagine must be the majority of people out there, but not me. Not at the time of my burnout, though.

    The dangerous invisibility of zealous burnout

    A lot of work environments see the extra hours, extra effort, and overall focused commitment as an asset ( and sometimes that’s all it is ). They see someone attempting to overcome obstacles, not a person who is ensnared in fear. Many well-meaning organizations have safeguards in place to protect their teams from burnout. However, in situations like this, those alarms don’t always ring, and some organization members are surprised and depressed when the inevitable stop happens. And sometimes maybe even betrayed.

    Parents—more so mothers, statistically speaking—are praised as being so on top of it all when they can work, be involved in the after-school activities, practice self-care in the form of diet and exercise, and still meet friends for coffee or wine. Many of us have watched countless streaming COVID episodes to see how challenging it is for the female protagonist, but she is strong and funny and can do it. It’s a “very special episode” when she breaks down, cries in the bathroom, woefully admits she needs help, and just stops for a bit. Truth be told, countless people are hidden in tears or doom-scrolling to escape. We know that the media is a lie to amuse us, but often the perception that it’s what we should strive for has penetrated much of society.

    Women and burnout

    I cherish men. And though I don’t love every man ( heads up, I don’t love every woman or nonbinary person either ), I think there is a beautiful spectrum of individuals who represent that particular binary gender.

    Despite this, especially in these COVID stressed out times, women are still more likely than their male counterparts to be burnout vulnerable. Mothers in the workplace feel the pressure to do all the “mom” things while giving 110 %. Mothers not in the workplace feel they need to do more to” justify” their lack of traditional employment. Women who are not mothers frequently feel the need to work even more because they aren’t under that much pressure at home. It’s vicious and systemic and so a part of our culture that we’re often not even aware of the enormity of the pressures we put on ourselves and each other.

    And there are costs that go beyond happiness. Harvard Health Publishing released a study a decade ago that “uncovered strong links between women’s job stress and cardiovascular disease”. The CDC noted,” Heart disease is the leading cause of death for women in the United States, killing 299, 578 women in 2017—or about 1 in every 5 female deaths”.

    According to what I’ve read, this connection between work stress and health is more dangerous for women than it is for their non-female counterparts.

    But what if your burnout isn’t like that either?

    You might not be the same as that. After all, each of us is so different and how we respond to stressors is too. It’s part of what makes us human. Don’t put too much emphasis on how burnout manifests; rather, learn to recognize it in yourself. Here are a few questions I sometimes ask friends if I am concerned about them.

    Are you content? This simple question should be the first thing you ask yourself. Chances are, even if you’re burning out doing all the things you love, as you approach burnout you’ll just stop taking as much joy from it all.

    Do you feel like you have the authority to decline? I have observed in myself and others that when someone is burning out, they no longer feel they can say no to things. Even those who don’t” speed up” feel pressured to say “yes” and not let the people around them be disappointed.

    What are three things you’ve done for yourself? Another observance is that we all tend to stop doing things for ourselves. anything from avoiding conversations with friends to skipping showers and eating poorly. These can be red flags.

    Are you using justifications? Many of us try to disregard feelings of burnout. Over and over I have heard,” It’s just crunch time”,” As soon as I do this one thing, it will all be better”, and” Well I should be able to handle this, so I’ll figure it out”. And it could be just one more thing you need to learn, or it might just be crunch time. That happens—life happens. Be open to yourself if this continues to happen. If you’ve worked more 50-hour weeks since January than not, maybe it’s not crunch time—maybe it’s a bad situation that you’re burning out from.

    Do you have a plan to stop feeling this way? If something has an exit route with a pause button if it is truly temporary and you do need to simply push through, it does.
    defined end.

    Take the time to listen to your friend in the same way. Be honest, allow yourself to be uncomfortable, and break the thought cycles that prevent you from healing.

    So now what?

    What I just described has a different path to burnout, but it’s still burnout. There are well-established approaches to working through burnout:

    • Get enough sleep.
    • Eat healthy.
    • Work out.
    • Go outside.
    • Take a break.
    • Practice self-care in general.

    Those are hard for me because they feel like more tasks. If I’m in the burnout cycle, doing any of the above for me feels like a waste. Why would I take care of myself when I’m dropping all those other balls, according to the narrative? People need me, right?

    Your inner voice might be pretty bad by now if you’re deeply in the cycle. If you need to, tell yourself you need to take care of the person your people depend on. If your roles are pushing you toward burnout, use them to help make healing easier by justifying the time spent working on you.

    I have come up with a few suggestions for me to help me remember the airline attendant’s advice to put on your face first when I feel burned out.

    Cook an elaborate meal for someone!

