Blog

On June 27, Netflix’s hit line Squid Game will release its third and final season on the streaming services. Gi-hun ( Lee Jung-jae ), who lost his best friend and many others to another round of the game, must find a new strategy to defeat them all at once while preserving both himself and the others alive.

On Den of Geek, the second article Netflix New Releases: June 2025 appeared.

Writer-director Rian Johnson and his glittering solid, led by a genteel Daniel Craig, had joy hiding what the next Knives Out mystery is about for the majority of the introduction to the Wake Up Dying Man segment of Saturday night’s Netflix Tudum event. In reality, we really don’t understand. However, the movie’s first trailer truck indicates that it is going for a more horizontal and darker voice than the standard humor that viewers remember from Knives Out and Glass Onion, including marketing.

A church bell dangerously sounds in the distance in the teaser as nighttime rains and shadows pour down on Craig’s surprisingly unflappable Benoit Blanc. Blanc bluntly intones during the truck for” The unthinkable crime,” without a lovely witticism or visible gag in sight. This is the Holy Grail, in the eyes of a man of reason. A haunting song acts as an melancholy and Southern tone cries,” O Death, O Death ,Won’t you spare me over til another time,” throughout the entire thing.

The music selection may reveal a bit about the movie’s setting and potential dark places it intends to go, but we still know a little bit about the story of Wake Up Deceased Person beyond its fantastic ensemble, which includes Glenn Close, Kerry Washington, Jeremy Renner, Josh Brolin, Andrew Scott, and Cailee Spaeny.

Initial rumors about the third Knives Out film’s location were based on the country where the majority of the film &#8217 ;s production took place. Even though that might still be the case, we suspect that the English land might be used in place of something more American-centric and distinctively Southern. In fact, many followers of the Coen Brothers are likely to recall the song” O, Death” from the video because it was Ralph Stanley’s own rendition of the song sung by the late music artist in Joel and Ethan Coen’s O Brother, Where Art Thou? ( 2000 ).

Stanley, it should be noted, is a story in the music and traditions sound of music who won a Grammy for this adaptation of &#8220, O Death. His vocals, however, were used in O Brother ( and now Wake Up Dead Man ) to scream chills out when sung a cappella in the third act of the Coens ‘ Mississippi-set Depression fable. After all, the film is being sung by the mastermind behind a Ku Klux Klan book, which has assembled to murder and murder a young Black man on a trumped-up accusation based in belief, rather than by a simple musician.

This music was definitely not chosen by The Coens to been sung by the KKK in the 1930s, which is also likely not to have been an accident. The album’s standard origin story is that it was originally written by Baptist pastor Lloyd Chandler and is a traditional Eastern folk song. In fact, Chandler performed the song in North Carolina in the 1920s, supposedly as a result of a perception from God of the track in 1916. However, further investigation has established that Chandler’s structure shares a strange resemblance with a 1913 printed edition of a folk music ( which is likely much older ) from Journal of American Folklore. The book claimed that” Eastern North Carolina Negroes” were the snobs of the music.

Which is all, the album’s confusing source is largely due to the tensions and social environment of the American South during the Jim Crow era and the Civil War. The Coens used it as a depressing song of death for the mass killing whites, and it is now being used to indicate what appears to be the first Benoit Blanc unknown to return to Benoit’s ancestral homeland, the American South. One of the film’s law enforcement figures is dressed like someone from an American sheriff’s office, as opposed to an English village, which adds to this setting.

Although all of this speculation is true, Johnson probably made a conscious decision to use this song and Stanley’s Grammy-winning version of it. We are left to wonder how deeply Southern the roots of Johnson’s third murder mystery will be given how unafraid to use what appear to be cozy murder mysteries to probe deeper issues of social rot and inequality in the modern world through both Glass Onion and Knives Out.

Netflix’s Wake Up Dead Man season premieres on December 12.

The first post Haunting Song in the Wake Up Dead Man Trailer Ties to Coen Brothers and Grim Southern History appeared on Den of Geek.

On June 25, FX’s The Bear makes its third year a home on Hulu. This season will again put Carmy ( Jeremy Allen White ), Sydney ( Ayo Edebiri), and the rest of the Bear crew to the test as they try to push their restaurant and each other to be the best they can be. The first Docuseries, Call Her]…

On Den of Geek, the second post Hulu New Releases: June 2025 appeared.

Writer-director Rian Johnson and his glittering solid, led by a genteel Daniel Craig, had joy hiding what the next Knives Out mystery is about for the majority of the introduction to the Wake Up Dying Man segment of Saturday night’s Netflix Tudum event. In reality, we really don’t understand. However, as per the second movie trailer video, it is going for a more horizontal and darker voice than the standard playfulness that viewers remember from Knives Out and Glass Onion, both commercially and personally.

In the preview, a chapel bell dangerously sounds in the range as images drenched in shadow and daytime rains cascade down around Craig’s unanticipatedly philosophical Benoit Blanc. Blanc bluntly intones during the truck for” The unthinkable crime. Without a lovely witticism or visible gag in sight. This is the Holy Grail, in the eyes of a man of reason. A haunting song acts as an melancholy and Southern tone cries,” O Death, O Death ,Won’t you spare me over til another time,” throughout the entire thing.

The music selection may reveal a bit about the movie’s building and, perhaps, the dark places it intends to go, but we still know a little bit about the story of Wake Up Dying Man beyond its fantastic ensemble, which includes Glenn Close, Kerry Washington, Jeremy Renner, Josh Brolin, Andrew Scott, and Cailee Spaeny.

The third Knives Out film was initially thought to be set in England, where the majority of the movie’s production took place, according to initial rumors. We suspect that the English countryside might be used in place of something more American-centric and distinctively Southern in the future. In fact, many fans of the Coen Brothers are likely to recall the song” O, Death” from the trailer because it was Ralph Stanley’s own rendition of the song sung by the late bluegrass artist in Joel and Ethan Coen’s O Brother, Where Art Thou? ( 2000 ).

Stanley, it should be noted, is a legend in the bluegrass and folk music industry who won a Grammy for this rendition of &#8220, O Death. His vocals, however, were used in O Brother ( and now Wake Up Dead Man ) to scream chills out when sung cappella in the third act of the Depression fable by Coens ‘ Mississippi-set depression. After all, the film is being sung by the mastermind behind a Ku Klux Klan chapter, which has assembled to lynch and murder a young Black man on a trumped-up accusation based in superstition, rather than by a simple musician.

This song’s inclusion by The Coens as sung by the KKK in the 1930s is probably not an accident either. The song’s traditional origin story, which was written by Baptist preacher Lloyd Chandler, is known as” the Appalachian folk song.” Chandler undoubtedly performed the song in North Carolina in the 1920s, allegedly as a result of a vision from God of the song in 1916. However, further investigation has established that Chandler’s composition shares a strange similarity with a 1913 printed version of a folk song ( which is likely much older ) from Journal of American Folklore. The journal claimed that” Eastern North Carolina Negroes” were the snobs of the song.

Which is all, the song’s ambiguous origin is rooted in the tensions and cultural milieu of the American South during the days and decades of Jim Crow and after the Civil War. The Coens used it as a depressingly beautiful song of annihilation to address the mass murdering racists, and it is now being used to imply what appears to be the first Benoit Blanc mystery to return to the American South, a region of Benoit’s birthplace. ( The fact that one of the film’s law enforcement figures is dressed like someone from an American sheriff’s office as opposed to an English village confirms this setting even further. )

Although all of this speculation is true, Johnson’s decision to use this song and Stanley’s Grammy-winning version of it in particular is probably one he made. We are left to wonder how deeply Southern the roots of Johnson’s third murder mystery will be given how unflinchingly use what appear to be cozy murder mysteries to probe deeper issues of inequality and social decay in the modern world through both Glass Onion and Knives Out.

Wake Up Dead Man airs on Netflix on December 12.

The first post on Den of Geek: Wake Up Dead Man Trailer Ties to Coen Brothers and Grim Southern History.

There may not be many new Disney + releases this month, but there is still plenty to look forward to. With the first 10 episodes of season 5, Phineas and Ferb will return at the beginning of June ( 6 June ). This is the first time that new incidents have been released.

On Den of Geek, the first article Disney + New Releases: June 2025 appeared.

Writer-director Rian Johnson and his glittering solid, led by a genteel Daniel Craig, had joy hiding what the next Knives Out puzzle is about during the majority of the introduction to the Wake Up Dead Man portion of Saturday night’s Netflix Tudum event. We definitely don’t understand, in reality. However, the movie’s first trailer truck indicates that it is going for a more horizontal and darker voice than the standard humor that viewers remember from Knives Out and Glass Onion, including marketing.

A church bell dangerously sounds in the distance in the teaser as nighttime rains and shadows pour down on Craig’s unexpectedly unflappable Benoit Blanc. Blanc blatantly utters during the trailer for” The unattainable crime,” without any endearing wit or visual joke. This is the Holy Grail, in the eyes of a man of reason. A haunting song is played as an melancholy and Southern tone cries,” O Death, O Death ,Won’t you extra me over til another time,” throughout the entire thing.

The music selection may reveal a bit about the movie’s setting and potential dark places it intends to go, but we still know a little bit about the story of Wake Up Deceased Person beyond its fantastic ensemble, which includes Glenn Close, Kerry Washington, Jeremy Renner, Josh Brolin, Andrew Scott, and Cailee Spaeny.

The second Knives Out film was initially thought to be set in England, where the majority of the movie’s creation took place, according to initial rumors. Even so, we believe the English land might be used in place of something more American-centric and distinctively Southwestern for viewers. In fact, many Coen Brothers fans are likely familiar with the song” O, Death” from the video because it was Ralph Stanley’s own rendition of the song sung by the late music artist in Joel and Ethan Coen’s O Brother, Where Art Thou? ( 2000 ).

Stanley, it should be noted, is a story in the grass and folk music industry who won an award for his rendition of &#8220, O Death. His vocals, however, were used in O Brother ( and now Wake Up Dead Man ) to scream chills out when sung cappella in the third act of the Depression fable by Coens ‘ Mississippi-set depression. After all, the film is being sung by the mastermind behind a Ku Klux Klan book, which has assembled to murder and murder a young Black man on a trumped-up accusation based in belief, rather than by a simple musician.

This song’s inclusion by The Coens as sung by the KKK in the 1930s is probably not an accident sometimes. The song’s traditional origin story, which was written by Baptist preacher Lloyd Chandler, is known as” the old Appalachian folk song.” In fact, Chandler performed the song in North Carolina in the 1920s, supposedly as a result of a perception from God of the track in 1916. However, further investigation has established that Chandler’s structure shares a strange resemblance with a 1913 printed edition of a folk music ( which is likely much older ) from Journal of American Folklore. The book claimed that” Eastern North Carolina Negroes” were the snobs of the song.

Which is all, the album’s confusing nature is rooted in the tensions and social environment of the American South during the weeks and years of Jim Crow and after the Civil War. The Coens used it as a depressingly beautiful song of annihilation to address the mass murdering racists, and it is now being used to imply what appears to be the first Benoit Blanc mystery to return to the American South, a region of Benoit’s birthplace. ( One of the film’s law enforcement figures is dressed like someone from an American sheriff’s office as opposed to an English village, which further confirms this setting. )

Although all of this speculation is true, Johnson’s decision to use this song and Stanley’s Grammy-winning version of it in particular is likely to have been one. We are left to wonder how deeply Southern the roots of Johnson’s third murder mystery will be given how unflinchingly use what appear to be cozy murder mysteries to probe deeper issues of inequality and social decay in the modern world through both Glass Onion and Knives Out.

On December 12th, Wake Up Dead Man will be available on Netflix.

The first post Haunting Song in the Wake Up Dead Man Trailer Ties to Coen Brothers and Grim Southern History appeared on Den of Geek.

Clues appear in the Doctor Who season” The Reality War.” In the end, the Doctor must make a compromise in Doctor Who’s utterly mind-bending season finale against the two Ranis, Omega, Conrad, and a flock of skyscraper-sized bone species. back with steamers. It’s ]… ]

The Reality War, Episode 8 of Doc Who Series 15, was the first assessment on Den of Geek.

Writer-director Rian Johnson and his glittering solid, led by a genteel Daniel Craig, had joy hiding what the next Knives Out puzzle is about during the majority of the introduction to the Wake Up Dead Man portion of Saturday night’s Netflix Tudum event. We definitely don’t understand, in reality. However, the movie’s first trailer truck indicates that it is going for a more horizontal and darker voice than the standard humor that viewers remember from Knives Out and Glass Onion, including marketing.

In the preview, a church bell ring out in the distance as nighttime rains and shadows pour down on Craig’s quickly stoic Benoit Blanc. Blanc bluntly intones during the truck for” The unthinkable crime,” without a lovely witticism or visible gag in sight. This is the Holy Grail, in the eyes of a man of reason. A haunting song acts as an melancholy and Southern tone cries,” O Death, O Death ,Won’t you spare me over til another time.”

The music selection may reveal a bit about the movie’s setting and potential dark places it intends to go, but we still know a little bit about the story of Wake Up Deceased Person beyond its fantastic ensemble, which includes Glenn Close, Kerry Washington, Jeremy Renner, Josh Brolin, Andrew Scott, and Cailee Spaeny.

The second Knives Out film was initially thought to be set in England, where the majority of the movie’s creation took place, according to initial rumors. Even so, we believe the English countryside might be used in place of something more American-centric and distinctively Southwestern for viewers. In fact, some Coen Brothers fans will recall the music” O, Death” from the video because it was Ralph Stanley’s own rendition of” O Brother, Where Art Thou,” which was performed by Joel and Ethan Coen in the film’s opener. ( 2000 ).

Stanley, it should be noted, is a myth in the music and traditions sound of music who won a Grammy for this adaptation of &#8220, O Death. His vocals, however, were used in O Brother ( and now Wake Up Dead Man ) to scream a chill out the spine in the third act of the Coens ‘ Mississippi-set Depression fable. After all, the film is being sung by the mastermind behind a Ku Klux Klan book, which has assembled to murder and murder a young Black man on a trumped-up accusation based in belief, rather than by a simple musician.

This song’s inclusion by The Coens as a 1930s KKK anthem is probably not an accident both. The album’s conventional origin story is that it was originally written by Baptist pastor Lloyd Chandler and is a traditional Eastern folk song. In fact, Chandler performed the song in North Carolina in the 1920s, supposedly as a result of a perception from God of the track in 1916. However, further investigation has established that Chandler’s structure shares a strange resemblance with a 1913 printed edition of a folk music ( which is likely much older ) from Journal of American Folklore. The book claimed that” Eastern North Carolina Negroes” were the snobs of the music.

Which is all, the album’s confusing source is largely due to the tensions and social environment of the American South during the Jim Crow era and the Civil War. The Coens used it as a depressing song of death for the mass killing whites, and it is now being used to indicate what appears to be the first Benoit Blanc unknown to return to Benoit’s ancestral homeland, the American South. ( One of the film’s law enforcement figures is dressed like someone from an American sheriff’s office as opposed to an English village, which further confirms this setting. )

Although all of this speculation is true, Johnson’s decision to use this song and Stanley’s Grammy-winning version of it in particular is probably one he made. We are left to wonder how deeply Southern the roots of Johnson’s third murder mystery will be given how unflinchingly use what appear to be cozy murder mysteries to probe deeper issues of inequality and social decay in the modern world through both Glass Onion and Knives Out.

Wake Up Dead Man airs on Netflix on December 12.

The first post Haunting Song in the Wake Up Dead Man Trailer Ties to Coen Brothers and Grim Southern History appeared on Den of Geek.

The Gilded Age, an original HBO series, arrives for a second time on June 22. This line is based on a fictitious account from the Gilded Age of America. For those fortunate enough to capitalise on it, there is a time of rapidly growing wealth and market. People with ancient money are forced to adapt to New York City’s social scene.

On Den of Geek, the second article was HBO and Max New Releases: June 2025.

Writer-director Rian Johnson and his glittering solid, led by a genteel Daniel Craig, had joy hiding what the next Knives Out puzzle is about during the majority of the introduction to the Wake Up Dead Man portion of Saturday night’s Netflix Tudum event. In reality, we really don’t understand. However, the movie’s first trailer truck indicates that it is going for a more horizontal and darker voice than the standard humor that viewers remember from Knives Out and Glass Onion, including marketing.

In the preview, a chapel bell dangerously sounds in the range as images drenched in shadow and daytime rains cascade down around Craig’s unanticipatedly philosophical Benoit Blanc. Blanc blatantly utters during the trailer for” The unattainable crime,” without any endearing wit or visual joke. This is the Holy Grail, in the eyes of a man of reason. A haunting song acts as an melancholy and Southern tone cries,” O Death, O Death ,Won’t you spare me over til another time,” throughout the entire thing.