    Okay, since I’m a “food-focused” person, I’ve always been a fan. There are countless tales in my home of someone walking into the kitchen and turning right around and walking out when they noticed I was” chopping angrily”. But it’s more than that, and you should give it a try. Seriously. It’s the perfect go-to if you don’t feel worthy of taking time for yourself—do it for someone else. Because the majority of us work in a digital world, cooking can pique all of your senses and make you immerse in the moment in all your ways of seeing the world. It can break you out of your head and help you gain a better perspective. In my house, I’ve been known to pick a place on the map and cook food that comes from wherever that is ( thank you, Pinterest ). I enjoy making Indian food because the smells are warm, the bread needs just enough kneading to keep my hands engaged, and the process requires real attention for me because it’s not what I was raised making. And in the end, we all win!

    Vent like a sniveling jerk.

    Be careful with this one!

    I have been making an effort to practice more gratitude over the past few years, and I recognize the true benefits of that. Having said that, sometimes you just need to let it all out, even the ugly ones. Hell, I’m a big fan of not sugarcoating our lives, and that sometimes means that to get past the big pile of poop, you’re gonna wanna complain about it a bit.

    When that is required, turn to a trusted friend and give yourself some pure verbal diarrhea, yelling at you all the way through. You need to trust this friend not to judge, to see your pain, and, most importantly, to tell you to remove your cranium from your own rectal cavity. Seriously, it’s about getting a reality check here! One of the things that I admire most about my husband is how he can simplify things down to the simplest of terms, even though sometimes after the fact. ” We’re spending our lives together, of course you’re going to disappoint me from time to time, so get over it” has been his way of speaking his dedication, love, and acceptance of me—and I could not be more grateful. Of course, it also required that I take my head out of that rectal cavity. So, again, usually those moments are appreciated in hindsight.

    Pick up a book!

    There are many books out there that are more like you sharing their stories and how they’ve come to find greater balance than they are self-help. Maybe you’ll find something that speaks to you. Among the titles that have stood out to me are:

    • Thrive by Arianna Huffington
    • Tools of Titans by Tim Ferriss
    • Girl, Stop Apologizing by Rachel Hollis
    • Dare to Lead by Brené Brown

    Or, a tactic I enjoy using is to read or listen to a book that is NOT related to my work-life balance. I’ve read the following books and found they helped balance me out because my mind was pondering their interesting topics instead of running in circles:

    • The Drunken Botanist by Amy Stewart
    • Darin Olien’s Superlife
    • A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived by Adam Rutherford
    • Toby Hemenway’s Gaia’s Garden is available.

    If you’re not into reading, pick up a topic on YouTube or choose a podcast to subscribe to. I’ve watched countless permaculture and gardening topics in addition to how to raise chickens and ducks. For the record, I don’t currently have a particularly large food garden or raise any kind of livestock. I just find the topic interesting, and it has nothing to do with any aspect of my life that needs anything from me.

    Give yourself a break.

    You are never going to be perfect—hell, it would be boring if you were. It’s OK to be broken and flawed. Being tired, depressed, and worried is human nature. It’s OK to not do it all. Although being imperfect is terrifying, you cannot be brave without being fearful.

    This last one is the most important: allow yourself permission to NOT do it all. You never promised to be everything to everyone at all times. We are stronger than the anxieties that motivate us.

    This is hard. I struggle with it. It’s what’s driven me to write this—that it’s OK to stop. It’s OK that your unhealthy habit that might even benefit those around you needs to end. You can continue to succeed in life.

    I recently read that we are all writing our eulogy in how we live. What will your professional accomplishments say, knowing that yours won’t be mentioned in that speech? What do you want it to say?

    Look, I get that none of these ideas will “fix it”, and that’s not their purpose. Only how we react to the things around us is what we control. These suggestions are to help stop the spiral effect so that you are empowered to address the underlying issues and choose your response. They are things that most of the time work for me. Maybe they’ll work for you.

    Does this sound familiar?

    If this sounds familiar, you’re not just going to know about it. Don’t let your negative self-talk tell you that you “even burn out wrong”. It’s not improper. Even if rooted in fear like my own drivers, I believe that this need to do more comes from a place of love, determination, motivation, and other wonderful attributes that make you the amazing person you are. We’re going to be OK, ya know. The lives that come before us might never appear to be the same as the one we’re picturing, or that we’re looking for, but that’s okay because the only way to judge us is in the mirror when we stop and look around.

    Do you remember that Winnie the Pooh sketch that had Pooh eat so much at Rabbit’s house that his buttocks couldn’t fit through the door? It came as no surprise when Rabbit abruptly declared that this was unacceptable because I already associate a lot with him. But do you recall what happened next? He put a shelf across poor Pooh’s ankles and decorations on his back, and made the best of the big butt in his kitchen.

    We are resourceful and aware that we can push ourselves when necessary, even when we are exhausted or have a ton of clutter in our room. None of us has to be afraid, as we can manage any obstacle put in front of us. And maybe that means we need to redefine success in order to make room for comfort for being uncomfortable human, but that doesn’t really sound that bad either.

    So, wherever you are right now, please breathe. Do what you need to do to get out of your head. Give thanks and take precaution.