The music selection may reveal a bit about the movie’s environment and potential dark places it intends to go, but we still know a little bit about the story of Wake Up Deceased Person beyond its fantastic ensemble, which includes Glenn Close, Kerry Washington, Jeremy Renner, Josh Brolin, Andrew Scott, and Cailee Spaeny.

The next Knives Out film was initially thought to be set in England, where the majority of the movie’s production took place, according to initial rumors. Even so, we believe the English land might be used in place of something more American-centric and distinctively Southwestern for viewers. In fact, many followers of the Coen Brothers are likely to recall the song” O, Death” from the video because it was Ralph Stanley’s own rendition of the music sung by the late music artist in Joel and Ethan Coen’s O Brother, Where Art Thou? ( 2000 ).

Stanley, it should be noted, is a story in the grass and traditions sound of music who won a Grammy for this adaptation of &#8220, O Death. His vocals, however, were used in O Brother ( and now Wake Up Dead Man ) to scream a chill out the spine in the third act of the Coens ‘ Mississippi-set Depression fable. After all, the film is being sung by the great wizard of a Ku Klux Klan section, which has assembled to murder and death a young Black man on a trumped up accusation based in superstition, not by a basic musician.

This song’s inclusion by The Coens as a 1930s KKK anthem is probably not an accident both. The music’s standard origin story is that it was originally written by Baptist pastor Lloyd Chandler and is a traditional Eastern folk song. In fact, Chandler performed the song in North Carolina in the 1920s, supposedly as a result of a perception from God of the track in 1916. However, further investigation has established that Chandler’s structure shares a strange resemblance with a 1913 printed edition of a folk music ( which is likely much older ) from Journal of American Folklore. The book claimed that” Eastern North Carolina Negroes” were the sung the music.

Which is all, the album’s confusing source is largely due to the tensions and social environment of the American South during the Jim Crow era and the Civil War. The Coens used it as a depressingly beautiful song of death to address the large murdering racists, and it is now being used to imply what appears to be the first Benoit Blanc secret to return to the American South, a region that Benoit calls house. ( The fact that one of the film’s law enforcement figures is dressed like someone from an American sheriff’s office as opposed to an English village confirms this setting even further. )

Although all of this debate is true, Johnson’s decision to use this tune and Stanley’s Grammy-winning version of it in particular is probably one he made. We are left to wonder how profoundly Southern the origins of Johnson’s fourth murder mystery will be given how unflinchingly use what appear to be comfortable murder mysteries to probe deeper issues of inequality and social decay in the modern world through both Glass Onion and Knives Out.

Netflix’s Wake Up Dead Person season premieres on December 12.

On Den of Geek, a teaser for the Wake Up Deceased Person video features Coen Brothers and Grim Southern History’s Haunting Song.

Guillermo del Toro has long been known as the” light whale” of the post-Enlightenment novel Frankenstein, which was written by a young child and is based on modern science fiction. Since the 1990s, the Mexican director has been considering adapting Mary Shelley’s Prometheus account. And it’s almost these right then. The director and his supporters have a good time, but […]

The first post on Den of Geek was Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein Adapts Most Ignored ( and Scary ) Part of the Book.

Writer-director Rian Johnson and his glittering solid, led by a genteel Daniel Craig, had joy hiding what the next Knives Out puzzle is about during the majority of the introduction to the Wake Up Dead Man portion of Saturday night’s Netflix Tudum event. We definitely don’t understand, in reality. However, the movie’s first trailer truck indicates that it is going for a more horizontal and darker voice than the standard humor that viewers remember from Knives Out and Glass Onion, including marketing.

In the preview, a church bell ring out in the distance as nighttime rains and shadows pour down on Craig’s surprisingly stoic Benoit Blanc. Blanc bluntly intones during the truck for” The unthinkable crime,” without a lovely witticism or visible gag in sight. This is the Holy Grail, in the eyes of a rational person. A haunting song is played as an melancholy and Southern tone cries,” O Death, O Death ,Won’t you extra me over til another time,” throughout the entire thing.

The music selection may reveal a bit about the movie’s building and potential dark places it intends to go, despite the fact that we are only aware of its stellar ensemble, which includes Glenn Close, Kerry Washington, Jeremy Renner, Josh Brolin, Andrew Scott, and Cailee Spaeny.

The second Knives Out film was initially thought to be set in England, where the majority of the movie’s production took place, according to initial rumors. We suspect that the American land might be used in place of something more American-centric and distinctively Southern in the future. In fact, many followers of the Coen Brothers are likely to recall the song” O, Death” from the video because it was Ralph Stanley’s own rendition of the song sung by the late music artist in Joel and Ethan Coen’s O Brother, Where Art Thou? ( 2000 ).

Stanley, it should be noted, is a story in the grass and traditions sound of music who won a Grammy for this adaptation of &#8220, O Death. His vocals, however, were used in O Brother ( and now Wake Up Dead Man ) to scream a chill out the spine in the third act of the Coens ‘ Mississippi-set Depression fable. After all, a simple singer is playing the song on screen, which has assembled to murder and lynch a young Black man on a fabricated accusation based in superstition.

This music was definitely not chosen by The Coens to been sung by the KKK in the 1930s, which is also likely not to have been an accident. The song’s traditional origin story, which was written by Baptist preacher Lloyd Chandler, is known as” the old Appalachian folk song.” In fact, Chandler performed the song in North Carolina in the 1920s, supposedly as a result of a perception from God of the track in 1916. However, further investigation has established that Chandler’s structure shares a strange resemblance with a 1913 printed edition of a folk music ( which is likely much older ) from Journal of American Folklore. The book claimed that” Eastern North Carolina Negroes” were the snobs of the music.

Which is all, the album’s confusing nature is rooted in the tensions and social environment of the American South during the weeks and years of Jim Crow and after the Civil War. The Coens used it as a depressingly beautiful song of death to address the large murdering racists, and it is now being used to imply what appears to be the first Benoit Blanc secret to return to the American South, a region of Benoit’s birthplace. One of the show’s rules police numbers is dressed like someone from an American sheriff’s business, as opposed to an English community, which adds to this environment.

Although all of this debate is true, Johnson’s decision to use this tune and Stanley’s Grammy-winning version of it in particular is likely to have been one. We are left to wonder how profoundly Southern the origins of Johnson’s fourth murder mystery will be given how frightened to use what appear to be comfortable death mysteries to probe deeper issues of social perish and inequality in the modern world through both Glass Onion and Knives Out.

Wake Up Dying Guy airs on Netflix on December 12.

The first article on Den of Geek: Wake Up Dead Man Video Ties to Coen Brothers and Grim Southern History.

Writer-director Rian Johnson and his glittering solid, led by a genteel Daniel Craig, had joy hiding what the next Knives Out puzzle is about during the majority of the introduction to the Wake Up Dead Man portion of Saturday night’s Netflix Tudum event. In reality, we truly don’t know. However, as the first preview demonstrated, […]

The first article on Den of Geek: Wake Up Dead Man Video Ties to Coen Brothers and Grim Southern History.

Writer-director Rian Johnson and his glittering solid, led by a genteel Daniel Craig, had joy hiding what the next Knives Out puzzle is about during the majority of the introduction to the Wake Up Dead Man portion of Saturday night’s Netflix Tudum event. In reality, we truly don’t know. However, the movie’s first trailer truck indicates that it is going for a more horizontal and darker voice than the standard humor that viewers remember from Knives Out and Glass Onion, including marketing.

In the preview, a chapel bell dangerously sounds in the range as images drenched in shadow and daytime rains cascade down around Craig’s unanticipatedly philosophical Benoit Blanc. Blanc bluntly intones during the truck for” The unthinkable crime,” without a lovely witticism or visible gag in sight. This is the Holy Grail, in the eyes of a man of reason. A haunting song acts as an melancholy and Southern tone cries,” O Death, O Death ,Won’t you spare me over til another time.”

The song selection may reveal a lot about the movie’s setting and potential dark places it intends to go, but we still know a little bit about the plot of Wake Up Dead Man beyond its fantastic ensemble, which includes Glenn Close, Kerry Washington, Jeremy Renner, Josh Brolin, Andrew Scott, and Cailee Spaeny.

The third Knives Out film was initially thought to be set in England, where the majority of the movie’s production took place, according to initial rumors. We suspect that the English countryside might be used in place of something more American-centric and distinctively Southern in the future. In fact, many fans of the Coen Brothers are likely to recall the song” O, Death” from the trailer because it was Ralph Stanley’s own rendition of the song sung by the late bluegrass artist in Joel and Ethan Coen’s O Brother, Where Art Thou? ( 2000 ).

Stanley, it should be noted, is a legend in the bluegrass and folk music industry who won a Grammy for this rendition of &#8220, O Death. His vocals, however, were used in O Brother ( and now Wake Up Dead Man ) to scream a chill out the spine in the third act of the Coens ‘ Mississippi-set Depression fable. After all, the film is being sung by the mastermind behind a Ku Klux Klan chapter, which has assembled to lynch and murder a young Black man on a trumped-up accusation based in superstition, rather than by a simple musician.

This song’s inclusion by The Coens as sung by the KKK in the 1930s is probably not an accident either. The song’s traditional origin story, which was written by Baptist preacher Lloyd Chandler, is known as” the old Appalachian folk song.” In fact, Chandler performed the song in North Carolina in the 1920s, allegedly as a result of a vision that God had in 1916. However, further investigation has established that Chandler’s composition shares a strange similarity with a 1913 printed version of a folk song ( which is likely much older ) from Journal of American Folklore. The journal claimed that” Eastern North Carolina Negroes” were the snobs of the song.

Which is all, the song’s ambiguous origin is largely due to the tensions and cultural milieu of the American South during the Jim Crow era and the Civil War. The Coens used it as a depressing song of annihilation for the mass murdering racists, and it is now being used to signal what appears to be the first Benoit Blanc mystery to return to Benoit’s ancestral homeland, the American South. ( The fact that one of the film’s law enforcement figures is dressed like someone from an American sheriff’s office as opposed to an English village confirms this setting even further. )

Although all of this speculation is true, Johnson’s decision to use this song and Stanley’s Grammy-winning version of it in particular is likely to have been one. We are left to wonder how deeply Southern the roots of his third murder mystery will be given how unafraid Johnson is to use what appear to be cozy murder mysteries to probe deeper issues of social rot and inequality in the modern world through both Glass Onion and Knives Out.

Wake Up Dead Man airs on Netflix on December 12.

The first article on Den of Geek: Wake Up Dead Man Video Ties to Coen Brothers and Grim Southern History.

But what on earth is a zealous stress?

Imagine a person determined to do it all. She is homeschooling two wonderful children while simultaneously working remotely with her husband. She has a demanding customer weight at work—all of whom she loves. She wakes up early to get some movement in ( or frequently catch up on work ), prepares dinner while the kids are having breakfast, and works while positioning herself near the end of her “fourth grade” to watch as she balances clients, tasks, and budgets. Sound like a bit? Also with a supportive group both at home and at work, it is.

Sounds like this person needs self-care and has too much on her disk. But no, she doesn’t have occasion for that. She begins to feel as though she’s dropping balloons. No accomplishing much. There’s not enough of her to be here and that, she is trying to divide her head in two all the time, all day, every day. She begins to question herself. And as those thoughts creep in more and more, her domestic tale becomes more and more important.

She immediately KNOWS what she must do! She may DO MORE.

This is a difficult and dangerous period. Know the reasons. Because when she doesn’t end that new purpose, that storyline will get worse. She instantly starts failing. She isn’t doing much. SHE is not enough. She’ll discover more she may do because she might neglect, or perhaps her home. She doesn’t nap as much, proceed because much, all in the attempts to do more. caught in this pattern of attempting to prove herself to herself without ever succeeding. Not feeling “enough”.

But, yeah, that’s what zealous burnout looks like for me. It develops gradually over the course of several weeks and months rather than immediately as a big sign. My burning out process looks like speeding up, hardly a man losing focus. I move up and up and up, and therefore I simply quit.

I am the one who had

It’s interesting the things that shape us. Through the camera of my own childhood, I witnessed the battles, sacrifices, and concerns of someone who had to make it all work without having much. I was happy that my mom was so competent and my dad sympathetic, I never went without and also got an extra here or there.

Growing up, I didn’t feel shame when my mom gave me food postcards; in fact, I would have likely sparked debates about the subject, orally eviscerating anyone who dared to criticize the disabled person who was attempting to ensure all of our needs were met with so little. As a child, I watched the way the worry of not making those begins meet impacted people I love. As the non-disabled people in my home, I did take on many of the real things because I was” the one who was” make our lives a little easier. I soon realized that putting more of myself into it was linked to fears or doubt; I am the one who does. I learned first that when something frightens me, I may double down and work harder to make it better. I am capable of taking on the problem. When individuals have seen this in me as an adult, I’ve been told I seem courageous, but make no mistake, I’m not. If I seem courageous, it’s because this conduct was forged from other people’s worries.

And here I am, more than 30 years later, also feeling the urge to aimlessly force myself forward when faced with daunting tasks in front of me, assuming that I am the one who is and consequently does. I find myself driven to prove that I can make things happen if I work longer hours, take on more responsibility, and do more.

I don’t see people who struggle financially as failures because I have seen how strong that tide can be; it pulls you along the way. I truly get that I have been privileged to be able to avoid many of the challenges that were present in my youth. That said, I am still” the one who can” who feels she should, so if I were faced with not having enough to make ends meet for my own family, I would see myself as having failed. Despite my best efforts and education, the majority of this is due to chance. I will, however, allow myself the arrogance of saying I have been careful with my choices to have encouraged that luck. My sense of identity comes from the notion that I am” the one who can” and feel compelled to accomplish the most. I can choose to stop, and with some quite literal cold water splashed in my face, I’ve made the choice to before. But that choosing to stop is not my go-to, I move forward, driven by a fear that is so a part of me that I barely notice it’s there until I’m feeling utterly worn away.

Why all this history, then? You see, burnout is a fickle thing. Over the years, I’ve read and heard a lot about burnout. Burnout is real. Especially now, with COVID, many of us are balancing more than we ever have before—all at once! It’s challenging, and so many amazing professionals are affected by the avoidance, the shutting down, and the procrastination. There are important articles that relate to what I imagine must be the majority of people out there, but not me. That’s not how I look at burnout.

The dangerous invisibility of zealous burnout

A lot of work environments see the extra hours, extra effort, and overall focused commitment as an asset ( and sometimes that’s all it is ). They see a person attempting to overcome obstacles, not a person trapped in fear. Many well-meaning organizations have safeguards in place to protect their teams from burnout. However, in situations like this, those alarms don’t always ring, and some organization members are surprised and depressed when the inevitable stop happens. And sometimes maybe even betrayed.

Parents—more so mothers, statistically speaking—are praised as being so on top of it all when they can work, be involved in the after-school activities, practice self-care in the form of diet and exercise, and still meet friends for coffee or wine. Many of us watched endless streaming COVID episodes to see how challenging the female protagonist is, but she is strong, funny, and capable of doing it. It’s a “very special episode” when she breaks down, cries in the bathroom, woefully admits she needs help, and just stops for a bit. Truth be told, countless people are avoiding tears or doomscrolling to flee. We know that the media is a lie to amuse us, but often the perception that it’s what we should strive for has penetrated much of society.

Women and burnout

I adore men. And though I don’t love every man ( heads up, I don’t love every woman or nonbinary person either ), I think there is a beautiful spectrum of individuals who represent that particular binary gender.

Despite this, women are still more frequently at risk of burnout than their male counterparts, especially in these COVID stressed out times. Mothers in the workplace feel the pressure to do all the “mom” things while giving 110 %. Mothers not in the workplace feel they need to do more to” justify” their lack of traditional employment. Women who are not mothers frequently feel the need to work even more at home because of the pressure. It’s vicious and systemic and so a part of our culture that we’re often not even aware of the enormity of the pressures we put on ourselves and each other.

And there are costs that go beyond happiness. Harvard Health Publishing released a study a decade ago that “uncovered strong links between women’s job stress and cardiovascular disease”. The CDC noted,” Heart disease is the leading cause of death for women in the United States, killing 299, 578 women in 2017—or about 1 in every 5 female deaths”.

According to what I’ve read, this connection between work stress and health is more dangerous for women than it is for their non-female counterparts.

But what if your burnout isn’t like that either?

That might not be you either. After all, each of us is so different and how we respond to stressors is too. It’s part of what makes us human. Don’t put too much emphasis on how burnout looks; instead, learn to recognize it in yourself. Here are a few questions I sometimes ask friends if I am concerned about them.

Are you content? This simple question should be the first thing you ask yourself. Chances are, even if you’re burning out doing all the things you love, as you approach burnout you’ll just stop taking as much joy from it all.

Do you feel like you have the authority to decline? I have observed in myself and others that when someone is burning out, they no longer feel they can say no to things. Even those who don’t” speed up” feel pressured to say “yes” to avoid apprehension.

What are three things you’ve done for yourself? Another observance is that we all tend to stop doing things for ourselves. anything from avoiding conversations with friends to skipping showers and eating poorly. These can be red flags.

Are you using justifications? Many of us try to disregard feelings of burnout. Over and over I have heard,” It’s just crunch time”,” As soon as I do this one thing, it will all be better”, and” Well I should be able to handle this, so I’ll figure it out”. And it might actually be crunch time, a single objective, or a set of skills you need to master. That happens—life happens. Be open to yourself if this continues to happen. If you’ve worked more 50-hour weeks since January than not, maybe it’s not crunch time—maybe it’s a bad situation that you’re burning out from.

Do you have a plan to stop feeling this way? If something has an exit route with a pause button if it is truly temporary and you do need to simply push through, it does.
defined end.

Take the time to listen to your friend in the same way. Be honest, allow yourself to be uncomfortable, and break the thought cycles that prevent you from healing.

So now what?

What I just described has a different path to burnout, but it’s still burnout. There are well-established approaches to working through burnout:

• Get enough sleep.
• Eat healthy.
• Work out.
• Leave the house.
• Take a break.
• Practice self-care in general.

Those are hard for me because they feel like more tasks. If I’m in the burnout cycle, doing any of the above for me feels like a waste. Why would I take care of myself when I’m dropping all those other balls, according to the narrative? People need me, right?

Your inner voice might be pretty bad by now if you’re deeply in the cycle. If you need to, tell yourself you need to take care of the person your people depend on. If your roles are pushing you toward burnout, use them to help make healing easier by justifying the time spent working on you.

I have come up with a few suggestions for me to help me remember the airline attendant’s advice to put on your face first when I feel burned out.

Cook an elaborate meal for someone!

Okay, since I’m a “food-focused” person, cooking for someone always comes naturally to my mind. There are countless tales in my home of someone walking into the kitchen and turning right around and walking out when they noticed I was” chopping angrily”. But it’s more than that, and you should give it a try. Seriously. It’s the perfect go-to if you don’t feel worthy of taking time for yourself—do it for someone else. Because the majority of us work in a digital world, cooking can pique your interest and make you feel present in the moment in all your ways. It can break you out of your head and help you gain a better perspective. In my house, I’ve been known to pick a place on the map and cook food that comes from wherever that is ( thank you, Pinterest ). I enjoy making Indian food because the smells are warm, the bread needs just enough kneading to keep my hands engaged, and the process requires real attention for me because it’s not what I was raised making. And in the end, we all win!

Vent like a sniveling jerk.

Be careful with this one!

I have been making an effort to practice more gratitude over the past few years, and I recognize the true benefits of that. Having said that, sometimes you just need to let it all out, even the ugly ones. Hell, I’m a big fan of not sugarcoating our lives, and that sometimes means that to get past the big pile of poop, you’re gonna wanna complain about it a bit.

When that is required, approach a trusted friend and express your concerns verbally. You need to trust this friend not to judge, to see your pain, and, most importantly, to tell you to remove your cranium from your own rectal cavity. Seriously, it’s about getting a reality check here! One of the things that I admire most about my husband is how he can simplify things down to the simplest of terms, even though sometimes after the fact. ” We’re spending our lives together, of course you’re going to disappoint me from time to time, so get over it” has been his way of speaking his dedication, love, and acceptance of me—and I could not be more grateful. Of course, it also required that I take my head out of that rectal cavity. So, again, usually those moments are appreciated in hindsight.

Pick up a book!

There are many books out there that are more like you sharing their stories and how they’ve come to find greater balance than they are self-help. Maybe you’ll find something that speaks to you. Among the titles that have stood out to me are:

• Thrive by Arianna Huffington
• Tools of Titans by Tim Ferriss
• Girl, Stop apologizing, Rachel Hollis
• Dare to Lead by Brené Brown

Or, another method I enjoy using is to read or listen to a book that is NOTHING to do with my work-life balance. I’ve read the following books and found they helped balance me out because my mind was pondering their interesting topics instead of running in circles:

• The Drunken Botanist by Amy Stewart
• Darin Olien’s Superlife
• A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived by Adam Rutherford
• Toby Hemenway’s Gaia’s Garden is available.

If you’re not into reading, pick up a topic on YouTube or choose a podcast to subscribe to. I’ve watched countless permaculture and gardening topics in addition to how to raise chickens and ducks. For the record, I don’t currently have a particularly large food garden or raise any kind of livestock. I just find the topic interesting, and it has nothing to do with any aspect of my life that needs anything from me.

Give yourself a break.

You are never going to be perfect—hell, it would be boring if you were. It’s OK to be broken and flawed. Being tired, depressed, and worried is human nature. It’s OK to not do it all. You can’t be brave without being imperfect, which is terrifying.

This last one is the most important: allow yourself permission to NOT do it all. You never promised to be everything to everyone at all times. We have greater power than the repressed fears that motivate us.

This is hard. It’s challenging for me. It’s what’s driven me to write this—that it’s OK to stop. It’s OK that your unhealthy habit that might even benefit those around you needs to end. You can continue to succeed in life.

I recently read that we are all writing our eulogy in how we live. What will your professional accomplishments say, knowing that yours won’t be mentioned in that speech? What do you want it to say?

Look, I get that none of these ideas will “fix it”, and that’s not their purpose. Only how we react to the things around us is what we control. These suggestions are to help stop the spiral effect so that you are empowered to address the underlying issues and choose your response. Most of the time, I find these to be effective. Maybe they’ll work for you.

Does this sound familiar?

If this sounds familiar, you’re not just going to know about it. Don’t let your negative self-talk tell you that you “even burn out wrong”. It is not improper. Even if rooted in fear like my own drivers, I believe that this need to do more comes from a place of love, determination, motivation, and other wonderful attributes that make you the amazing person you are. We’re going to be OK, ya know. The lives that come before us might never have the same meaning as the one we’re striving for, which is acceptable because the only way to judge is in the mirror when we stop and look around.

Do you remember that Winnie the Pooh sketch that had Pooh eat so much at Rabbit’s house that his buttocks couldn’t fit through the door? Well, I already have a strong connection to Rabbit, so it was surprising when he unexpectedly declared that this was unacceptable. But do you recall what happened next? He put a shelf across poor Pooh’s ankles and decorations on his back, and made the best of the big butt in his kitchen.

We are resourceful and aware that we can push ourselves when we are needed, even when we are exhausted to the core or have a ton of clutter in our room. None of us has to be afraid, as we can manage any obstacle put in front of us. And maybe that means we will need to redefine success to make room for comfortable human space, but that doesn’t really sound that bad either.

So, wherever you are right now, please breathe. Do what you need to do to get out of your head. Give thanks and be considerate.

One of the most successful soft knowledge we have at our disposal is the ability to work together to improve our patterns while developing our own abilities and opinions, in whatever form it takes, and whatever it may be called.

Feedback is also one of the most underestimated equipment, and generally by assuming that we’re now great at it, we settle, forgetting that it’s a skill that can be trained, grown, and improved. Bad comments can lead to conflict in projects, lower confidence, and long-term, undermine trust and teamwork. Quality opinions can be a revolutionary force.

Practicing our knowledge is absolutely a good way to enhance, but the learning gets yet faster when it’s paired with a good base that programs and focuses the exercise. What are some fundamental components of providing effective opinions? And how can comments be adjusted for rural and distributed job settings?

On the web, we may find a long history of sequential comments: code was written and discussed on mailing lists since the beginning of open source. Currently, engineers engage on pull calls, developers post in their favourite design tools, project managers and sprint masters exchange ideas on tickets, and so on.

Design analysis is often the label used for a type of input that’s provided to make our job better, jointly. It generally shares many of the concepts with suggestions, but it also has some differences.

The information

The content of the feedback serves as the foundation for every effective criticism, so we need to start there. There are many versions that you can use to design your information. The one that I personally like best—because it’s obvious and actionable—is this one from Lara Hogan.

This formula is typically used to provide feedback to people, but it also fits really well in a design criticism because it finally addresses one of the main inquiries that we work on: What? Where? Why? How? Imagine that you’re giving some comments about some pattern function that spans several screens, like an onboard movement: there are some pages shown, a stream blueprint, and an outline of the decisions made. You notice a flaw in the situation. If you keep the three elements of the equation in mind, you’ll have a mental model that can help you be more precise and effective.

Here is a comment that could be included in some feedback, and it might appear reasonable at first glance because it appears to merely fit the equation. But does it?

Not sure about the buttons ‘ styles and hierarchy—it feels off. Can you alter them?

Observation for design feedback doesn’t just mean pointing out which part of the interface your feedback refers to, but it also refers to offering a perspective that’s as specific as possible. Do you offer the user’s viewpoint? Your expert perspective? A business perspective? From the perspective of the project manager? A first-time user’s perspective?

When I see these two buttons, I anticipate one to go forward and the other to go back.

Impact is about the why. Just pointing out a UI element might sometimes be enough if the issue may be obvious, but more often than not, you should add an explanation of what you’re pointing out.

When I see these two buttons, I anticipate one to go forward and the other to go back. But this is the only screen where this happens, as before we just used a single button and an “×” to close. This seems to be breaking the consistency in the flow.

The question approach is meant to provide open guidance by eliciting the critical thinking in the designer receiving the feedback. Notably, in Lara’s equation she provides a second approach: request, which instead provides guidance toward a specific solution. While that’s a viable option for general feedback, in my experience, going back to the question approach typically leads to the best solutions because designers are generally more at ease with having an open space to experiment with.

The difference between the two can be exemplified with, for the question approach:

When I see these two buttons, I anticipate one to go forward and the other to go back. But this is the only screen where this happens, as before we just used a single button and an “×” to close. This seems to be breaking the consistency in the flow. Would it make sense to unify them?

Or, for the request approach:

When I see these two buttons, I anticipate one to go forward and the other to go back. But this is the only screen where this happens, as before we just used a single button and an “×” to close. This seems to be breaking the consistency in the flow. Let’s make sure that all screens have the same pair of forward and back buttons.

At this point in some situations, it might be useful to integrate with an extra why: why you consider the given suggestion to be better.

When I see these two buttons, I anticipate one to go forward and the other to go back. But this is the only screen where this happens, as before we just used a single button and an “×” to close. This seems to be breaking the consistency in the flow. Let’s make sure that all screens have the same two forward and back buttons so that users don’t get confused.

Choosing the question approach or the request approach can also at times be a matter of personal preference. I spent a while working on improving my feedback, conducting anonymous feedback reviews and sharing feedback with others. After a few rounds of this work and a year later, I got a positive response: my feedback came across as effective and grounded. Until I changed teams. Surprise surprise, my next round of criticism from a specific person wasn’t very positive. The reason is that I had previously tried not to be prescriptive in my advice—because the people who I was previously working with preferred the open-ended question format over the request style of suggestions. However, there was one person in this other team who now preferred specific guidance. So I adapted my feedback for them to include requests.

One comment that I heard come up a few times is that this kind of feedback is quite long, and it doesn’t seem very efficient. Yes, but no. Let’s explore both sides.

No, this kind of feedback is effective because the length is a byproduct of clarity, and giving this kind of feedback can provide precisely enough information for a sound fix. Also if we zoom out, it can reduce future back-and-forth conversations and misunderstandings, improving the overall efficiency and effectiveness of collaboration beyond the single comment. Imagine that in the example above the feedback were instead just,” Let’s make sure that all screens have the same two forward and back buttons”. Since the designer receiving this feedback wouldn’t have much to go by, they might just make the change. In later iterations, the interface might change or they might introduce new features—and maybe that change might not make sense anymore. Without explaining the why, the designer might assume that the change is one of consistency, but what if it wasn’t? So there could now be an underlying concern that changing the buttons would be perceived as a regression.

Yes, this style of feedback is not always efficient because the points in some comments don’t always need to be exhaustive, sometimes because certain changes may be obvious (” The font used doesn’t follow our guidelines” ) and sometimes because the team may have a lot of internal knowledge such that some of the whys may be implied.

Therefore, the equation above is intended to serve as a mnemonic to reflect and enhance the practice rather than a strict template for feedback. Even after years of active work on my critiques, I still from time to time go back to this formula and reflect on whether what I just wrote is effective.

The atmosphere

Well-grounded content is the foundation of feedback, but that’s not really enough. The soft skills of the person who’s providing the critique can multiply the likelihood that the feedback will be well received and understood. It has been demonstrated that only positive feedback can lead to sustained change in people. It can be determined by tone alone whether content is rejected or welcomed.

Since our goal is to be understood and to have a positive working environment, tone is essential to work on. I’ve tried to summarize the necessary soft skills over the years using a formula that resembles that of the content receptivity equation.

Respectful feedback comes across as grounded, solid, and constructive. It’s the kind of feedback that, whether it’s positive or negative, is perceived as useful and fair.

The time when feedback occurs is known as timing. To-the-point feedback doesn’t have much hope of being well received if it’s given at the wrong time. If a new feature’s entire high-level information architecture is about to go live when it’s about to be released, it might still be relevant if that questioning raises a significant blocker that no one saw, but those concerns are much more likely to have to wait for a later revision. So in general, attune your feedback to the stage of the project. Early iteration? Iteration later? Polishing work in progress? Each of these has unique needs. The right timing will make it more likely that your feedback will be well received.

Attitude is the equivalent of intent, and in the context of person-to-person feedback, it can be referred to as radical candor. Before writing, it’s important to make sure the person we’re writing will actually benefit them and improve the overall project. This might be a hard reflection at times because maybe we don’t want to admit that we don’t really appreciate that person. Although it’s possible, and that’s okay, it’s hoped not to be the case. Acknowledging and owning that can help you make up for that: how would I write if I really cared about them? How can I avoid being passive aggressive? How can I encourage constructive behavior?

Form is relevant especially in a diverse and cross-cultural work environments because having great content, perfect timing, and the right attitude might not come across if the way that we write creates misunderstandings. There could be many reasons for this: some words might cause particular reactions, some non-native speakers might not understand all the nuances of some sentences, and other times our brains might be different and we might perceive the world differently. Neurodiversity must be taken into account. Whatever the reason, it’s important to review not just what we write but how.

A few years back, I was asking for some feedback on how I give feedback. I was given some sound advice, but I also got a surprise comment. They pointed out that when I wrote” Oh, ]… ]”, I made them feel stupid. That’s not what I meant to say! I felt really bad, and I just realized that I provided feedback to them for months, and every time I might have made them feel stupid. I was horrified … but also thankful. I quickly changed my spelling mistake by adding “oh” to my list of replaced words (your choice between aText, TextExpander, or others ) so that when I typed “oh,” it was immediately deleted.

Something to highlight because it’s quite frequent—especially in teams that have a strong group spirit—is that people tend to beat around the bush. A positive attitude doesn’t necessarily mean giving in to criticism; it just means that you give it in a respectful and constructive manner, whether it be in the form of criticism or criticism. The nicest thing that you can do for someone is to help them grow.

We have a great advantage in giving feedback in written form: it can be reviewed by another person who isn’t directly involved, which can help to reduce or remove any bias that might be there. When I shared a comment with someone I knew,” How does this sound,”” How can I do it better,” or even” How would you have written it,” I discovered that the two versions had different meanings.

The format

Asynchronous feedback also has a significant inherent benefit: we can devote more time to making sure that the suggestions ‘ clarity of communication and actionability fulfill two main objectives.

Let’s imagine that someone shared a design iteration for a project. You are reviewing it and leaving a comment. There are many ways to accomplish this, and context is of course important, but let’s try to think about some things that might be worthwhile to take into account.

In terms of clarity, start by grounding the critique that you’re about to give by providing context. This includes specifically describing where you’re coming from: do you have a thorough understanding of the project, or is this your first time seeing it? Are you coming from a high-level perspective, or are you figuring out the details? Are there regressions? Which user’s point of view are you addressing when offering your feedback? Is the design iteration at a point where it would be okay to ship this, or are there major things that need to be addressed first?

Even if you’re giving feedback to a team that already has some background information on the project, providing context is helpful. And context is absolutely essential when giving cross-team feedback. If I were to review a design that might be indirectly related to my work, and if I had no knowledge about how the project arrived at that point, I would say so, highlighting my take as external.

We frequently concentrate on the negatives and attempt to list all the things that could be improved. That’s of course important, but it’s just as important—if not more—to focus on the positives, especially if you saw progress from the previous iteration. Although this may seem superfluous, it’s important to remember that design has a number of possible solutions to each problem. So pointing out that the design solution that was chosen is good and explaining why it’s good has two major benefits: it confirms that the approach taken was solid, and it helps to ground your negative feedback. In the longer term, sharing positive feedback can help prevent regressions on things that are going well because those things will have been highlighted as important. Positive feedback can also help, as an added bonus, prevent impostor syndrome.

There’s one powerful approach that combines both context and a focus on the positives: frame how the design is better than the status quo ( compared to a previous iteration, competitors, or benchmarks ) and why, and then on that foundation, you can add what could be improved. There is a significant difference between a critique of a design that is already in good shape and one that isn’t quite there yet.

Another way that you can improve your feedback is to depersonalize the feedback: the comments should always be about the work, never about the person who made it. It’s” This button isn’t well aligned” versus” You haven’t aligned this button well”. Just before sending, review your writing to make changes to this.

In terms of actionability, one of the best approaches to help the designer who’s reading through your feedback is to split it into bullet points or paragraphs, which are easier to review and analyze one by one. You might want to break up the feedback into sections or even between several comments for longer pieces. Of course, adding screenshots or signifying markers of the specific part of the interface you’re referring to can also be especially useful.

One approach that I’ve personally used effectively in some contexts is to enhance the bullet points with four markers using emojis. A red square indicates that it is something I consider blocking, a yellow diamond indicates that it should be changed, and a green circle indicates that it is fully confirmed. I also use a blue spiral � � for either something that I’m not sure about, an exploration, an open alternative, or just a note. However, I’d only use this strategy on teams where I’ve already established a high level of trust because it might turn out to be quite demoralizing if I deliver a lot of red squares and change how I communicate that.

Let’s see how this would work by reusing the example that we used earlier as the first bullet point in this list:

• 🔶 Navigation—When I see these two buttons, I anticipate one to go forward and the other to go back. But this is the only screen where this happens, as before we just used a single button and an “×” to close. This seems to be breaking the consistency in the flow. Let’s make sure that all screens have the same two forward and back buttons so that users don’t get confused.
• � � Overall— I think the page is solid, and this is good enough to be our release candidate for a version 1.0.
• � � Metrics—Good improvement in the buttons on the metrics area, the improved contrast and new focus style make them more accessible.
• Button Style: Using the green accent in this context, which conveys that it is a positive action because green is typically seen as a confirmation color. Do we need to explore a different color?
• Tiles—It seems to me that the tiles should use the Subtitle 2 style rather than the Subtitle 1 style given the number of items on the page and the overall page hierarchy. This will keep the visual hierarchy more consistent.
• � � Background—Using a light texture works well, but I wonder whether it adds too much noise in this kind of page. What is the purpose behind using that?

What about giving feedback directly in Figma or another design tool that allows in-place feedback? These are generally difficult to use because they conceal discussions and are harder to follow, but in the right setting, they can be very effective. Just make sure that each of the comments is separate so that it’s easier to match each discussion to a single task, similar to the idea of splitting mentioned above.

One final note: say the obvious. We don’t say something because we sometimes think it’s obvious that something is either good or wrong. Or sometimes we might have a doubt that we don’t express because the question might sound stupid. Say it, that’s fine. You might have to reword it a little bit to make the reader feel more comfortable, but don’t hold it back. Good feedback is transparent, even when it may be obvious.

Another benefit of asynchronous feedback is that written feedback automatically monitors decisions. Especially in large projects,” Why did we do this”? There’s nothing better than open, transparent discussions that can be reviewed at any time, and this could be a question that arises from time to time. For this reason, I recommend using software that saves these discussions, without hiding them once they are resolved.

Content, tone, and format. Although each of these subjects offers a useful model, focusing on improving eight of the subjects ‘ focus points, including observation, impact, question, timing, attitude, form, clarity, and actionability, is a lot of work to complete at once. One effective approach is to take them one by one: first identify the area that you lack the most (either from your perspective or from feedback from others ) and start there. Then the second, followed by the third, and so on. At first you’ll have to put in extra time for every piece of feedback that you give, but after a while, it’ll become second nature, and your impact on the work will multiply.

Thanks to Brie Anne Demkiw and Mike Shelton for reviewing the first draft of this article.

” Any post” you might have? is perhaps one of the worst ways to ask for opinions. It’s obscure and unreliable, and it doesn’t give a clear picture of what we’re looking for. Getting good opinions starts sooner than we might hope: it starts with the demand.

Starting the process of receiving feedback with a question may seem counterintuitive, but it makes sense if we consider that receiving feedback can be seen as a form of pattern research. In the same way that we wouldn’t perform any studies without the correct questions to get the insight that we need, the best way to ask for feedback is also to build strong issues.

Design analysis is not a one-time procedure. Sure, any great comments process continues until the project is finished, but this is especially true for layout because architecture work continues iteration after iteration, from a high level to the finest details. Each stage requires its unique set of questions.

And suddenly, as with any great research, we need to review what we got up, get to the base of its perspectives, and take activity. Topic, generation, and analysis. This look at each of those.

The query

Being available to input is important, but we need to be specific about what we’re looking for. Any comments,” What do you think,” or” I’d love to hear your mind” at the conclusion of a presentation are likely to garner a lot of different ideas, or worse, to make everyone follow the lead of the first speaker. And next… we get frustrated because vague issues like those you turn a high-level moves review into folks rather commenting on the borders of buttons. Which issue may be important, so it might be difficult to get the team to pay attention to it.

But how do we get into this scenario? A number of elements are involved. One is that we don’t often consider asking as a part of the input method. Another is how healthy it is to keep the question open and assume that everyone else will agree. Another is that in nonprofessional debate, there’s usually no need to be that exact. In summary, we tend to undervalue the value of the issues, and we don’t work to improve them.

The work of asking good questions guidelines and focuses the criticism. It also serves as a form of acceptance, outlining your willingness to make comments and the types of responses you want to receive. It puts people in the right emotional position, especially in situations when they weren’t expecting to give opinions.

There isn’t a second best way to ask for opinions. It simply needs to be certain, and precision may take several shapes. The one of level than depth is a design for design criticism that I’ve found to be particularly helpful in my coaching.

” Stage” refers to each of the actions of the process—in our event, the design process. The kind of feedback changes as the consumer research moves forward to the final design. But within a single stage, one might also examine whether some assumptions are correct and whether there’s been a suitable language of the amassed input into updated designs as the task has evolved. The layers of user experience could serve as a starting point for potential questions. What do you want to know: Project objectives? User requirements? Functionality? Content? Interaction design? a system of information architecture UI design? navigation planning Visual design? Branding?

Here’re a few example questions that are precise and to the point that refer to different layers:

• Functionality: Is it desirable to automate account creation?
• Interaction design: Take a look through the updated flow and let me know whether you see any steps or error states that I might’ve missed.
• Information architecture: This page contains two competing pieces of information. Is the structure effective in communicating them both?
• User interface design: What do you think about the top-most error counter, which ensures that you can see the next error even when the error is outside the viewport?
• Navigation design: From research, we identified these second-level navigation items, but once you’re on the page, the list feels too long and hard to navigate. Do you have any suggestions for how to handle this?
• Visual design: Are the sticky notifications in the bottom-right corner visible enough?

How much of a presentation’s depth would be on the other axis of specificity. For example, we might have introduced a new end-to-end flow, but there was a specific view that you found particularly challenging and you’d like a detailed review of that. This can be especially helpful from one iteration to the next when it’s crucial to highlight the areas that have changed.

There are other things that we can consider when we want to achieve more specific—and more effective—questions.

A quick fix is to get rid of the generic qualifiers from questions like “good”, “well,” “nice,” “bad,” “okay,” and” cool.” For example, asking,” When the block opens and the buttons appear, is this interaction good”? is it possible to look specific, but you can identify the “good” qualifier and make the question” When the block opens and the buttons appear, is it clear what the next action is” look like?

Sometimes we actually do want broad feedback. That’s uncommon, but it can occur. In that sense, you might still make it explicit that you’re looking for a wide range of opinions, whether at a high level or with details. Or perhaps you should just say,” At first glance, what do you think”? so that it’s clear that what you’re asking is open ended but focused on someone’s impression after their first five seconds of looking at it.

Sometimes the project is particularly broad, and some areas may have already been thoroughly explored. In these situations, it might be useful to explicitly say that some parts are already locked in and aren’t open to feedback. Although it’s not something I’d recommend in general, I’ve found it helpful in avoiding getting back into rabbit holes like those that could lead to even more refinement if what’s important right now isn’t.

Asking specific questions can completely change the quality of the feedback that you receive. Even experienced designers will appreciate the clarity and efficiency gained from concentrating solely on what is required, and those with less refined critique skills will now be able to offer more actionable feedback. It can save a lot of time and frustration.

The iteration

Design iterations are probably the most visible part of the design work, and they provide a natural checkpoint for feedback. Many design tools have inline commenting, but many of them only display changes as a single fluid stream in the same file. In addition, these kinds of design tools automatically update shared UI components, make conversations disappear and require designs to always display the most recent version, unless these would-be useful features were manually disabled. The implied goal that these design tools seem to have is to arrive at just one final copy with all discussions closed, probably because they inherited patterns from how written documents are collaboratively edited. That approach to design critiques is probably not the best approach, but some teams might benefit from it even if I don’t want to be too prescriptive.

The asynchronous design-critique approach that I find most effective is to create explicit checkpoints for discussion. I’m going to use the term iteration post for this. It refers to a write-up or presentation of the design iteration followed by a discussion thread of some kind. Any platform that can accommodate this type of structure can use this. By the way, when I refer to a “write-up or presentation“, I’m including video recordings or other media too: as long as it’s asynchronous, it works.

There are many benefits to using iteration posts:

• It creates a rhythm in the design work so that the designer can review feedback from each iteration and prepare for the next.
• Decisions are always available, and conversations are also made accessible for future review.
• It creates a record of how the design changed over time.
• It might also make it simpler to collect and act on feedback depending on the tool.

These posts of course don’t mean that no other feedback approach should be used, just that iteration posts could be the primary rhythm for a remote design team to use. From there, there can be additional feedback techniques ( such as live critique, pair designing, or inline comments ).

I don’t think there’s a standard format for iteration posts. However, there are a few high-level components that make sense to include as a baseline:

1. The goal
2. The layout
3. The list of changes
4. The querys

Each project is likely to have a goal, and hopefully it’s something that’s already been summarized in a single sentence somewhere else, such as the client brief, the product manager’s outline, or the project owner’s request. Therefore, I would repeat this in every iteration post, literally copy and pasting it. The idea is to provide context and to repeat what’s essential to make each iteration post complete so that there’s no need to find information spread across multiple posts. The most recent iteration post will have everything I need if I want to know about the most recent design.

This copy-and-paste part introduces another relevant concept: alignment comes from repetition. Therefore, repeating information in posts helps to ensure that everyone is on the same page.

The design is then the actual series of information-architecture outlines, diagrams, flows, maps, wireframes, screens, visuals, and any other kind of design work that’s been done. It’s any design object, to put it briefly. For the final stages of work, I prefer the term blueprint to emphasize that I’ll be showing full flows instead of individual screens to make it easier to understand the bigger picture.

Because it makes it easier to refer to the objects, it might also be helpful to have clear names on them. Write the post in a way that helps people understand the work. It’s not much different from creating a strong live presentation.

For an efficient discussion, you should also include a bullet list of the changes from the previous iteration to let people focus on what’s new, which can be especially useful for larger pieces of work where keeping track, iteration after iteration, could become a challenge.

Finally, as mentioned earlier, it’s crucial that you include a list of the questions to help you guide the design critique in the desired direction. Doing this as a numbered list can also help make it easier to refer to each question by its number.

Not every iteration is the same. Earlier iterations don’t need to be as tightly focused—they can be more exploratory and experimental, maybe even breaking some of the design-language guidelines to see what’s possible. Then, later, the iterations begin coming to a decision and improving it until the design process is complete and the feature is ready.

I want to highlight that even if these iteration posts are written and conceived as checkpoints, by no means do they need to be exhaustive. A post might be a draft, just a concept to start a discussion, or it might be a cumulative list of all the features that have been added over the course of each iteration until the full picture is achieved.

Over time, I also started using specific labels for incremental iterations: i1, i2, i3, and so on. Although this may seem like a minor labeling tip, it can be useful in many ways:

• Unique—It’s a clear unique marker. One can quickly say,” This was discussed in i4″ with each project, and everyone knows where to go to review things.
• Unassuming—It works like versions ( such as v1, v2, and v3 ) but in contrast, versions create the impression of something that’s big, exhaustive, and complete. Attempts must be exploratory, incomplete, or partial.
• Future proof—It resolves the “final” naming problem that you can run into with versions. No more files with the title “final final complete no-really-its-done” Within each project, the largest number always represents the latest iteration.

The wording release candidate (RC ) could be used to describe a design as complete enough to be worked on, even if there might be some bits that still need more attention and in turn, more iterations would be required, such as” with i8 we reached RC” or “i12 is an RC” to indicate when it is finished.

The review

What typically occurs during a design critique is an open discussion, with a back and forth between parties that can be very productive. This approach is particularly effective during live, synchronous feedback. However, when we work asynchronously, using a different approach is more effective: we can adopt a user-research mindset. Written feedback from teammates, stakeholders, or others can be treated as if it were the result of user interviews and surveys, and we can analyze it accordingly.

Asynchronous feedback is particularly effective because of this shift, especially around these friction points:

1. It removes the pressure to reply to everyone.
2. It lessens the annoyance of snoop-by comments.
3. It lessens our personal stake.

The first friction is being forced to respond to every comment. Sometimes we write the iteration post, and we get replies from our team. It’s just a few of them, it’s simple, and there isn’t much of a problem with it. But other times, some solutions might require more in-depth discussions, and the amount of replies can quickly increase, which can create a tension between trying to be a good team player by replying to everyone and doing the next design iteration. This might be especially true if the respondent is a stakeholder or someone directly involved in the project who we feel we need to speak with. We need to accept that this pressure is absolutely normal, and it’s human nature to try to accommodate people who we care about. When responding to all comments, it can be effective, but when we consider a design critique more like user research, we realize that we don’t need to respond to every comment, and there are alternatives in asynchronous spaces:

One is to let the next iteration speak for itself. That is the response when the design changes and we publish a follow-up iteration. You might tag all the people who were involved in the previous discussion, but even that’s a choice, not a requirement.
• Another option is to respond politely to acknowledge each comment, such as” Understood. Thank you”,” Good points— I’ll review”, or” Thanks. These will be included in the upcoming iteration. In some cases, this could also be just a single top-level comment along the lines of” Thanks for all the feedback everyone—the next iteration is coming soon”!
• Another option is to provide a quick summary of the comments before moving on. Depending on your workflow, this can be particularly useful as it can provide a simplified checklist that you can then use for the next iteration.

The swoop-by comment, which is the kind of feedback that comes from a member of a team or non-project who might not be aware of the context, restrictions, decisions, or requirements, or of the discussions from earlier iterations, is the second friction point. On their side, there’s something that one can hope that they might learn: they could start to acknowledge that they’re doing this and they could be more conscious in outlining where they’re coming from. Swoop-by comments frequently prompt the simple thought,” We’ve already discussed this,” and it can be frustrating to have to keep coming back and forth.

Let’s begin by acknowledging again that there’s no need to reply to every comment. However, a brief response with a link to the previous discussion for additional information is typically sufficient if responding to a previously litigated point might be helpful. Remember, alignment comes from repetition, so it’s okay to repeat things sometimes!

Swoop-by commenting can still be useful for two reasons: first, they might point out something that isn’t clear, and second, they might have the power to fit in with a user’s perspective when they are seeing the design for the first time. Sure, you’ll still be frustrated, but that might at least help in dealing with it.

The personal stake we might have in relation to the design could be the third friction point, which might cause us to feel defensive if the review turned out to be more of a discussion. Treating feedback as user research helps us create a healthy distance between the people giving us feedback and our ego ( because yes, even if we don’t want to admit it, it’s there ). In the end, presenting everything in aggregated form helps us to prioritize our work more.

Always remember that while you need to listen to stakeholders, project owners, and specific advice, you don’t have to accept every piece of feedback. You must examine it and come up with a rationale for your choice, but sometimes “no” is the best choice.

As the designer leading the project, you’re in charge of that decision. In the end, everyone has their area of specialization, and the designer is the one with the most background and knowledge to make the right choice. And by listening to the feedback that you’ve received, you’re making sure that it’s also the best and most balanced decision.

Thanks to Mike Shelton and Brie Anne Demkiw for their initial review of this article.